Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Point at overlapping impls when type annotations are needed - #89427
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Oct 1, 2021
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
estebank
commented
Oct 1, 2021
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 1, 2021
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
bors
commented
Oct 1, 2021
⌛ Trying commit ce9b15e5fe151c352daef9a952be011112cfe881 with merge 96d6dfc04cc7ea021ad7b494bfbb0041be4e083c... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
ce9b15e to
a6b9719Compareestebank
commented
Oct 1, 2021
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 1, 2021
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
bors
commented
Oct 1, 2021
⌛ Trying commit a6b97196c4c1ff8acf22d3b2f27848de9c325a4e with merge 19148e7dc43cf0314f81a60dd944631ca719942c... |
petrochenkov
commented
Oct 1, 2021
r? @rust-lang/wg-traits |
petrochenkov
commented
Oct 1, 2021
It didn't work, selecting a random active member. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
bors
commented
Oct 1, 2021
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 1, 2021
Queued 19148e7dc43cf0314f81a60dd944631ca719942c with parent 69eb996, future comparison URL. |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 1, 2021
Finished benchmarking commit (19148e7dc43cf0314f81a60dd944631ca719942c): comparison url. Summary: This change led to moderate relevant improvements 🎉 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never |
jackh726
commented
Oct 1, 2021
Yeah, should be "rust-lang/traits", but it might be prudent to make "wg-traits" an alias for that. |
7c1f014 to
4a85552Compare
nikomatsakis
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this looks good to me! I didn't give it a detailed read, though, so maybe better for @spastorino or others to look a touch more closely at the code.
bors
commented
Oct 8, 2021
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #89576) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
4a85552 to
cb807e7Compareestebank
commented
Oct 14, 2021
@spastorino ping |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here we should try and figure out that T is a type we can infer, while U is not, for a more targeted suggestion.
cb807e7 to
8c2bed8Compareestebank
commented
Oct 24, 2021
@bors r=jackh726 |
bors
commented
Oct 24, 2021
📌 Commit 8c2bed87beb9558feaa310a2dc8d93f67edf2705 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Oct 24, 2021
⌛ Testing commit 8c2bed87beb9558feaa310a2dc8d93f67edf2705 with merge 3296562b6104d82890a18c6ce7073df9032be3f9... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
bors
commented
Oct 24, 2021
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
8c2bed8 to
881a50cCompareestebank
commented
Oct 24, 2021
@bors r=jackh726 |
bors
commented
Oct 24, 2021
📌 Commit 881a50c has been approved by |
bors
commented
Oct 24, 2021
bors
commented
Oct 25, 2021
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 25, 2021
Finished benchmarking commit (41d8c94): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
Address #89254.