Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset - #296

Merged
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition
Nov 23, 2021
Merged

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset#296
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition

Conversation

@JoshuaSYX

@JoshuaSYXJoshuaSYX commented Nov 1, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi Shakes,

Please review this pull request. My chosen task was Image Segmentation using ISIC Melanoma Dataset using an Improved UNET Model. The number of epochs used was 30, and an average dice coefficient score obtained is 0.94. A description for the attached files are included.

  • README.md: Contains useful information about the project
  • driver.py: Contains the preprocessing functions, training loop and dice coefficient score calculation
  • model.py: Contains the architecture of the model

Thank you!
Joshua Yu Xuan Soo
S4571796

@wooboyeong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

README

  • Please report average DSC for test set in README

General Comments

  • Code OK for EASY
  • Commit messages OK
  • Pull request OK

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

TF/Torch Usage

Adequate use and implementation

Good Practice (Design/Commenting)

Good spacing and comments
Header blocks

Algorithm

Driver Script present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage
Module present
No Data leakage
Difficulty: Easy -10

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages
Progressive commits used

Documentation

Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
Please remove model files, these will clog up the repository. Your pull request will not be merged until they are removed. Feedback marks will be awarded when these are removed. -2
Request Description OK

@JoshuaSYX

JoshuaSYX commented Nov 22, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I think I ran into a slight error, I posted it on Edstem but I will copy it here as well.

I was attempting to fix my project as per the required feedback, but I believed I accidentally pressed on "Fetch Upstream", and my repository on Github was updated but my local repository is not. I only noticed this afterwards and I am now unable to perform any git operations since the 2 repositories are different.

Is there any advice on how to fix this? Or if possible can I make an entirely new submission because I am unsure on what I should do at this point.

As you can refer above, the 3 "Merge branch __ into __" were not supposed to happen.

Thanks!

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Model files are still present though for some reason. Not sure what that error is I'm afraid. Feedback attempted so will give you the marks, but can't merge until solved.

@JoshuaSYX

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I managed to fix the problem. As per requested by Boyeong and you, I have added the Dice Score Coefficient in the README file as well as removed the model file that would clog up the repository. Please have a look when you are available.

Thank you!

@shakes76
shakes76 merged commit 15666bd into shakes76:topic-recognitionNov 23, 2021
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@JoshuaSYX@wooboyeong@shakes76@nathasha-naranpanawa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset - #296

Merged
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition
Nov 23, 2021
Merged

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset#296
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition

Conversation

@JoshuaSYX

@JoshuaSYXJoshuaSYX commented Nov 1, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi Shakes,

Please review this pull request. My chosen task was Image Segmentation using ISIC Melanoma Dataset using an Improved UNET Model. The number of epochs used was 30, and an average dice coefficient score obtained is 0.94. A description for the attached files are included.

  • README.md: Contains useful information about the project
  • driver.py: Contains the preprocessing functions, training loop and dice coefficient score calculation
  • model.py: Contains the architecture of the model

Thank you!
Joshua Yu Xuan Soo
S4571796

@wooboyeong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

README

  • Please report average DSC for test set in README

General Comments

  • Code OK for EASY
  • Commit messages OK
  • Pull request OK

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

TF/Torch Usage

Adequate use and implementation

Good Practice (Design/Commenting)

Good spacing and comments
Header blocks

Algorithm

Driver Script present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage
Module present
No Data leakage
Difficulty: Easy -10

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages
Progressive commits used

Documentation

Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
Please remove model files, these will clog up the repository. Your pull request will not be merged until they are removed. Feedback marks will be awarded when these are removed. -2
Request Description OK

@JoshuaSYX

JoshuaSYX commented Nov 22, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I think I ran into a slight error, I posted it on Edstem but I will copy it here as well.

I was attempting to fix my project as per the required feedback, but I believed I accidentally pressed on "Fetch Upstream", and my repository on Github was updated but my local repository is not. I only noticed this afterwards and I am now unable to perform any git operations since the 2 repositories are different.

Is there any advice on how to fix this? Or if possible can I make an entirely new submission because I am unsure on what I should do at this point.

As you can refer above, the 3 "Merge branch __ into __" were not supposed to happen.

Thanks!

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Model files are still present though for some reason. Not sure what that error is I'm afraid. Feedback attempted so will give you the marks, but can't merge until solved.

@JoshuaSYX

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I managed to fix the problem. As per requested by Boyeong and you, I have added the Dice Score Coefficient in the README file as well as removed the model file that would clog up the repository. Please have a look when you are available.

Thank you!

