Skip to content

Parallel Processing - #1

Open
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master
Open

Parallel Processing#1
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master

Conversation

@lsgos

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR adds parallel processing to the DataProcessor part of PulsarFeatureLab. Clearly processing multiple files is embarrassingly parallel, so this does not take much work. Using multiprocessing means the code inside DataProcessor needs to be refactored a bit, but since all the processing code is encapsulated in the candidate class no changes need to be made to this.
On a machine with multiple cores, the speedup given by this change is pretty good: processing 11,000,000 htru2 datafiles with 32 cores took almost 16 hours with the current code, whereas this fork reduces this to more like 2 and a half.
On the negative side, as it stands it makes the exception reporting slightly less good: it can report the file where the exception occurred and the type of exception, but I haven't implemented a way to print a full stack trace as before.
Also, since multiprocessing is new in python 2.6, this would raise the requirements for this program from python 2.4 to 2.6. Given that 2.7 is standard on most distributions these days this shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Finally, some functions had to be moved outside the class because multiprocessing is only able to deal with pickle-able objects. This is slightly less neat but I don't really think it hurts the clarity of the code.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@lsgos
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Parallel Processing by lsgos · Pull Request #1 · scienceguyrob/PulsarFeatureLab · GitHub
Skip to content

Parallel Processing - #1

Open
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master
Open

Parallel Processing#1
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master

Conversation

@lsgos

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR adds parallel processing to the DataProcessor part of PulsarFeatureLab. Clearly processing multiple files is embarrassingly parallel, so this does not take much work. Using multiprocessing means the code inside DataProcessor needs to be refactored a bit, but since all the processing code is encapsulated in the candidate class no changes need to be made to this.
On a machine with multiple cores, the speedup given by this change is pretty good: processing 11,000,000 htru2 datafiles with 32 cores took almost 16 hours with the current code, whereas this fork reduces this to more like 2 and a half.
On the negative side, as it stands it makes the exception reporting slightly less good: it can report the file where the exception occurred and the type of exception, but I haven't implemented a way to print a full stack trace as before.
Also, since multiprocessing is new in python 2.6, this would raise the requirements for this program from python 2.4 to 2.6. Given that 2.7 is standard on most distributions these days this shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Finally, some functions had to be moved outside the class because multiprocessing is only able to deal with pickle-able objects. This is slightly less neat but I don't really think it hurts the clarity of the code.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@lsgos
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Parallel Processing by lsgos · Pull Request #1 · scienceguyrob/PulsarFeatureLab · GitHub
Skip to content

Parallel Processing - #1

Open
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master
Open

Parallel Processing#1
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master

Conversation

@lsgos

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR adds parallel processing to the DataProcessor part of PulsarFeatureLab. Clearly processing multiple files is embarrassingly parallel, so this does not take much work. Using multiprocessing means the code inside DataProcessor needs to be refactored a bit, but since all the processing code is encapsulated in the candidate class no changes need to be made to this.
On a machine with multiple cores, the speedup given by this change is pretty good: processing 11,000,000 htru2 datafiles with 32 cores took almost 16 hours with the current code, whereas this fork reduces this to more like 2 and a half.
On the negative side, as it stands it makes the exception reporting slightly less good: it can report the file where the exception occurred and the type of exception, but I haven't implemented a way to print a full stack trace as before.
Also, since multiprocessing is new in python 2.6, this would raise the requirements for this program from python 2.4 to 2.6. Given that 2.7 is standard on most distributions these days this shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Finally, some functions had to be moved outside the class because multiprocessing is only able to deal with pickle-able objects. This is slightly less neat but I don't really think it hurts the clarity of the code.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@lsgos
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Parallel Processing by lsgos · Pull Request #1 · scienceguyrob/PulsarFeatureLab · GitHub
Skip to content

Parallel Processing - #1

Open
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master
Open

Parallel Processing#1
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master

Conversation

@lsgos

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR adds parallel processing to the DataProcessor part of PulsarFeatureLab. Clearly processing multiple files is embarrassingly parallel, so this does not take much work. Using multiprocessing means the code inside DataProcessor needs to be refactored a bit, but since all the processing code is encapsulated in the candidate class no changes need to be made to this.
On a machine with multiple cores, the speedup given by this change is pretty good: processing 11,000,000 htru2 datafiles with 32 cores took almost 16 hours with the current code, whereas this fork reduces this to more like 2 and a half.
On the negative side, as it stands it makes the exception reporting slightly less good: it can report the file where the exception occurred and the type of exception, but I haven't implemented a way to print a full stack trace as before.
Also, since multiprocessing is new in python 2.6, this would raise the requirements for this program from python 2.4 to 2.6. Given that 2.7 is standard on most distributions these days this shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Finally, some functions had to be moved outside the class because multiprocessing is only able to deal with pickle-able objects. This is slightly less neat but I don't really think it hurts the clarity of the code.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@lsgos
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Parallel Processing by lsgos · Pull Request #1 · scienceguyrob/PulsarFeatureLab · GitHub
Skip to content

