Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
rustdoc: general cleanups - #62955
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Jul 24, 2019
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
ef4c04e to
dca3e43Compare@QuietMisdreavus Howdy from triage! This PR has sat waiting for review for a week. Can you please have a look? |
bors
commented
Aug 3, 2019
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #63180) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement this on &'tcx hir::Crate instead and have it create RustdocVisitor here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ideally, this entire module would use DefId, but this is an improvement.
eddyb
commented
Aug 10, 2019
r? @eddyb r=me after rebase and maybe @petrochenkov can take a look at the resolver changes |
dca3e43 to
f0c3563CompareMark-Simulacrum
commented
Aug 10, 2019
Rebased and fixed the review comments. I can try and replace everything with |
Previously visit could be called multiple times, but this is inaccurate, as it deconstructs Visitor state.
Also privatizes needlessly public methods to enforce which methods callers are intended to call, i.e., only `new` and `visit`.
f0c3563 to
32f144aCompareMark-Simulacrum
commented
Aug 10, 2019
@bors r=eddyb |
bors
commented
Aug 10, 2019
📌 Commit 32f144a has been approved by |
bors
commented
Aug 10, 2019
rustdoc: general cleanups This is purely a refactoring, mostly just simplifying some of the code. Commits are best reviewed individually.
bors
commented
Aug 10, 2019
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
This is purely a refactoring, mostly just simplifying some of the code. Commits are best reviewed individually.