Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Particially revert #73771 - #76529
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Sep 9, 2020
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
LeSeulArtichaut
commented
Sep 9, 2020
Maybe cc @GuillaumeGomez? |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Sep 9, 2020
@rust-lang/rustdoc works too. ;) |
|
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Sep 9, 2020
Absolutely. ;) |
jyn514
commented
Sep 9, 2020
well that's odd. |
tesuji
commented
Sep 10, 2020
std/primitive.slice.html has broken links because after this PR, it displays Concat trait implementations. std/primitive.u64.html has a broken link for |
jyn514
commented
Sep 10, 2020
I don't understand, sorry. What do the broken links have to do with the new implementors being shown? I don't see any links to |
tesuji
commented
Sep 10, 2020
To reproduce the issue, one has to build with For usize, the "Read more" link is broken: http://0.0.0.0:8000/std/primitive.usize.html#tymethod.from_u64 For Concat trait under std/primitive.slice: note the rust/library/alloc/src/slice.rs Line 625 in 97eb606 |
jyn514
commented
Sep 10, 2020
Got it, thanks. The broken primitive.slice.html link can't be fixed until #63351 is. I took a look at #from_u64 - they don't actually have a link there: So it seems like rustdoc itself is generating invalid links 🤦 Since this is intended to be backported to beta, I think we should just whitelist the broken links for now. If you want to try and fix the issues in a follow-up commit that would be great :) but I think only the revert should be backported. |
Another candidate: #76571 |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Sep 10, 2020
r? @jyn514 -- seems like you have a better handle than I on these things |
…n514 Ignore rustc_private items from std docs By ignoring rustc_private items for non local impl block, this may fixrust-lang#74672 and fixrust-lang#75588 . This might suppress rust-lang#76529 if it is simple enough for backport.
…n514 Ignore rustc_private items from std docs By ignoring rustc_private items for non local impl block, this may fixrust-lang#74672 and fixrust-lang#75588 . This might suppress rust-lang#76529 if it is simple enough for backport.
…n514 Ignore rustc_private items from std docs By ignoring rustc_private items for non local impl block, this may fixrust-lang#74672 and fixrust-lang#75588 . This might suppress rust-lang#76529 if it is simple enough for backport.
Ignore rustc_private items from std docs By ignoring rustc_private items for non local impl block, this may fixrust-lang#74672 and fixrust-lang#75588 . This might suppress rust-lang#76529 if it is simple enough for backport.
bors
commented
Sep 14, 2020
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #76571) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels: |
jyn514
commented
Sep 14, 2020
I'm going to close this: I think #76571 is a better candidate for backport and we can always re-open it against beta if the rustdoc team decides they don't want to backport 76571. |


Hopefully this should close#75588.
cc #74534