@shakes76
shakes76 merged commit 15666bd into shakes76:topic-recognitionNov 23, 2021
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@JoshuaSYX@wooboyeong@shakes76@nathasha-naranpanawa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset - #296

Merged
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition
Nov 23, 2021
Merged

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset#296
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition

Conversation

@JoshuaSYX

@JoshuaSYXJoshuaSYX commented Nov 1, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi Shakes,

Please review this pull request. My chosen task was Image Segmentation using ISIC Melanoma Dataset using an Improved UNET Model. The number of epochs used was 30, and an average dice coefficient score obtained is 0.94. A description for the attached files are included.

  • README.md: Contains useful information about the project
  • driver.py: Contains the preprocessing functions, training loop and dice coefficient score calculation
  • model.py: Contains the architecture of the model

Thank you!
Joshua Yu Xuan Soo
S4571796

@wooboyeong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

README

  • Please report average DSC for test set in README

General Comments

  • Code OK for EASY
  • Commit messages OK
  • Pull request OK

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

TF/Torch Usage

Adequate use and implementation

Good Practice (Design/Commenting)

Good spacing and comments
Header blocks

Algorithm

Driver Script present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage
Module present
No Data leakage
Difficulty: Easy -10

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages
Progressive commits used

Documentation

Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
Please remove model files, these will clog up the repository. Your pull request will not be merged until they are removed. Feedback marks will be awarded when these are removed. -2
Request Description OK

@JoshuaSYX

JoshuaSYX commented Nov 22, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I think I ran into a slight error, I posted it on Edstem but I will copy it here as well.

I was attempting to fix my project as per the required feedback, but I believed I accidentally pressed on "Fetch Upstream", and my repository on Github was updated but my local repository is not. I only noticed this afterwards and I am now unable to perform any git operations since the 2 repositories are different.

Is there any advice on how to fix this? Or if possible can I make an entirely new submission because I am unsure on what I should do at this point.

As you can refer above, the 3 "Merge branch __ into __" were not supposed to happen.

Thanks!

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Model files are still present though for some reason. Not sure what that error is I'm afraid. Feedback attempted so will give you the marks, but can't merge until solved.

@JoshuaSYX

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I managed to fix the problem. As per requested by Boyeong and you, I have added the Dice Score Coefficient in the README file as well as removed the model file that would clog up the repository. Please have a look when you are available.

Thank you!

@shakes76
shakes76 merged commit 15666bd into shakes76:topic-recognitionNov 23, 2021
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@JoshuaSYX@wooboyeong@shakes76@nathasha-naranpanawa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset - #296

Merged
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition
Nov 23, 2021
Merged

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset#296
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition

Conversation

@JoshuaSYX

@JoshuaSYXJoshuaSYX commented Nov 1, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi Shakes,

Please review this pull request. My chosen task was Image Segmentation using ISIC Melanoma Dataset using an Improved UNET Model. The number of epochs used was 30, and an average dice coefficient score obtained is 0.94. A description for the attached files are included.

  • README.md: Contains useful information about the project
  • driver.py: Contains the preprocessing functions, training loop and dice coefficient score calculation
  • model.py: Contains the architecture of the model

Thank you!
Joshua Yu Xuan Soo
S4571796

@wooboyeong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

README

  • Please report average DSC for test set in README

General Comments

  • Code OK for EASY
  • Commit messages OK
  • Pull request OK

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

TF/Torch Usage

Adequate use and implementation

Good Practice (Design/Commenting)

Good spacing and comments
Header blocks

Algorithm

Driver Script present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage
Module present
No Data leakage
Difficulty: Easy -10

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages
Progressive commits used

Documentation

Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
Please remove model files, these will clog up the repository. Your pull request will not be merged until they are removed. Feedback marks will be awarded when these are removed. -2
Request Description OK

@JoshuaSYX

JoshuaSYX commented Nov 22, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I think I ran into a slight error, I posted it on Edstem but I will copy it here as well.

I was attempting to fix my project as per the required feedback, but I believed I accidentally pressed on "Fetch Upstream", and my repository on Github was updated but my local repository is not. I only noticed this afterwards and I am now unable to perform any git operations since the 2 repositories are different.

Is there any advice on how to fix this? Or if possible can I make an entirely new submission because I am unsure on what I should do at this point.

As you can refer above, the 3 "Merge branch __ into __" were not supposed to happen.

Thanks!

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Model files are still present though for some reason. Not sure what that error is I'm afraid. Feedback attempted so will give you the marks, but can't merge until solved.

@JoshuaSYX

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I managed to fix the problem. As per requested by Boyeong and you, I have added the Dice Score Coefficient in the README file as well as removed the model file that would clog up the repository. Please have a look when you are available.

Thank you!

