Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Update measureme to the latest version - #98471
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Jun 24, 2022
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Jun 25, 2022
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
rust-timer
commented
Jun 25, 2022
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
bors
commented
Jun 25, 2022
⌛ Trying commit 03904bbcafd24ea2ba5b3dd99ae62c9da4f83691 with merge 1542ac21c659985d94b05268c55e187570538a31... |
bors
commented
Jun 25, 2022
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Jun 25, 2022
Queued 1542ac21c659985d94b05268c55e187570538a31 with parent fdca237, future comparison URL. |
rust-timer
commented
Jun 25, 2022
Finished benchmarking commit (1542ac21c659985d94b05268c55e187570538a31): comparison url. Instruction count
Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never Footnotes |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Jun 25, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never |
bors
commented
Jun 25, 2022
📌 Commit 03904bbcafd24ea2ba5b3dd99ae62c9da4f83691 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Jun 26, 2022
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #98518) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
03904bb to
3f4d756Compare3f4d756 to
6108caaComparewesleywiser
commented
Jun 27, 2022
Rebased and resolved merge conflict. |
klensy
commented
Jul 8, 2022
Looks like that one lost r+ on rebasing. |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Jul 23, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never |
bors
commented
Jul 23, 2022
bors
commented
Jul 23, 2022
bors
commented
Jul 23, 2022
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Jul 23, 2022
Finished benchmarking commit (0e7c843): comparison url. Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression Footnotes |
No description provided.