Topic recognition

[jbart178]

pull request for Jackson Barton 45819061. No images in readme for outputs of model as model is still training will provide when they come out

[SiyuLiu0329]

This is an initial inspection, no action is required at this point

• commit messages: some could be more detailed e.g. "something changed"
• reconstruction: code seem OK, but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• image gen: code seem OK, , but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• readme: seems incomplete
• code commenting: needs more work
• no need to commit utils.py if its empty

[shakes76]

Good Practice (Design/Commenting, TF/Torch Usage)

Adequate use and implementation (training evidence lacking, unverifiable) -4
Good spacing and comments
Header blocks missing -1

Recognition Problem

Solves problem (can't verify because of lack of logs, generations etc.) -3
Driver Script present
File structure present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage (no plots, no outputs) -2
Module present
Commenting minimal -1
No Data leakage (prediction, testing evidence) -2
Difficulty: Hard

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages, could be more informative -1
Progressive commits used

Documentation

ReadMe minimal, needs model details, PR should be verifiable -2
Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
No Feedback required, but not mergeable, no evidence that it is working correctly.
Request Description minimal, needs more info -2

[jbart178]

pull request for Jackson Barton 45819061. No images in readme for outputs of model as model is still training will provide when they come out

[SiyuLiu0329]

This is an initial inspection, no action is required at this point

• commit messages: some could be more detailed e.g. "something changed"
• reconstruction: code seem OK, but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• image gen: code seem OK, , but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• readme: seems incomplete
• code commenting: needs more work
• no need to commit utils.py if its empty

[shakes76]

Good Practice (Design/Commenting, TF/Torch Usage)

Adequate use and implementation (training evidence lacking, unverifiable) -4
Good spacing and comments
Header blocks missing -1

Recognition Problem

Solves problem (can't verify because of lack of logs, generations etc.) -3
Driver Script present
File structure present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage (no plots, no outputs) -2
Module present
Commenting minimal -1
No Data leakage (prediction, testing evidence) -2
Difficulty: Hard

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages, could be more informative -1
Progressive commits used

Documentation

ReadMe minimal, needs model details, PR should be verifiable -2
Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
No Feedback required, but not mergeable, no evidence that it is working correctly.
Request Description minimal, needs more info -2

[jbart178]

pull request for Jackson Barton 45819061. No images in readme for outputs of model as model is still training will provide when they come out

[SiyuLiu0329]

This is an initial inspection, no action is required at this point

• commit messages: some could be more detailed e.g. "something changed"
• reconstruction: code seem OK, but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• image gen: code seem OK, , but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• readme: seems incomplete
• code commenting: needs more work
• no need to commit utils.py if its empty

[shakes76]

Good Practice (Design/Commenting, TF/Torch Usage)

Adequate use and implementation (training evidence lacking, unverifiable) -4
Good spacing and comments
Header blocks missing -1

Recognition Problem

Solves problem (can't verify because of lack of logs, generations etc.) -3
Driver Script present
File structure present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage (no plots, no outputs) -2
Module present
Commenting minimal -1
No Data leakage (prediction, testing evidence) -2
Difficulty: Hard

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages, could be more informative -1
Progressive commits used

Documentation

ReadMe minimal, needs model details, PR should be verifiable -2
Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
No Feedback required, but not mergeable, no evidence that it is working correctly.
Request Description minimal, needs more info -2

[jbart178]

pull request for Jackson Barton 45819061. No images in readme for outputs of model as model is still training will provide when they come out

[SiyuLiu0329]

This is an initial inspection, no action is required at this point

• commit messages: some could be more detailed e.g. "something changed"
• reconstruction: code seem OK, but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• image gen: code seem OK, , but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• readme: seems incomplete
• code commenting: needs more work
• no need to commit utils.py if its empty

[shakes76]

Good Practice (Design/Commenting, TF/Torch Usage)

Adequate use and implementation (training evidence lacking, unverifiable) -4
Good spacing and comments
Header blocks missing -1

Recognition Problem

Solves problem (can't verify because of lack of logs, generations etc.) -3
Driver Script present
File structure present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage (no plots, no outputs) -2
Module present
Commenting minimal -1
No Data leakage (prediction, testing evidence) -2
Difficulty: Hard

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages, could be more informative -1
Progressive commits used

Documentation

ReadMe minimal, needs model details, PR should be verifiable -2
Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
No Feedback required, but not mergeable, no evidence that it is working correctly.
Request Description minimal, needs more info -2

[jbart178]

pull request for Jackson Barton 45819061. No images in readme for outputs of model as model is still training will provide when they come out

