Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
replace serialize with serde in rustdoc - #62359
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That makes it so much simpler to understand! \o/
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Jul 4, 2019
If the generated index is the same as before, then it's all good for me. I'd just prefer if @QuietMisdreavus took a look to confirm and then here we go. Thanks a lot! |
edmilsonefs
commented
Jul 22, 2019
Hey! This is a ping from triage, we would like to know if you @QuietMisdreavus could give us a few minutes to share your thoughts on it. Thanks. |
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Jul 22, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is a tuple the right construct for this? Do serialize_tuple and serialize_seq come out the same when run through serde_json?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
They will be serialized the same way. This way, it saves the intermediate step of serializing everything to Value to make a Vec<Value>.
bors
commented
Aug 2, 2019
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #63207) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
totsteps
commented
Aug 6, 2019
Ping from triage, @euclio please resolve the merge conflicts. Thanks |
euclio
commented
Aug 10, 2019
Rebased. |
JohnCSimon
commented
Aug 17, 2019
Ping from triage Thank you! |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Aug 19, 2019
Looks good to me. Just one question: is there any difference in term of performance? |
bors
commented
Aug 19, 2019
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #63579) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Aug 25, 2019
I'm going to approve this per #62359 (comment) (and I've done my own review-ish, without trying to get into details of one to one compat). @bors r+ We're still fairly early in the release cycle as well so if something comes up we can revert, and since I'll be touching some of this code in some of my PRs I'd like to avoid conflicts. |
bors
commented
Aug 25, 2019
📌 Commit 972f0e07334917ea4690185a07b50c7ed557c5ea has been approved by |
bors
commented
Aug 25, 2019
⌛ Testing commit 972f0e07334917ea4690185a07b50c7ed557c5ea with merge 1675253b27b29808f17637a617b0edfe3e5374d5... |
bors
commented
Aug 26, 2019
💔 Test failed - checks-azure |
rust-highfive
commented
Aug 26, 2019
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Aug 26, 2019
@euclio you need to address the failing tests |
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Nov 30, 2019
retrying it |
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Dec 5, 2019
@euclio any updates on this? |
euclio
commented
Dec 5, 2019
@Dylan-DPC Needs a retry, looks like the last one didn't happen. |
bors
commented
Dec 5, 2019
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #66828) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Dec 6, 2019
@bors retry |
b87dd82 to
d2fe425Comparebors
commented
Dec 11, 2019
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #67198) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
d2fe425 to
94630d4Compareeuclio
commented
Dec 13, 2019
Rebased. |
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Dec 13, 2019
@bors r+ rollup=never |
bors
commented
Dec 13, 2019
📌 Commit 94630d4 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Dec 13, 2019
replace serialize with serde in rustdoc This is a slightly less aggressive version of #61028. r? @GuillaumeGomez
bors
commented
Dec 13, 2019
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
This is a slightly less aggressive version of #61028.
r? @GuillaumeGomez