Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
more clippy fixes - #90668
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Nov 7, 2021
r? @jackh726 (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
commented
Nov 7, 2021
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
jyn514
commented
Nov 7, 2021
@bors try @rust-timer queue r=me assuming perf isn't too bad :) |
rust-timer
commented
Nov 7, 2021
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
bors
commented
Nov 7, 2021
⌛ Trying commit 5f58acf7cc6c20f022c63b3917839954d81b7edd with merge a8cc143f16a2f039e5635ec664795b3954ac98df... |
bors
commented
Nov 7, 2021
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Nov 7, 2021
Queued a8cc143f16a2f039e5635ec664795b3954ac98df with parent 90a273b, future comparison URL. |
rust-timer
commented
Nov 7, 2021
Finished benchmarking commit (a8cc143f16a2f039e5635ec664795b3954ac98df): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never |
5f58acf to
5c45455Comparematthiaskrgr
commented
Nov 7, 2021
removed the @bors r=jyn514 |
bors
commented
Nov 7, 2021
📌 Commit 5c45455 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Nov 7, 2021
⌛ Testing commit 5c45455 with merge d519729aacaf4e34857f73222a0227ac97b53626... |
bors
commented
Nov 7, 2021
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
rust-log-analyzer
commented
Nov 7, 2021
jyn514
commented
Nov 7, 2021
🤦 @bors retry |
bors
commented
Nov 7, 2021
bors
commented
Nov 7, 2021
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Nov 8, 2021
Finished benchmarking commit (46b8e74): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
No description provided.