Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Upgrade to measureme 9.0.0 - #77398
Conversation
wesleywiser
commented
Oct 1, 2020
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Oct 1, 2020
I'm pretty sure we can ignore the ap stuff, the duplicate dep there doesn't really matter too much. I imagine the best bet is to deploy this on perf like we did with 0.7, where we run both and whichever works works? One additional bit might be that perf is actually depending on measureme directly these days for the in-browser rendering, so that might complicate things somewhat. I can see a couple solutions:
|
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Oct 3, 2020
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 3, 2020
Awaiting bors try build completion |
bors
commented
Oct 3, 2020
⌛ Trying commit 4e8813fd9ef61348937d3d8cf0523240c96c3988 with merge 87affc7df6cfd30178b8d76557e59bfa505f602f... |
bors
commented
Oct 3, 2020
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions, checks-azure |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 3, 2020
Queued 87affc7df6cfd30178b8d76557e59bfa505f602f with parent 738d4a7, future comparison URL. |
wesleywiser
commented
Oct 3, 2020
Marking this as a draft since we have another |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 3, 2020
Finished benchmarking try commit (87affc7df6cfd30178b8d76557e59bfa505f602f): comparison url. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up. @bors rollup=never |
4e8813f to
567c575Compare567c575 to
edae23aComparewesleywiser
commented
Oct 8, 2020
This is ready for review.
That seems ok to me. We typically don't make that many breaking changes to the on-disk format anymore. I think the last one was about 9 months ago. |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Oct 15, 2020
@bors try @rust-timer queue include=helloworld Just a quick try for a single benchmark, no need to do a full collection. |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 15, 2020
Awaiting bors try build completion |
bors
commented
Oct 15, 2020
⌛ Trying commit edae23a8f50c90337ea93ba39a808e4a035a5cac with merge 87781d93a3879c9931bdafd98741f3a1d2c02191... |
bors
commented
Oct 15, 2020
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions, checks-azure |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 15, 2020
Queued 87781d93a3879c9931bdafd98741f3a1d2c02191 with parent b5c9e24, future comparison URL. |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 16, 2020
Finished benchmarking try commit (87781d93a3879c9931bdafd98741f3a1d2c02191): comparison url. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up. @bors rollup=never |
jonas-schievink
commented
Oct 24, 2020
@bors treeclosed- |
bors
commented
Oct 24, 2020
⌛ Testing commit d84daa1a04f0d927b20caa60bbaab82e2856b3e4 with merge 427c4ae4ddf69632281f399566a64c6bab003f94... |
bors
commented
Oct 24, 2020
💥 Test timed out |
rust-log-analyzer
commented
Oct 24, 2020
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
jonas-schievink
commented
Oct 24, 2020
@bors retry |
bors
commented
Oct 25, 2020
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #78334) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels: |
d84daa1 to
5ac5556Comparewesleywiser
commented
Oct 25, 2020
@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum |
bors
commented
Oct 25, 2020
📌 Commit 5ac5556 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Oct 25, 2020
bors
commented
Oct 25, 2020
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
wesleywiser
commented
Oct 25, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum Thanks for getting the perf.rlo side of this working so we could land it! |
I believe I did this correctly but there's still a reference to
measureme@0.7.1coming fromrustc-ap-rustc_data_structuresand I'm not sure how to resolve that.r? @Mark-Simulacrum
We'll also need to deploy the new version of the tools on perf.rlo.