Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Improve maybe_uninit_extra docs - #86220
Merged
Merged
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 11, 2021
Contributor
r? @scottmcm (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
RalfJung
commented
Jun 13, 2021
Member
Argh, sorry, GH autocomplete went really wrong here... |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
RalfJung
commented
Jun 14, 2021
Member
r=me with the last wording nit resolved. |
bors
commented
Jun 14, 2021
Collaborator
✌️ @est31 can now approve this pull request |
For reasoning, see rust-lang#63567 (comment)
est31
commented
Jun 14, 2021
MemberAuthor
@bors r=RalfJung rollup |
bors
commented
Jun 14, 2021
Collaborator
📌 Commit 8710258 has been approved by |
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 14, 2021
Improve maybe_uninit_extra docs For reasoning, see rust-lang#63567 (comment)
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 14, 2021
Improve maybe_uninit_extra docs For reasoning, see rust-lang#63567 (comment)
bors added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 15, 2021
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#80269 (Explain non-dropped sender recv in docs) - rust-lang#82179 (Add functions `Duration::try_from_secs_{f32, f64}`) - rust-lang#85608 (Stabilize `ops::ControlFlow` (just the type)) - rust-lang#85792 (Refactor windows sockets impl methods) - rust-lang#86220 (Improve maybe_uninit_extra docs) - rust-lang#86277 (Remove must_use from ALLOWED_ATTRIBUTES) - rust-lang#86285 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer) - rust-lang#86294 (Stabilize {std, core}::prelude::rust_*.) - rust-lang#86306 (Add mailmap entries for myself) - rust-lang#86314 (Remove trailing triple backticks in `mut_keyword` docs) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
JohnTitor added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2021
Split MaybeUninit::write into new feature gate and stabilize it This splits off the `MaybeUninit::write` function from the `maybe_uninit_extra` feature gate into a new `maybe_uninit_write` feature gate and stabilizes it. Earlier work to improve the documentation of the write function: rust-lang#86220 Tracking issue: rust-lang#63567
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For reasoning, see #63567 (comment)