Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Reduce use of LocalDefId <-> HirId maps - #90146
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
cjgillot
commented
Oct 22, 2021
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 22, 2021
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
bors
commented
Oct 22, 2021
⌛ Trying commit 437652f1641a199a4822f756bf3ce86f7bbfea49 with merge ba6244813e20a79c9f865108e1add3078beb8799... |
bors
commented
Oct 22, 2021
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 22, 2021
Queued ba6244813e20a79c9f865108e1add3078beb8799 with parent 45b600c, future comparison URL. |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 22, 2021
Finished benchmarking commit (ba6244813e20a79c9f865108e1add3078beb8799): comparison url. Summary: This change led to large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
cjgillot
commented
Oct 27, 2021
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 27, 2021
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
bors
commented
Oct 27, 2021
⌛ Trying commit 6f4cc96 with merge 3c98d5fc58ff609ab72025df0586f8e61b4f96b1... |
bors
commented
Oct 27, 2021
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 27, 2021
Queued 3c98d5fc58ff609ab72025df0586f8e61b4f96b1 with parent dd757b9, future comparison URL. |
rust-timer
commented
Oct 28, 2021
Finished benchmarking commit (3c98d5fc58ff609ab72025df0586f8e61b4f96b1): comparison url. Summary: This change led to large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never |
bors
commented
Nov 28, 2021
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #91230) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
bors
commented
Jan 8, 2022
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #90639) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
nagisa
commented
Jan 15, 2022
I'm happy to r=me this. Please rebase and squash the history a little before merging though. |
cjgillot
commented
Jan 15, 2022
@bors r=nagisa |
bors
commented
Jan 15, 2022
📌 Commit 8617ff0 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Jan 15, 2022
bors
commented
Jan 16, 2022
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Jan 17, 2022
Finished benchmarking commit (f9d61cd): comparison url. Summary: This change led to moderate relevant improvements 🎉 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
This is an attempt to reduce the perf effect of #89278.
r? @ghost