Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Update libc to 0.2.108 - #90681
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Nov 8, 2021
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
JohnTitor
commented
Nov 9, 2021
r? @JohnTitor@bors r+ rollup=iffy in case we have another failure |
bors
commented
Nov 9, 2021
📌 Commit 72ae5a3 has been approved by |
…itor Update libc to 0.2.107 Changelog: https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/releases/tag/0.2.107 Primarily intended to pull in rust-lang/libc@fd331f6 This should help with rust-lang#90044
bors
commented
Nov 10, 2021
⌛ Testing commit 72ae5a3 with merge 04c52485bf309f801b8408b3cfebb9a1adb80c39... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
bors
commented
Nov 10, 2021
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
Scope in Send, Sync for wasi Without this, libc fails during the build of rustc. See: rust-lang/rust#90681 Alternative solution: It's not clear this is necessary for core to finish building, so maybe we should cfg it out in that case, instead?
Scope in Send, Sync for wasi Without this, libc fails during the build of rustc. See rust-lang/rust#90681 This dependency was introduced in #2499. Alternative solution: It's not clear this is necessary for core to finish building, so maybe we should `#[cfg]` it out in that case, instead?
@bors r- blocked by a libc release (>0.2.107) which includes rust-lang/libc#2528 |
bors
commented
Nov 18, 2021
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #90382) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
JohnTitor
commented
Nov 21, 2021
0.2.108 is released. |
bors
commented
Nov 28, 2021
⌛ Testing commit 9a04ae4 with merge 01b7b73a52158e98d6d4053db007300e5c17b524... |
rust-log-analyzer
commented
Nov 28, 2021
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
bors
commented
Nov 28, 2021
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
JohnTitor
commented
Nov 28, 2021
Seems spurious, @bors retry |
bors
commented
Nov 28, 2021
⌛ Testing commit 9a04ae4 with merge f00f0005b1244de9a463e903e54c7f3416e181f6... |
bors
commented
Nov 28, 2021
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
rust-log-analyzer
commented
Nov 28, 2021
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
hkratz
commented
Nov 28, 2021
Spurious LNK1201 #81890 |
JohnTitor
commented
Nov 28, 2021
@bors retry |
bors
commented
Nov 28, 2021
bors
commented
Nov 29, 2021
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Nov 29, 2021
Finished benchmarking commit (350158d): comparison url. Summary: This change led to very large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
Changelog:
https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/releases/tag/0.2.107
https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/releases/tag/0.2.108
Primarily intended to pull in rust-lang/libc@fd331f6
This should help with #90044