Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Ensure stability directives are checked in all cases - #94096
Conversation
lcnr
commented
Feb 18, 2022
are these just the first 7 commits from #93017? and if so, did you change anything meaningful about them after my first review? If not, r=me |
cjgillot
commented
Feb 18, 2022
I did not change anything except re-blessing tests after rebase. |
bors
commented
Feb 18, 2022
📌 Commit 5ff235b has been approved by |
cjgillot
commented
Feb 18, 2022
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
rust-timer
commented
Feb 18, 2022
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
bors
commented
Feb 18, 2022
🙅 Please do not |
cjgillot
commented
Feb 18, 2022
Just in case. |
rust-timer
commented
Feb 18, 2022
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
bors
commented
Feb 18, 2022
⌛ Trying commit 5ff235b with merge 1d32a80a10c46744f5200d5dab9e702510d85418... |
bors
commented
Feb 19, 2022
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Feb 19, 2022
Queued 1d32a80a10c46744f5200d5dab9e702510d85418 with parent b17226f, future comparison URL. |
rust-timer
commented
Feb 19, 2022
Finished benchmarking commit (1d32a80a10c46744f5200d5dab9e702510d85418): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never |
cjgillot
commented
Feb 19, 2022
@bors r=lcnr |
bors
commented
Feb 19, 2022
📌 Commit 5ff235b has been approved by |
cjgillot
commented
Feb 19, 2022
@bors rollup- |
Ensure stability directives are checked in all cases Split off rust-lang#93017 Stability and deprecation were not checked in all cases, for instance if a type error happened. This PR moves the check earlier in the pipeline to ensure the errors are emitted in all cases. r? `@lcnr`
matthiaskrgr
commented
Mar 2, 2022
Looks like tests needs to be reblessed |
cjgillot
commented
Mar 3, 2022
@bors r=lcnr |
bors
commented
Mar 3, 2022
📌 Commit c680d39 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Mar 4, 2022
bors
commented
Mar 4, 2022
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Mar 4, 2022
Finished benchmarking commit (65f6d33): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
Split off #93017
Stability and deprecation were not checked in all cases, for instance if a type error happened.
This PR moves the check earlier in the pipeline to ensure the errors are emitted in all cases.
r? @lcnr