[SiyuLiu0329]

This is an initial inspection, no action is required at this point

• commit messages: some could be more detailed e.g. "something changed"
• reconstruction: code seem OK, but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• image gen: code seem OK, , but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• readme: seems incomplete
• code commenting: needs more work
• no need to commit utils.py if its empty

[shakes76]

Good Practice (Design/Commenting, TF/Torch Usage)

Adequate use and implementation (training evidence lacking, unverifiable) -4
Good spacing and comments
Header blocks missing -1

Recognition Problem

Solves problem (can't verify because of lack of logs, generations etc.) -3
Driver Script present
File structure present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage (no plots, no outputs) -2
Module present
Commenting minimal -1
No Data leakage (prediction, testing evidence) -2
Difficulty: Hard

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages, could be more informative -1
Progressive commits used

Documentation

ReadMe minimal, needs model details, PR should be verifiable -2
Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
No Feedback required, but not mergeable, no evidence that it is working correctly.
Request Description minimal, needs more info -2

[jbart178]

pull request for Jackson Barton 45819061. No images in readme for outputs of model as model is still training will provide when they come out

[SiyuLiu0329]

This is an initial inspection, no action is required at this point

• commit messages: some could be more detailed e.g. "something changed"
• reconstruction: code seem OK, but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• image gen: code seem OK, , but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• readme: seems incomplete
• code commenting: needs more work
• no need to commit utils.py if its empty

[shakes76]

Good Practice (Design/Commenting, TF/Torch Usage)

Adequate use and implementation (training evidence lacking, unverifiable) -4
Good spacing and comments
Header blocks missing -1

Recognition Problem

Solves problem (can't verify because of lack of logs, generations etc.) -3
Driver Script present
File structure present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage (no plots, no outputs) -2
Module present
Commenting minimal -1
No Data leakage (prediction, testing evidence) -2
Difficulty: Hard

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages, could be more informative -1
Progressive commits used

Documentation

ReadMe minimal, needs model details, PR should be verifiable -2
Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
No Feedback required, but not mergeable, no evidence that it is working correctly.
Request Description minimal, needs more info -2

[jbart178]

pull request for Jackson Barton 45819061. No images in readme for outputs of model as model is still training will provide when they come out

[SiyuLiu0329]

This is an initial inspection, no action is required at this point

• commit messages: some could be more detailed e.g. "something changed"
• reconstruction: code seem OK, but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• image gen: code seem OK, , but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• readme: seems incomplete
• code commenting: needs more work
• no need to commit utils.py if its empty

[shakes76]

Good Practice (Design/Commenting, TF/Torch Usage)

Adequate use and implementation (training evidence lacking, unverifiable) -4
Good spacing and comments
Header blocks missing -1

Recognition Problem

Solves problem (can't verify because of lack of logs, generations etc.) -3
Driver Script present
File structure present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage (no plots, no outputs) -2
Module present
Commenting minimal -1
No Data leakage (prediction, testing evidence) -2
Difficulty: Hard

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages, could be more informative -1
Progressive commits used

Documentation

ReadMe minimal, needs model details, PR should be verifiable -2
Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
No Feedback required, but not mergeable, no evidence that it is working correctly.
Request Description minimal, needs more info -2

[jbart178]

pull request for Jackson Barton 45819061. No images in readme for outputs of model as model is still training will provide when they come out

[SiyuLiu0329]

This is an initial inspection, no action is required at this point

• commit messages: some could be more detailed e.g. "something changed"
• reconstruction: code seem OK, but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• image gen: code seem OK, , but no results preview or training logs, i am unable to verify the results
• readme: seems incomplete
• code commenting: needs more work
• no need to commit utils.py if its empty

[shakes76]

Good Practice (Design/Commenting, TF/Torch Usage)

Adequate use and implementation (training evidence lacking, unverifiable) -4
Good spacing and comments
Header blocks missing -1

Recognition Problem

Solves problem (can't verify because of lack of logs, generations etc.) -3
Driver Script present
File structure present
Shows Usage & Demo & Visualisation & Data usage (no plots, no outputs) -2
Module present
Commenting minimal -1
No Data leakage (prediction, testing evidence) -2
Difficulty: Hard

Commit Log

Meaningful commit messages, could be more informative -1
Progressive commits used

Documentation

ReadMe minimal, needs model details, PR should be verifiable -2
Good Description and Comments
Markdown used PDF submitted

Pull Request

Successful Pull Request (Working Algorithm Delivered on Time in Correct Branch)
No Feedback required, but not mergeable, no evidence that it is working correctly.
Request Description minimal, needs more info -2