Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Reduce search-index.js size - #56869
Conversation
QuietMisdreavus
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
At some point we should probably get more eyes and hands on the minifier crate. I just read over the changes and it looks clever. Doesn't seem to introduce any errors either, at least based on personally generating the std docs and looking in the console. And it gives some impressive results! Great work!
QuietMisdreavus
commented
Dec 19, 2018
@bors r+ (i'd mark it rollup but lockfile changes are kinda problematic to roll up...) |
bors
commented
Dec 19, 2018
📌 Commit bf4a984 has been approved by |
…, r=QuietMisdreavus Reduce search-index.js size Coming from: ``` 1735683 Dec 16 01:35 build/x86_64-apple-darwin/doc/search-index.js ``` to: ``` 727755 Dec 16 01:51 build/x86_64-apple-darwin/doc/search-index.js ``` r? @QuietMisdreavus
…, r=QuietMisdreavus Reduce search-index.js size Coming from: ``` 1735683 Dec 16 01:35 build/x86_64-apple-darwin/doc/search-index.js ``` to: ``` 727755 Dec 16 01:51 build/x86_64-apple-darwin/doc/search-index.js ``` r? @QuietMisdreavus
Rollup of 20 pull requests Successful merges: - #56802 (Add DoubleEndedIterator::nth_back) - #56842 (Add unstable VecDeque::rotate_{left|right}) - #56869 (Reduce search-index.js size) - #56887 (Disable field reordering for repr(int).) - #56892 (rustc: Update Clang used to build LLVM on Linux) - #56909 (static eval: Do not ICE on layout size overflow) - #56914 (Ignore ui/target-feature-gate on sparc, sparc64, powerpc, powerpc64 and powerpc64le) - #56917 (Simplify MIR generation for logical operations) - #56919 (Remove a wrong multiplier on relocation offset computation) - #56933 (Add --progress to git submodule commands in x.py) - #56941 (deny intra-doc link resolution failures in libstd) - #56964 (Remove `TokenStream::JointTree`.) - #56970 (Mem uninit doc ptr drop) - #56973 (make basic CTFE tracing available on release builds) - #56979 (Adding unwinding support for x86_64_fortanix_unknown_sgx target.) - #56981 (miri: allocation is infallible) - #56984 (A few tweaks to dropck_outlives) - #56989 (Fix compiletest `trim` deprecation warnings) - #56992 (suggest similar lint names for unknown lints) - #57002 (Stabilize Vec(Deque)::resize_with) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Rollup of 20 pull requests Successful merges: - #56802 (Add DoubleEndedIterator::nth_back) - #56842 (Add unstable VecDeque::rotate_{left|right}) - #56869 (Reduce search-index.js size) - #56887 (Disable field reordering for repr(int).) - #56892 (rustc: Update Clang used to build LLVM on Linux) - #56909 (static eval: Do not ICE on layout size overflow) - #56914 (Ignore ui/target-feature-gate on sparc, sparc64, powerpc, powerpc64 and powerpc64le) - #56917 (Simplify MIR generation for logical operations) - #56919 (Remove a wrong multiplier on relocation offset computation) - #56933 (Add --progress to git submodule commands in x.py) - #56941 (deny intra-doc link resolution failures in libstd) - #56964 (Remove `TokenStream::JointTree`.) - #56970 (Mem uninit doc ptr drop) - #56973 (make basic CTFE tracing available on release builds) - #56979 (Adding unwinding support for x86_64_fortanix_unknown_sgx target.) - #56981 (miri: allocation is infallible) - #56984 (A few tweaks to dropck_outlives) - #56989 (Fix compiletest `trim` deprecation warnings) - #56992 (suggest similar lint names for unknown lints) - #57002 (Stabilize Vec(Deque)::resize_with) Failed merges: r? @ghost
…, r=QuietMisdreavus Reduce search-index.js size Coming from: ``` 1735683 Dec 16 01:35 build/x86_64-apple-darwin/doc/search-index.js ``` to: ``` 727755 Dec 16 01:51 build/x86_64-apple-darwin/doc/search-index.js ``` r? @QuietMisdreavus
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
bf4a984 to
a4e6248CompareGuillaumeGomez
commented
Dec 24, 2018
@bors: r=QuietMisdreavus p=1 |
bors
commented
Dec 24, 2018
📌 Commit a4e62487cd44cca9f78a1c32a3d2366b12ed2c8f has been approved by |
bors
commented
Dec 24, 2018
⌛ Testing commit a4e62487cd44cca9f78a1c32a3d2366b12ed2c8f with merge b5809731f172ac2a0ba12bec0d1fa557c9224342... |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Jan 15, 2019
Nooooooo... |
8d070ba to
7105a16CompareQuietMisdreavus
commented
Jan 15, 2019
lockfiles... r=me when travis is green. Should we bump priority to try to beat any other PRs that touch the lockfile, or hope that the age of this one will let it jump the queue naturally? |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Jan 15, 2019
it's alphabetically sorted iirc so I'll just put a high priority (like 10). |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Jan 15, 2019
@bors: r=QuietMisdreavus p=10 |
bors
commented
Jan 15, 2019
📌 Commit 7105a16f87885831c3b885d420114f48c54a7903 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Jan 15, 2019
⌛ Testing commit 7105a16f87885831c3b885d420114f48c54a7903 with merge 01646444c20351d4d80b4d5ad15bee2f7e59622a... |
bors
commented
Jan 15, 2019
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
QuietMisdreavus
commented
Jan 15, 2019
|
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Jan 15, 2019
Ah, exact check might be a problem here. |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Jan 16, 2019
Remove the changes in the test (so we're back to the original one). Let's hope we won't have issues with the lock file either! @bors: r=QuietMisdreavus p=10 |
bors
commented
Jan 16, 2019
📌 Commit 3a311858f7e6d87111eccaadaedcfd7248ac2089 has been approved by |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Jan 16, 2019
Weird, the PR isn't in the build queue anymore... Let's try again? @bors: r=QuietMisdreavus p=10 |
bors
commented
Jan 16, 2019
📌 Commit 3a311858f7e6d87111eccaadaedcfd7248ac2089 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Jan 16, 2019
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Jan 17, 2019
And after a rebase, let's go again... @bors: r=QuietMisdreavus p=10 |
bors
commented
Jan 17, 2019
📌 Commit d405606 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Jan 17, 2019
bors
commented
Jan 17, 2019
☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor |
Coming from:
to:
r? @QuietMisdreavus