Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Rollup of 6 pull requests - #96015
Merged
Merged
Conversation
overflow in line numbers
locations in scrape examples.
Add missing article to fix "few" (not many) to "a few" (some).
Add a missing article
…illaumeGomez Improve Rustdoc UI for scraped examples with multiline arguments, fix overflow in line numbers This PR improves a few aspects of the scrape examples feature in Rustdoc. * Only function names and not the full call expression are highlighted. * For call-sites with multiline arguments, the minimized code viewer will scroll to the top of the call-site rather than the middle if the argument is larger than the viewer size, ensuring that the function name is visible. * This fixes an issue where the line numbers column had a visible x-scroll bar. r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
Improve error message in case of missing checksum # Fixesrust-lang#94217
Document that DirEntry holds the directory open I had a bug where holding onto DirEntry structs caused file descriptor exhaustion, and thought it would be good to document this.
…898, r=fee1-dead
fix: wrong trait import suggestion for T:
The suggestion to bound `T` had an extra `:`.
```rust
fn foo<T:>(t: T) {
t.clone();
}
```
```
error[E0599]: no method named `clone` found for type parameter `T` in the current scope
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | t.clone();
| ^^^^^ method not found in `T`
|
= help: items from traits can only be used if the type parameter is bounded by the trait
help: the following trait defines an item `clone`, perhaps you need to restrict type parameter `T` with it:
|
1 | fn foo<T: Clone:>(t: T) {
| ~~~~~~~~
```
Fixes: rust-lang#95898Add missing article to fix "few" to "a few". Add missing article to fix "few" (not many) to "a few" (some).
Add a missing article Add a missing article
Dylan-DPC
commented
Apr 13, 2022
MemberAuthor
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
commented
Apr 13, 2022
Collaborator
📌 Commit e95f2db has been approved by |
bors
commented
Apr 13, 2022
Collaborator
bors
commented
Apr 13, 2022
Collaborator
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Apr 13, 2022
Collaborator
Finished benchmarking commit (0d13f6a): comparison url. Summary:
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression Footnotes |
pnkfelix
commented
Apr 21, 2022
Contributor
Visiting for weekly performance triage
@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged |
This was referenced Apr 21, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup