Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fix zero-size uninitialized boxes - #65174
Conversation
Requesting a zero-size allocation is not allowed, return a dangling pointer instead. CC rust-lang#63291 (comment)
rust-highfive
commented
Oct 6, 2019
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
alexcrichton
commented
Oct 7, 2019
Looks good to me, thanks! Could this perhaps though check the |
JohnCSimon
commented
Oct 12, 2019
Ping from triage |
SimonSapin
commented
Oct 16, 2019
Done. I’ll take the liberty to carry Alex’s “r=me” from previous comment: @bors r=alexcrichton |
bors
commented
Oct 16, 2019
📌 Commit 352b026 has been approved by |
rust-highfive
commented
Oct 16, 2019
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
RalfJung
commented
Oct 16, 2019
Dang, I missed that when reviewing the original patch. :/ Do the |
SimonSapin
commented
Oct 16, 2019
Heap allocations for |
Fix zero-size uninitialized boxes Requesting a zero-size allocation is not allowed, return a dangling pointer instead. CC rust-lang#63291 (comment)
Centril
commented
Oct 16, 2019
SimonSapin
commented
Oct 18, 2019
Removed the extra trailing newline, and ran a full @bors r=alexcrichton |
bors
commented
Oct 18, 2019
📌 Commit 227db40 has been approved by |
Fix zero-size uninitialized boxes Requesting a zero-size allocation is not allowed, return a dangling pointer instead. CC rust-lang#63291 (comment)
Fix zero-size uninitialized boxes Requesting a zero-size allocation is not allowed, return a dangling pointer instead. CC rust-lang#63291 (comment)
Fix zero-size uninitialized boxes Requesting a zero-size allocation is not allowed, return a dangling pointer instead. CC rust-lang#63291 (comment)
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #65174 (Fix zero-size uninitialized boxes) - #65252 (expand: Simplify expansion of derives) - #65485 (Suppress ICE when validators disagree on `LiveDrop`s in presence of `&mut`) - #65542 (Refer to "associated functions" instead of "static methods") - #65545 (More symbol cleanups) - #65576 (Don't add `argc` and `argv` arguments to `main` on WASI.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Requesting a zero-size allocation is not allowed, return a dangling pointer instead.
CC #63291 (comment)