Align PM skills, schemas, templates, and examples - #7
Merged
Conversation
simaba
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 18, 2026 05:54
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
The second sweep found a concrete contract failure:
pmkitvalidated one contract while the RAID skill and older tests used another;FormatChecker.Changes
schemas/raid-row.schema.jsonas the canonical RAID contractschemas/raid-row.jsonas an identical legacy-path compatibility copy instead of a second modelscore == probability × impactfor risk recordsVerification
The final branch passed CI on Python 3.10, 3.11, and 3.12. Schema validity still confirms only shape and selected cross-field semantics; it does not prove that the underlying PM judgment or evidence is sound.