Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Better documentation for io::Read::read() return value - #72031
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
May 8, 2020
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
May 9, 2020
@bors r+ rollup Thanks! I agree this is a good clarification. |
bors
commented
May 9, 2020
📌 Commit 05fc7fa has been approved by |
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#70834 (Add core::future::{pending,ready}) - rust-lang#71839 (Make BTreeMap::new and BTreeSet::new const) - rust-lang#71890 (Simplify the error Registry methods a little) - rust-lang#71942 (Shrink `LocalDecl`) - rust-lang#71947 (Dead-code pass highlights too much of impl functions) - rust-lang#71981 (Fix `strip-priv-imports` pass name in the rustdoc documentation) - rust-lang#72018 (Fix canonicalization links) - rust-lang#72031 (Better documentation for io::Read::read() return value) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Aims to provide the clarity requested in #70360