Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
forbid manually impl'ing one of an object type's marker traits - #57352
Merged
Conversation
nikomatsakis
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2019
nikomatsakis
commented
Jan 8, 2019
Contributor
@bors r+ |
bors
commented
Jan 8, 2019
Collaborator
📌 Commit d78ced24c31946782efaadbf31c735eb3390c652 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Jan 10, 2019
Collaborator
⌛ Testing commit d78ced24c31946782efaadbf31c735eb3390c652 with merge 04934f8c9b17eb17f295e06f10f1ed4098776bab... |
bors
commented
Jan 10, 2019
Collaborator
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
emilyalbini
commented
Jan 10, 2019
Member
@bors retry |
Centril
commented
Jan 13, 2019
Contributor
@bors r- Failed in rollup, #57576 (comment). (Try |
arielb1
commented
Jan 13, 2019
ContributorAuthor
At least this isn't a order randomization problem :-). |
This shouldn't break compatibility for crates that do not use `feature(optin_builtin_traits)`, because as the test shows, it is only possible to impl a marker trait for a trait object in the crate the marker trait is defined in, which must define `feature(optin_builtin_traits)`. Fixesrust-lang#56934
arielb1force-pushed
the
no-manual-markers
branch
from
January 14, 2019 22:27
d78ced2 to
d38a59fComparearielb1
commented
Jan 14, 2019
ContributorAuthor
@bors r=nikomatsakis |
bors
commented
Jan 14, 2019
Collaborator
📌 Commit d38a59f has been approved by |
Centril added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2019
…tsakis forbid manually impl'ing one of an object type's marker traits This shouldn't break compatibility for crates that do not use `feature(optin_builtin_traits)`, because as the test shows, it is only possible to impl a marker trait for a trait object in the crate the marker trait is defined in, which must define `feature(optin_builtin_traits)`. Fixesrust-lang#56934. r? @nikomatsakis
Centril added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2019
…tsakis forbid manually impl'ing one of an object type's marker traits This shouldn't break compatibility for crates that do not use `feature(optin_builtin_traits)`, because as the test shows, it is only possible to impl a marker trait for a trait object in the crate the marker trait is defined in, which must define `feature(optin_builtin_traits)`. Fixesrust-lang#56934. r? @nikomatsakis
bors added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2019
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #57253 (Make privacy checking, intrinsic checking and liveness checking incremental) - #57352 (forbid manually impl'ing one of an object type's marker traits) - #57537 (Small perf improvement for fmt) - #57579 (Add core::iter::once_with()) - #57587 (Add 'rustc-env:RUST_BACKTRACE=0' to const-pat-ice test) - #57608 (Simplify 'product' factorial example) - #57614 ([rustdoc] Fix crates filtering box not being filled) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Centril added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2019
…tsakis forbid manually impl'ing one of an object type's marker traits This shouldn't break compatibility for crates that do not use `feature(optin_builtin_traits)`, because as the test shows, it is only possible to impl a marker trait for a trait object in the crate the marker trait is defined in, which must define `feature(optin_builtin_traits)`. Fixesrust-lang#56934. r? @nikomatsakis
bors added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2019
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #56044 (Drop partially bound function parameters in the expected order) - #57352 (forbid manually impl'ing one of an object type's marker traits) - #57456 (RawVec doesn't always abort on allocation errors) - #57467 (Implement `check_attribute` to forbid `#[allow_internal_unsafe]`) - #57579 (Add core::iter::once_with()) - #57587 (Add 'rustc-env:RUST_BACKTRACE=0' to const-pat-ice test) - #57608 (Simplify 'product' factorial example) - #57614 ([rustdoc] Fix crates filtering box not being filled) Failed merges: r? @ghost
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This shouldn't break compatibility for crates that do not use
feature(optin_builtin_traits), because as the test shows, it isonly possible to impl a marker trait for a trait object in the crate the
marker trait is defined in, which must define
feature(optin_builtin_traits).Fixes#56934.
r? @nikomatsakis