Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
give full path of constraint in suggest_constraining_type_param - #83673
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Mar 30, 2021
r? @lcnr (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
lcnr
commented
Mar 30, 2021
r? @estebank feeling unsure about whether using full paths is actually desirable, but don't have a strong opinion here |
6f74059 to
1f3d049Compareestebank
commented
Mar 30, 2021
Oh! It's a shame that it also affects things in the prelude 🤔 The current behavior means you get two errors but if you apply both suggestions you get to working code. The new behavior means a single step to working code, at the cost of verbosity. @lcnr what do you think about this: lets land this (to reduce fix cycles for users) and revisit this output once we have real "locally accessible paths" for these suggestions where we can reduce the verbosity again. |
lcnr
commented
Mar 30, 2021
👍 |
estebank
commented
Mar 30, 2021
@bors r+ |
bors
commented
Mar 30, 2021
📌 Commit 1f3d049 has been approved by |
…r=estebank give full path of constraint in suggest_constraining_type_param closerust-lang#83513
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Mar 30, 2021
1f3d049 to
316e4eeComparerevert file bless with nll mode
316e4ee to
8f77356Compare0xPoe
commented
Mar 31, 2021
@Dylan-DPC Blessed with nll compare mode. |
0xPoe
commented
Mar 31, 2021
@rustbot modify labels: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-author |
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Mar 31, 2021
@bors r=estebank |
bors
commented
Mar 31, 2021
📌 Commit 8f77356 has been approved by |
rust-log-analyzer
commented
Mar 31, 2021
…r=estebank give full path of constraint in suggest_constraining_type_param closerust-lang#83513
…r=estebank give full path of constraint in suggest_constraining_type_param closerust-lang#83513
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Mar 31, 2021
0xPoe
commented
Apr 1, 2021
@Dylan-DPC I tested both modes again locally with no problems, so I don't know what's wrong, do you have any suggestions? |
0xPoe
commented
Apr 1, 2021
It seems that without my commit, this #83728 PR is also failing because of the same problem? |
0xPoe
commented
Apr 1, 2021
@rustbot modify labels: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-author |
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Apr 1, 2021
let's give it a try once, @bors r=estebank |
bors
commented
Apr 1, 2021
📌 Commit 8f77356 has been approved by |
0xPoe
commented
Apr 1, 2021
Thanks, maybe we can rollup this time without the other PRs that modify the diagnostic information, otherwise it might fail again and we still don't know if the PR is the problem. |
…r=estebank give full path of constraint in suggest_constraining_type_param closerust-lang#83513
…r=estebank give full path of constraint in suggest_constraining_type_param closerust-lang#83513
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#83065 (Rework `std::sys::windows::alloc`) - rust-lang#83478 (rustdoc: Add unstable option to only emit shared/crate-specific files) - rust-lang#83629 (Fix double-drop in `Vec::from_iter(vec.into_iter())` specialization when items drop during panic) - rust-lang#83673 (give full path of constraint in suggest_constraining_type_param) - rust-lang#83755 (Simplify coverage tests) - rust-lang#83757 (2229: Support migration via rustfix) - rust-lang#83771 (Fix stack overflow detection on FreeBSD 11.1+) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

close#83513