Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Optimize HIR map - #60246
Conversation
Zoxc
commented
Apr 24, 2019
@bors try |
bors
commented
Apr 24, 2019
⌛ Trying commit d3bd03ce1d50238d54a70a96b22731cd76cc5e20 with merge 890cc87d1001f65c608c711d7a4d0d48129a43c1... |
rust-highfive
commented
Apr 24, 2019
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
bors
commented
Apr 24, 2019
☀️ Try build successful - checks-travis |
Xanewok
commented
Apr 24, 2019
@rust-timer build 890cc87d1001f65c608c711d7a4d0d48129a43c1 |
rust-timer
commented
Apr 24, 2019
Success: Queued 890cc87d1001f65c608c711d7a4d0d48129a43c1 with parent e305df1, comparison URL. |
rust-timer
commented
Apr 25, 2019
Finished benchmarking try commit 890cc87d1001f65c608c711d7a4d0d48129a43c1 |
Zoxc
commented
Apr 25, 2019
Seems like this approach works well. There's still some slight memory regressions though. |
rust-highfive
commented
Apr 25, 2019
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It takes a while to decipher what the structure looks like and why it looks this way - it'd be great if we could add a doc-comment here with an explanation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It'd be great to also add a comment here and/or rustfmt the function body
bors
commented
May 6, 2019
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #60337) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hir::map::Mapis the HIR map. Can you rename this type alias to HirEntryMap or something?
eddyb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks great, r=me modulo nits!
Zoxc
commented
May 8, 2019
@bors r=eddyb |
bors
commented
May 8, 2019
📌 Commit d33db6e has been approved by |
bors
commented
May 8, 2019
bors
commented
May 8, 2019
☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor |
| return Some(idx) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| fn matces_suffix(&self, hir: HirId) -> bool { |
| } | ||
| }; | ||
| self.all_ids().filter(move |hir| nodes.matces_suffix(*hir)).map(move |hir| { |
bjorn3
commented
May 8, 2019
I am a little confused about the order of comments on this PR: bors merges (1h ago) -> me reviewing it (few min ago) -> Zoxc gives r+ (3h ago). |
Zoxc
commented
May 8, 2019
@bjorn3 It's github new feature, time-travelling comments. |
bjorn3
commented
May 8, 2019
When looking at my notifications list, it said bors was the last commenter :) |
Zoxc
commented
May 8, 2019
You can see that I will post my comment in 3 hours. Github simply sorts comments by time! |
bjorn3
commented
May 8, 2019
On mobile it says 2 hours ago though. |
Builds on #59042
cc @ljedrz
r? @eddyb