Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
remove function parameters only used in recursion - #96027
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Apr 13, 2022
r? @fee1-dead (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
matthiaskrgr
commented
Apr 13, 2022
out of curiosity |
rust-timer
commented
Apr 13, 2022
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
bors
commented
Apr 13, 2022
⌛ Trying commit 6547eaca3c4bf97815975ff023e65efcd659349f with merge d4095f9ba6b8cdf8a7f31aee0a509015b91e92ec... |
bors
commented
Apr 13, 2022
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Apr 13, 2022
Queued d4095f9ba6b8cdf8a7f31aee0a509015b91e92ec with parent dc4bfcb, future comparison URL. |
rust-timer
commented
Apr 14, 2022
Finished benchmarking commit (d4095f9ba6b8cdf8a7f31aee0a509015b91e92ec): comparison url. Summary:
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Footnotes |
fee1-dead
commented
Apr 14, 2022
@bors r+ |
bors
commented
Apr 14, 2022
📌 Commit 6547eaca3c4bf97815975ff023e65efcd659349f has been approved by |
bors
commented
Apr 14, 2022
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
bors
commented
Apr 14, 2022
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #95928) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
matthiaskrgr
commented
Apr 14, 2022
rebased |
bors
commented
Apr 14, 2022
📌 Commit 6511976 has been approved by |
fee1-dead
commented
Apr 15, 2022
@bors rollup=maybe |
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#94457 (Stabilize `derive_default_enum`) - rust-lang#94461 (Create (unstable) 2024 edition) - rust-lang#94849 (Check var scope if it exist) - rust-lang#95194 (remove find_use_placement) - rust-lang#95749 (only downgrade selection Error -> Ambiguous if type error is in predicate) - rust-lang#96026 (couple of clippy::complexity fixes) - rust-lang#96027 (remove function parameters only used in recursion) - rust-lang#96034 ([test] Add test cases of untested functions for BTreeSet ) - rust-lang#96040 (Use u32 instead of i32 for futexes.) - rust-lang#96062 (docs: Update tests chapter for Termination stabilization) - rust-lang#96065 (Refactor: Use `format-args-capture` and remove unnecessary nested blocks in rustc_typeck) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
No description provided.