Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
librustc: Fix drop finalizer not running for newtype structs. - #6125
Closed
luqmana wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
librustc: Fix drop finalizer not running for newtype structs.#6125luqmana wants to merge 1 commit into
luqmana wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
brson
commented
Apr 30, 2013
Contributor
Thanks! Can you please add a test case for this? |
bors added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2013
This was referenced May 2, 2013
bors added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2013
Follow up with test case for #6125.
U007D pushed a commit
to U007D/rust-mos
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2026
6125: Simplify ast_transform r=matklad a=matklad bors r+ 🤖 Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#6090
r? @brson