Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Replace String with Symbol where possible - #80091
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Dec 16, 2020
Some changes occurred in intra-doc-links. cc @jyn514 |
jyn514
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks amazing, thanks so much ❤️
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is weird, not sure why it changed :/ did you run the wrong version of rustfmt maybe?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No idea. I always run my "own" version, which isn't the best idea I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you run x.py fmt it should work correctly.
ea28c77 to
50d221cCompareGuillaumeGomez
commented
Dec 16, 2020
Updated! If it looks fine to you, I'll let you start the perf check. :3 |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Dec 16, 2020
Sorry, can't wait, just want to know! ⏩ @bors try @rust-timer queue |
rust-timer
commented
Dec 16, 2020
Awaiting bors try build completion. |
bors
commented
Dec 16, 2020
⌛ Trying commit 50d221c with merge ed385fcba33dd70047504a3e0c0aadd0106d7e5a... |
bors
commented
Dec 16, 2020
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Dec 16, 2020
Queued ed385fcba33dd70047504a3e0c0aadd0106d7e5a with parent 2ba7ca2, future comparison URL. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
rust-timer
commented
Dec 17, 2020
Finished benchmarking try commit (ed385fcba33dd70047504a3e0c0aadd0106d7e5a): comparison url. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up. @bors rollup=never |
jyn514
commented
Dec 17, 2020
Wow! -4.7% on instructions, -1.3% on max-rss :) Up to -6.2% on wall-times, although that's always variable. |
jyn514
commented
Dec 17, 2020
@bors r+ rollup=never |
bors
commented
Dec 17, 2020
📌 Commit 50d221c has been approved by |
bors
commented
Dec 17, 2020
bors
commented
Dec 17, 2020
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Continue String to Symbol conversion in rustdoc Follow-up of rust-lang#80091. This PR is already big enough so I'll stop here before the next one. r? `@jyn514`
The same as #80047 but on different types. Might be interesting to run some perf comparison.
r? @jyn514