@shakes76
shakes76 merged commit 15666bd into shakes76:topic-recognitionNov 23, 2021
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@JoshuaSYX@wooboyeong@shakes76@nathasha-naranpanawa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset - #296

Merged
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition
Nov 23, 2021
Merged

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset#296
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition

Conversation

@JoshuaSYX

@JoshuaSYXJoshuaSYX commented Nov 1, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi Shakes,

Please review this pull request. My chosen task was Image Segmentation using ISIC Melanoma Dataset using an Improved UNET Model. The number of epochs used was 30, and an average dice coefficient score obtained is 0.94. A description for the attached files are included.

  • README.md: Contains useful information about the project
  • driver.py: Contains the preprocessing functions, training loop and dice coefficient score calculation
  • model.py: Contains the architecture of the model

Thank you!
Joshua Yu Xuan Soo
S4571796

@wooboyeong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

README

  • Please report average DSC for test set in README

General Comments

  • Code OK for EASY
  • Commit messages OK
  • Pull request OK

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

TF/Torch Usage

Adequate use and implementation

Good Practice (Design/Commenting)

Good spacing and comments
Header blocks

Algorithm

Driver Script present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage
Module present
No Data leakage
Difficulty: Easy -10

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages
Progressive commits used

Documentation

Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
Please remove model files, these will clog up the repository. Your pull request will not be merged until they are removed. Feedback marks will be awarded when these are removed. -2
Request Description OK

@JoshuaSYX

JoshuaSYX commented Nov 22, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I think I ran into a slight error, I posted it on Edstem but I will copy it here as well.

I was attempting to fix my project as per the required feedback, but I believed I accidentally pressed on "Fetch Upstream", and my repository on Github was updated but my local repository is not. I only noticed this afterwards and I am now unable to perform any git operations since the 2 repositories are different.

Is there any advice on how to fix this? Or if possible can I make an entirely new submission because I am unsure on what I should do at this point.

As you can refer above, the 3 "Merge branch __ into __" were not supposed to happen.

Thanks!

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Model files are still present though for some reason. Not sure what that error is I'm afraid. Feedback attempted so will give you the marks, but can't merge until solved.

@JoshuaSYX

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I managed to fix the problem. As per requested by Boyeong and you, I have added the Dice Score Coefficient in the README file as well as removed the model file that would clog up the repository. Please have a look when you are available.

Thank you!

@shakes76
shakes76 merged commit 15666bd into shakes76:topic-recognitionNov 23, 2021
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@JoshuaSYX@wooboyeong@shakes76@nathasha-naranpanawa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset - #296

Merged
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition
Nov 23, 2021
Merged

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset#296
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition

Conversation

@JoshuaSYX

@JoshuaSYXJoshuaSYX commented Nov 1, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi Shakes,

Please review this pull request. My chosen task was Image Segmentation using ISIC Melanoma Dataset using an Improved UNET Model. The number of epochs used was 30, and an average dice coefficient score obtained is 0.94. A description for the attached files are included.

  • README.md: Contains useful information about the project
  • driver.py: Contains the preprocessing functions, training loop and dice coefficient score calculation
  • model.py: Contains the architecture of the model

Thank you!
Joshua Yu Xuan Soo
S4571796

@wooboyeong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

README

  • Please report average DSC for test set in README

General Comments

  • Code OK for EASY
  • Commit messages OK
  • Pull request OK

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

TF/Torch Usage

Adequate use and implementation

Good Practice (Design/Commenting)

Good spacing and comments
Header blocks

Algorithm

Driver Script present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage
Module present
No Data leakage
Difficulty: Easy -10

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages
Progressive commits used

Documentation

Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
Please remove model files, these will clog up the repository. Your pull request will not be merged until they are removed. Feedback marks will be awarded when these are removed. -2
Request Description OK

@JoshuaSYX

JoshuaSYX commented Nov 22, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I think I ran into a slight error, I posted it on Edstem but I will copy it here as well.

I was attempting to fix my project as per the required feedback, but I believed I accidentally pressed on "Fetch Upstream", and my repository on Github was updated but my local repository is not. I only noticed this afterwards and I am now unable to perform any git operations since the 2 repositories are different.

Is there any advice on how to fix this? Or if possible can I make an entirely new submission because I am unsure on what I should do at this point.

As you can refer above, the 3 "Merge branch __ into __" were not supposed to happen.

Thanks!

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Model files are still present though for some reason. Not sure what that error is I'm afraid. Feedback attempted so will give you the marks, but can't merge until solved.

@JoshuaSYX

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I managed to fix the problem. As per requested by Boyeong and you, I have added the Dice Score Coefficient in the README file as well as removed the model file that would clog up the repository. Please have a look when you are available.

Thank you!

@shakes76
shakes76 merged commit 15666bd into shakes76:topic-recognitionNov 23, 2021
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@JoshuaSYX@wooboyeong@shakes76@nathasha-naranpanawa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset - #296

Merged
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition
Nov 23, 2021
Merged

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset#296
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition

Conversation

@JoshuaSYX

@JoshuaSYXJoshuaSYX commented Nov 1, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi Shakes,

Please review this pull request. My chosen task was Image Segmentation using ISIC Melanoma Dataset using an Improved UNET Model. The number of epochs used was 30, and an average dice coefficient score obtained is 0.94. A description for the attached files are included.

