Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Implement DoubleEndedIterator for CaseMappingIter - #60112
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Apr 19, 2019
r? @cramertj (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
56e48ca to
75bd00fCompareCentril
commented
Apr 19, 2019
r? @Amanieu |
rust-highfive
commented
Apr 19, 2019
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
75bd00f to
8bc563dCompare8bc563d to
89d2e51CompareAmanieu
commented
Apr 20, 2019
@rfcbot fcp merge |
Team member @Amanieu has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members: No concerns currently listed. Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me. |
sfackler
commented
Apr 20, 2019
Could you give an example of when you'd want to use this? |
clarfonthey
commented
Apr 20, 2019
This was denied before in #38968. |
There is no real point, it's mostly for consistency, I cannot see the CaseMappingIter ever changing in a way which would cause issues with having a DoubleEndedIterator implementation. About ExactSizeIterator, it was implemented in #58778 (although ExactSizeIterator is somewhat more useful), which I did implement while considering a potential Clippy lint requiring |
sfackler
commented
Apr 21, 2019
Our policy is generally to not take code that no one wants to use. Every new API imposes some cost, and we should at least be getting some value out of it. |
rfcbot
commented
May 1, 2019
🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔 |
rfcbot
commented
May 11, 2019
The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete. As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed. The RFC will be merged soon. |
Centril
commented
May 18, 2019
r? @sfackler |
Centril
commented
May 27, 2019
cc @rust-lang/libs Can someone please review this? :) |
alexcrichton
commented
May 28, 2019
Looks like a review was provided but since there aren't compelling use cases for it and it's otherwise seen as perhaps a bit too much code for libstd for now, I'm going to close this. |
For future reference (in case somebody found this pull request), this was implemented in #88858. |
No description provided.