fix(assistant): get_thread_context calls store.find() for user_message events

[srtaalej]

Summary

Fixes get_thread_context() returning None in user_message handlers when assistant_thread is present in the payload but only contains an action_token (no context).
Closes#1452

Testing

fromslack_boltimportAppfromslack_boltimportAssistant, Sayassistant=Assistant() # default store or custom — same result@assistant.thread_starteddefhandle_thread_started(say, save_thread_context, payload):
thread_context=payload["assistant_thread"]["context"]
save_thread_context(thread_context) say("Hi!")
@assistant.thread_context_changeddefhandle_context_changed(save_thread_context, payload):
new_context=payload["assistant_thread"]["context"]
save_thread_context(new_context) @assistant.user_messagedefhandle_user_message(say, get_thread_context):
ctx=get_thread_context() # should work nowprint(ctx)
app=App(token="xoxb-...", signing_secret="...")
app.use(assistant)

Category

• slack_bolt.App and/or its core components
• slack_bolt.async_app.AsyncApp and/or its core components
• Adapters in slack_bolt.adapter
• Document pages under /docs
• Others

Requirements

Please read the Contributing guidelines and Code of Conduct before creating this issue or pull request. By submitting, you are agreeing to those rules.

• I've read and understood the Contributing Guidelines and have done my best effort to follow them.
• I've read and agree to the Code of Conduct.
• I've run ./scripts/install_all_and_run_tests.sh after making the changes.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.31%. Comparing base (98a8f59) to head (99e38ac).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1453 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.31% 91.31% =======================================
Files 229 229 Lines 7266 7266 =======================================
Hits 6635 6635 Misses 631 631 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[WilliamBergamin]

Look good 💯

Left one comment around testing, what do you think about leaving the current tests unchanged and instead add new tests for this case?

[WilliamBergamin]

What do you think about leaving the old test cases untouched and adding new ones for this logic?

[WilliamBergamin]

Nice fix 🚀 🥇

Left 2 non blocking comment let me know what you think

[rayterrill]

@srtaalej any idea when we can expect a fix for this? 🙏