Parallel Processing - #1

Open
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master
Open

Parallel Processing#1
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master

Conversation

@lsgos

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR adds parallel processing to the DataProcessor part of PulsarFeatureLab. Clearly processing multiple files is embarrassingly parallel, so this does not take much work. Using multiprocessing means the code inside DataProcessor needs to be refactored a bit, but since all the processing code is encapsulated in the candidate class no changes need to be made to this.
On a machine with multiple cores, the speedup given by this change is pretty good: processing 11,000,000 htru2 datafiles with 32 cores took almost 16 hours with the current code, whereas this fork reduces this to more like 2 and a half.
On the negative side, as it stands it makes the exception reporting slightly less good: it can report the file where the exception occurred and the type of exception, but I haven't implemented a way to print a full stack trace as before.
Also, since multiprocessing is new in python 2.6, this would raise the requirements for this program from python 2.4 to 2.6. Given that 2.7 is standard on most distributions these days this shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Finally, some functions had to be moved outside the class because multiprocessing is only able to deal with pickle-able objects. This is slightly less neat but I don't really think it hurts the clarity of the code.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@lsgos
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Parallel Processing by lsgos · Pull Request #1 · scienceguyrob/PulsarFeatureLab · GitHub
Skip to content

Parallel Processing - #1

Open
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master
Open

Parallel Processing#1
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master

Conversation

@lsgos

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR adds parallel processing to the DataProcessor part of PulsarFeatureLab. Clearly processing multiple files is embarrassingly parallel, so this does not take much work. Using multiprocessing means the code inside DataProcessor needs to be refactored a bit, but since all the processing code is encapsulated in the candidate class no changes need to be made to this.
On a machine with multiple cores, the speedup given by this change is pretty good: processing 11,000,000 htru2 datafiles with 32 cores took almost 16 hours with the current code, whereas this fork reduces this to more like 2 and a half.
On the negative side, as it stands it makes the exception reporting slightly less good: it can report the file where the exception occurred and the type of exception, but I haven't implemented a way to print a full stack trace as before.
Also, since multiprocessing is new in python 2.6, this would raise the requirements for this program from python 2.4 to 2.6. Given that 2.7 is standard on most distributions these days this shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Finally, some functions had to be moved outside the class because multiprocessing is only able to deal with pickle-able objects. This is slightly less neat but I don't really think it hurts the clarity of the code.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@lsgos
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Parallel Processing by lsgos · Pull Request #1 · scienceguyrob/PulsarFeatureLab · GitHub
Skip to content

Parallel Processing - #1

Open
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master
Open

Parallel Processing#1
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master

Conversation

@lsgos

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR adds parallel processing to the DataProcessor part of PulsarFeatureLab. Clearly processing multiple files is embarrassingly parallel, so this does not take much work. Using multiprocessing means the code inside DataProcessor needs to be refactored a bit, but since all the processing code is encapsulated in the candidate class no changes need to be made to this.
On a machine with multiple cores, the speedup given by this change is pretty good: processing 11,000,000 htru2 datafiles with 32 cores took almost 16 hours with the current code, whereas this fork reduces this to more like 2 and a half.
On the negative side, as it stands it makes the exception reporting slightly less good: it can report the file where the exception occurred and the type of exception, but I haven't implemented a way to print a full stack trace as before.
Also, since multiprocessing is new in python 2.6, this would raise the requirements for this program from python 2.4 to 2.6. Given that 2.7 is standard on most distributions these days this shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Finally, some functions had to be moved outside the class because multiprocessing is only able to deal with pickle-able objects. This is slightly less neat but I don't really think it hurts the clarity of the code.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@lsgos
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Parallel Processing by lsgos · Pull Request #1 · scienceguyrob/PulsarFeatureLab · GitHub
Skip to content

Parallel Processing - #1

Open
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master
Open

Parallel Processing#1
lsgos wants to merge 14 commits into
scienceguyrob:masterfrom
lsgos:master

Conversation

@lsgos

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR adds parallel processing to the DataProcessor part of PulsarFeatureLab. Clearly processing multiple files is embarrassingly parallel, so this does not take much work. Using multiprocessing means the code inside DataProcessor needs to be refactored a bit, but since all the processing code is encapsulated in the candidate class no changes need to be made to this.
On a machine with multiple cores, the speedup given by this change is pretty good: processing 11,000,000 htru2 datafiles with 32 cores took almost 16 hours with the current code, whereas this fork reduces this to more like 2 and a half.
On the negative side, as it stands it makes the exception reporting slightly less good: it can report the file where the exception occurred and the type of exception, but I haven't implemented a way to print a full stack trace as before.
Also, since multiprocessing is new in python 2.6, this would raise the requirements for this program from python 2.4 to 2.6. Given that 2.7 is standard on most distributions these days this shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Finally, some functions had to be moved outside the class because multiprocessing is only able to deal with pickle-able objects. This is slightly less neat but I don't really think it hurts the clarity of the code.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@lsgos