Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add a test for issue #33172 - #97085
Conversation
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
wesleywiser
commented
Jun 20, 2022
bors
commented
Jun 20, 2022
📌 Commit 3ea686f has been approved by |
Add a test for issue rust-lang#33172 Adds a test confirming that rust-lang#33172 has been fixed. CDB has some surprising results as it looks like the supposedly unmangled static's symbol name is prefixed when it shouldn't be. r? ``@wesleywiser`` Closesrust-lang#33172
JohnTitor
commented
Jun 21, 2022
Failed in rollup: #98321 (comment) |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
wesleywiser
commented
Jun 23, 2022
@bors r+ |
Add a test for issue rust-lang#33172 Adds a test confirming that rust-lang#33172 has been fixed. CDB has some surprising results as it looks like the supposedly unmangled static's symbol name is prefixed when it shouldn't be. r? ```@wesleywiser``` Closesrust-lang#33172
JohnTitor
commented
Jun 25, 2022
Failed in rollup: #98480 (comment) |
wesleywiser
commented
Jun 27, 2022
Looks like this might be an issue with older gdb version?
We might need to restrict this to a newer version via the |
Co-authored-by: Wesley Wiser <wwiser@gmail.com>
rylev
commented
Aug 4, 2022
@wesleywiser I pushed a change to set the min-version to higher than the default. Unfortunately, I'm having a hard time getting an old version of gdb working with my local test setup to test locally. It would be nice if we could run the debugger suite before it goes into a rollup and potentially fails. |
wesleywiser
commented
Aug 4, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never |
bors
commented
Aug 4, 2022
bors
commented
Aug 5, 2022
bors
commented
Aug 5, 2022
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Aug 5, 2022
Finished benchmarking commit (6bcf01a): comparison url. Instruction count
Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression Footnotes |
wesleywiser
commented
Aug 5, 2022
I think it's safe to ignore this perf result since this PR only adds a debuginfo test and touches no other code so by definition, it couldn't have had an effect on compiler performance. |
Adds a test confirming that #33172 has been fixed.
CDB has some surprising results as it looks like the supposedly unmangled static's symbol name is prefixed when it shouldn't be.
r? @wesleywiser
Closes#33172