Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
update Miri - #97546
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
May 30, 2022
Some changes occured to the Miri submodule cc @rust-lang/miri |
rust-highfive
commented
May 30, 2022
|
oli-obk
commented
May 30, 2022
@bors r+ p=1 |
bors
commented
May 30, 2022
📌 Commit a272c45 has been approved by |
bors
commented
May 30, 2022
⌛ Testing commit a272c45 with merge 42639118b9f34eed46e9befed92b8138fb7aee53... |
bors
commented
May 30, 2022
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
oli-obk
commented
May 30, 2022
Interesting. It looks like a couple of compile-fail tests are not failing miri anymore? |
RalfJung
commented
May 30, 2022
via email
Maybe they are incorrectly being optimized? |
oli-obk
commented
May 30, 2022
just wondered that, too, and found |
oli-obk
commented
May 30, 2022
Hmm, we only ever ran it with mir opt level 4 apparently, not with zero like our test suite does? Line 576 in 855fc02 |
oli-obk
commented
May 30, 2022
@bors r+ |
bors
commented
May 30, 2022
📌 Commit 3c66939 has been approved by |
RalfJung
commented
May 30, 2022
We run it the regular way here: Line 571 in 855fc02 |
| cargo.env("MIRIFLAGS", "-O -Zmir-opt-level=4"); | ||
| if !try_run(builder, &mut cargo) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Now we are just running it twice. :)
RalfJung
commented
May 30, 2022
For now, let's just only run the unoptimized tests here, and leave the optimized tests for Miri CI. @bors r=oli-obk |
bors
commented
May 30, 2022
📌 Commit 962d54e has been approved by |
bors
commented
May 30, 2022
bors
commented
May 30, 2022
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Tested on commit rust-lang/rust@946a88a. Direct link to PR: <rust-lang/rust#97546> 🎉 miri on windows: build-fail → test-pass (cc @eddyb@oli-obk@RalfJung). 🎉 miri on linux: build-fail → test-pass (cc @eddyb@oli-obk@RalfJung).
rust-timer
commented
May 30, 2022
Finished benchmarking commit (946a88a): comparison url. Instruction count
Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression Footnotes |
First update with the new ui test suite, let's hope this all works. :)
r? @oli-obk
Fixes#97486