Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
feat(providers): add Gemini 3.6 Flash and 3.5 Flash-Lite - #5812
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. |
PR SummaryLow Risk Overview
No provider routing or API code changes—new IDs are picked up via existing Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 994d334. Configure here. |
Greptile SummaryThis PR expands the Google model registry with two Gemini Flash models.
Confidence Score: 5/5This looks safe to merge.
Important Files Changed
Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "feat(providers): add Gemini 3.6 Flash an..." | Re-trigger Greptile |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
waleedlatif1
commented
Jul 21, 2026
@greptile the one flagged thread was a false positive — the temperature/thinking support lists are derived at module load from each model entry's |
waleedlatif1
commented
Jul 21, 2026
@cursor review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✅ Bugbot reviewed your changes and found no new issues!
Comment @cursor review or bugbot run to trigger another review on this PR
Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 994d334. Configure here.
waleedlatif1
commented
Jul 21, 2026
Verified both models against the live Gemini API (
Both models return HTTP 200 on |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
gemini-3.6-flashto the Google provider registry (input $1.50/M, cached $0.15/M, output $7.50/M) and set it as the recommended Google flash modelgemini-3.5-flash-lite(input $0.30/M, cached $0.03/M, output $2.50/M), marked speed-optimizedrecommendedfromgemini-3.5-flashtogemini-3.6-flash(direct successor: better performance, 17% fewer output tokens)Type of Change
Testing
Tested manually —
bun run lintpasses; both models fall under thegoogleprovider so they're automatically hosted + billed.Checklist