Support lint expectations for `--force-warn` lints (RFC 2383) by xFrednet · Pull Request #97757 · rust-lang/rust

xFrednet · 2022-06-05T10:53:04Z

Rustc has a --force-warn flag, which overrides lint level attributes and forces the diagnostics to always be warn. This means, that for lint expectations, the diagnostic can't be suppressed as usual. This also means that the expectation would not be fulfilled, even if a lint had been triggered in the expected scope.

This PR now also tracks the expectation ID in the ForceWarn level. I've also made some minor adjustments, to possibly catch more bugs and make the whole implementation more robust.

This will probably conflict with #97718. That PR should ideally be reviewed and merged first. The conflict itself will be trivial to fix.

r? @wesleywiser

cc: @flip1995 since you've helped with the initial review and also discussed this topic with me. 🙃

Follow-up of: #87835

Issue: #85549

Yeah, and that's it.

rust-highfive · 2022-06-05T10:53:06Z

Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt.

cc @rust-lang/rustfmt

bors · 2022-06-05T12:59:17Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 8608dd3a0505ab79dd32b8873a7df850c163b711 (8608dd3a0505ab79dd32b8873a7df850c163b711)

rust-timer · 2022-06-05T14:29:55Z

Finished benchmarking commit (8608dd3a0505ab79dd32b8873a7df850c163b711): comparison url.

Instruction count

Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
Secondary benchmarks: no relevant changes found

	mean¹	max	count²
Regressions 😿 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Regressions 😿 (secondary)	N/A	N/A	0
Improvements 🎉 (primary)	-0.6%	-0.6%	1
Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	N/A	N/A	0
All 😿🎉 (primary)	-0.6%	-0.6%	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
Secondary benchmarks: mixed results

	mean¹	max	count²
Regressions 😿 (primary)	3.8%	3.8%	1
Regressions 😿 (secondary)	3.4%	4.1%	2
Improvements 🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	-3.7%	-3.7%	1
All 😿🎉 (primary)	3.8%	3.8%	1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

the arithmetic mean of the percent change↩↩²
number of relevant changes↩↩²

rust-timer · 2022-06-05T23:43:49Z

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

xFrednet · 2022-06-05T23:47:34Z

It looks like hiding the comment triggered rust-timer again. :/

xFrednet · 2022-06-10T19:51:14Z

Alright, I've rebased on master. This PR should also be ready for review now. The performance run should still be valid.

As a side note, I love how stable the CI is. I can just rebase on master and expect everything to be green. This is so beautiful!

flip1995

Only a few comments about the documentation and a missing test. Impl LGTM

xFrednet · 2022-06-14T05:42:13Z

Nice catches, thank you for the review @flip1995!

flip1995

LGTM. Since it touches the compiler I'll leave the final r+ to Wesley again.

wesleywiser

Great work!

r=me with that one nit addressed

xFrednet · 2022-06-16T06:23:08Z

Awesome, thank you for the review! I think we have two smaller things that need to be updated, and then this feature should be complete 🥳

@bors r=wesleywiser,flip1995 rollup=always

bors · 2022-06-16T06:23:09Z

📌 Commit 8527a3d has been approved by wesleywiser,flip1995

…askrgr Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#97757 (Support lint expectations for `--force-warn` lints (RFC 2383)) - rust-lang#98125 (Entry and_modify doc) - rust-lang#98137 (debuginfo: Fix NatVis for Rc and Arc with unsized pointees.) - rust-lang#98147 (Make #[cfg(bootstrap)] not error in proc macros on later stages ) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

…-warn, r=wesleywiser,flip1995 Support lint expectations for `--force-warn` lints (RFC 2383) Rustc has a `--force-warn` flag, which overrides lint level attributes and forces the diagnostics to always be warn. This means, that for lint expectations, the diagnostic can't be suppressed as usual. This also means that the expectation would not be fulfilled, even if a lint had been triggered in the expected scope. This PR now also tracks the expectation ID in the `ForceWarn` level. I've also made some minor adjustments, to possibly catch more bugs and make the whole implementation more robust. This will probably conflict with rust-lang#97718. That PR should ideally be reviewed and merged first. The conflict itself will be trivial to fix. --- r? `@wesleywiser` cc: `@flip1995` since you've helped with the initial review and also discussed this topic with me. 🙃 Follow-up of: rust-lang#87835 Issue: rust-lang#85549 Yeah, and that's it.

rust-highfive assigned wesleywiser Jun 5, 2022

rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 5, 2022

rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 5, 2022

This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sign in to view

xFrednet mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2022
Implement expect attribute from RFC 2383, "Lint Reasons RFC" #85549
Closed
9 tasks

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 5, 2022

This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sign in to view

rust-lang deleted a comment from rust-timer Jun 5, 2022

This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sign in to view

rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 5, 2022

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 5, 2022

xFrednet force-pushed the rfc-2383-expect-with-force-warn branch from 61a746c to ebbe09cCompare June 10, 2022 18:59

flip1995 reviewed Jun 13, 2022
View reviewed changes

Comment threadcompiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment threadcompiler/rustc_lint/src/levels.rs Outdated
Comment threadcompiler/rustc_lint/src/levels.rs Outdated

xFrednet force-pushed the rfc-2383-expect-with-force-warn branch from ebbe09c to 16ecd42Compare June 14, 2022 05:41

flip1995 approved these changes Jun 14, 2022
View reviewed changes

Comment threadsrc/test/ui/lint/rfc-2383-lint-reason/force_warn_expected_lints_unfulfilled.rs Outdated

wesleywiser approved these changes Jun 15, 2022
View reviewed changes

Comment threadcompiler/rustc_lint/src/levels.rs Outdated

Support lint expectations for --force-warn lints (RFC 2383)
8527a3d

xFrednet force-pushed the rfc-2383-expect-with-force-warn branch from 16ecd42 to 8527a3dCompare June 16, 2022 06:17

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 16, 2022

matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Jun 16, 2022
Rollup of 4 pull requests #98161
Merged

bors merged commit 95be954 into rust-lang:masterJun 16, 2022

rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone Jun 16, 2022

xFrednet deleted the rfc-2383-expect-with-force-warn branch June 16, 2022 10:16

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Conversation

xFrednet commented Jun 5, 2022

Uh oh!

rust-highfive commented Jun 5, 2022

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as off-topic.

This comment was marked as off-topic.

This comment was marked as off-topic.

This comment was marked as off-topic.

bors commented Jun 5, 2022

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as off-topic.

rust-timer commented Jun 5, 2022

Instruction count

Max RSS (memory usage)

Cycles

Footnotes

Uh oh!

rust-timer commented Jun 5, 2022

Uh oh!

xFrednet commented Jun 5, 2022• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

xFrednet commented Jun 10, 2022

Uh oh!

flip1995 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

xFrednet commented Jun 14, 2022

Uh oh!

flip1995 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

wesleywiser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

xFrednet commented Jun 16, 2022

Uh oh!

bors commented Jun 16, 2022

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

7 participants

xFrednet commented Jun 5, 2022•
edited
Loading