  • README.md: Contains useful information about the project
  • driver.py: Contains the preprocessing functions, training loop and dice coefficient score calculation
  • model.py: Contains the architecture of the model

Thank you!
Joshua Yu Xuan Soo
S4571796

@wooboyeong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

README

  • Please report average DSC for test set in README

General Comments

  • Code OK for EASY
  • Commit messages OK
  • Pull request OK

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

TF/Torch Usage

Adequate use and implementation

Good Practice (Design/Commenting)

Good spacing and comments
Header blocks

Algorithm

Driver Script present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage
Module present
No Data leakage
Difficulty: Easy -10

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages
Progressive commits used

Documentation

Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
Please remove model files, these will clog up the repository. Your pull request will not be merged until they are removed. Feedback marks will be awarded when these are removed. -2
Request Description OK

@JoshuaSYX

JoshuaSYX commented Nov 22, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I think I ran into a slight error, I posted it on Edstem but I will copy it here as well.

I was attempting to fix my project as per the required feedback, but I believed I accidentally pressed on "Fetch Upstream", and my repository on Github was updated but my local repository is not. I only noticed this afterwards and I am now unable to perform any git operations since the 2 repositories are different.

Is there any advice on how to fix this? Or if possible can I make an entirely new submission because I am unsure on what I should do at this point.

As you can refer above, the 3 "Merge branch __ into __" were not supposed to happen.

Thanks!

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Model files are still present though for some reason. Not sure what that error is I'm afraid. Feedback attempted so will give you the marks, but can't merge until solved.

@JoshuaSYX

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I managed to fix the problem. As per requested by Boyeong and you, I have added the Dice Score Coefficient in the README file as well as removed the model file that would clog up the repository. Please have a look when you are available.

Thank you!

@shakes76
shakes76 merged commit 15666bd into shakes76:topic-recognitionNov 23, 2021
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@JoshuaSYX@wooboyeong@shakes76@nathasha-naranpanawa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset - #296

Merged
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition
Nov 23, 2021
Merged

Image Segmentation ISIC Melanoma Dataset#296
shakes76 merged 23 commits into
shakes76:topic-recognitionfrom
JoshuaSYX:topic-recognition

Conversation

@JoshuaSYX

@JoshuaSYXJoshuaSYX commented Nov 1, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi Shakes,

Please review this pull request. My chosen task was Image Segmentation using ISIC Melanoma Dataset using an Improved UNET Model. The number of epochs used was 30, and an average dice coefficient score obtained is 0.94. A description for the attached files are included.

  • README.md: Contains useful information about the project
  • driver.py: Contains the preprocessing functions, training loop and dice coefficient score calculation
  • model.py: Contains the architecture of the model

Thank you!
Joshua Yu Xuan Soo
S4571796

@wooboyeong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

README

  • Please report average DSC for test set in README

General Comments

  • Code OK for EASY
  • Commit messages OK
  • Pull request OK

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

TF/Torch Usage

Adequate use and implementation

Good Practice (Design/Commenting)

Good spacing and comments
Header blocks

Algorithm

Driver Script present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage
Module present
No Data leakage
Difficulty: Easy -10

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages
Progressive commits used

Documentation

Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
Please remove model files, these will clog up the repository. Your pull request will not be merged until they are removed. Feedback marks will be awarded when these are removed. -2
Request Description OK

@JoshuaSYX

JoshuaSYX commented Nov 22, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I think I ran into a slight error, I posted it on Edstem but I will copy it here as well.

I was attempting to fix my project as per the required feedback, but I believed I accidentally pressed on "Fetch Upstream", and my repository on Github was updated but my local repository is not. I only noticed this afterwards and I am now unable to perform any git operations since the 2 repositories are different.

Is there any advice on how to fix this? Or if possible can I make an entirely new submission because I am unsure on what I should do at this point.

As you can refer above, the 3 "Merge branch __ into __" were not supposed to happen.

Thanks!

@shakes76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Model files are still present though for some reason. Not sure what that error is I'm afraid. Feedback attempted so will give you the marks, but can't merge until solved.

@JoshuaSYX

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi Shakes,

I managed to fix the problem. As per requested by Boyeong and you, I have added the Dice Score Coefficient in the README file as well as removed the model file that would clog up the repository. Please have a look when you are available.

Thank you!

@shakes76
shakes76 merged commit 15666bd into shakes76:topic-recognitionNov 23, 2021
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@JoshuaSYX@wooboyeong@shakes76@nathasha-naranpanawa