This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api - #160

Open
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag
Open

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api#160
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag

Conversation

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.

[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535

Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.
[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu <zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com>
@jimlindeman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

So in this change, we are asserting that if the REST param shared=True is present, it should return back a { "networks": [] } result.

@sudorandom , do you think that's the way we should have it return list network results? Or should the 'public' networks should be returned with shared=True and not if shared=False?

@briancline

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems more logical for the public network to show up as a shared network.

Can you explain how Horizon presents the private and public network lists in both cases of (a) the public network only being included when shared=False and (b) the public network only being included when shared=True?

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jimlindeman , currently base on the code [0], I think both public and private network are all non-shared.

[0] https://github.com/softlayer/jumpgate/blob/master/jumpgate/network/drivers/sl/networks.py#L61

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@briancline , frankly I'm not familiar with Horizon code so much, the case what I saw in Horizon UI is it shows private and public both networks in VM provisioning dialog, and in Horizon code, the same logic at https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535 . Without this change, a network will be duplicated.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@zhiyanliu@jimlindeman@briancline
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api - #160

Open
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag
Open

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api#160
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag

Conversation

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.

[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535

Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.
[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu <zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com>
@jimlindeman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

So in this change, we are asserting that if the REST param shared=True is present, it should return back a { "networks": [] } result.

@sudorandom , do you think that's the way we should have it return list network results? Or should the 'public' networks should be returned with shared=True and not if shared=False?

@briancline

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems more logical for the public network to show up as a shared network.

Can you explain how Horizon presents the private and public network lists in both cases of (a) the public network only being included when shared=False and (b) the public network only being included when shared=True?

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jimlindeman , currently base on the code [0], I think both public and private network are all non-shared.

[0] https://github.com/softlayer/jumpgate/blob/master/jumpgate/network/drivers/sl/networks.py#L61

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@briancline , frankly I'm not familiar with Horizon code so much, the case what I saw in Horizon UI is it shows private and public both networks in VM provisioning dialog, and in Horizon code, the same logic at https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535 . Without this change, a network will be duplicated.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@zhiyanliu@jimlindeman@briancline
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api - #160

Open
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag
Open

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api#160
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag

Conversation

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.

[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535

Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.
[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu <zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com>
@jimlindeman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

So in this change, we are asserting that if the REST param shared=True is present, it should return back a { "networks": [] } result.

@sudorandom , do you think that's the way we should have it return list network results? Or should the 'public' networks should be returned with shared=True and not if shared=False?

@briancline

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems more logical for the public network to show up as a shared network.

Can you explain how Horizon presents the private and public network lists in both cases of (a) the public network only being included when shared=False and (b) the public network only being included when shared=True?

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jimlindeman , currently base on the code [0], I think both public and private network are all non-shared.

[0] https://github.com/softlayer/jumpgate/blob/master/jumpgate/network/drivers/sl/networks.py#L61

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@briancline , frankly I'm not familiar with Horizon code so much, the case what I saw in Horizon UI is it shows private and public both networks in VM provisioning dialog, and in Horizon code, the same logic at https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535 . Without this change, a network will be duplicated.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@zhiyanliu@jimlindeman@briancline
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api - #160

Open
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag
Open

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api#160
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag

Conversation

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.

[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535

Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.
[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu <zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com>
@jimlindeman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

So in this change, we are asserting that if the REST param shared=True is present, it should return back a { "networks": [] } result.

@sudorandom , do you think that's the way we should have it return list network results? Or should the 'public' networks should be returned with shared=True and not if shared=False?

@briancline

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems more logical for the public network to show up as a shared network.

Can you explain how Horizon presents the private and public network lists in both cases of (a) the public network only being included when shared=False and (b) the public network only being included when shared=True?

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jimlindeman , currently base on the code [0], I think both public and private network are all non-shared.

[0] https://github.com/softlayer/jumpgate/blob/master/jumpgate/network/drivers/sl/networks.py#L61

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@briancline , frankly I'm not familiar with Horizon code so much, the case what I saw in Horizon UI is it shows private and public both networks in VM provisioning dialog, and in Horizon code, the same logic at https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535 . Without this change, a network will be duplicated.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@zhiyanliu@jimlindeman@briancline
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api - #160

Open
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag
Open

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api#160
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag

Conversation

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.

[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535

Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.
[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu <zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com>
@jimlindeman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

So in this change, we are asserting that if the REST param shared=True is present, it should return back a { "networks": [] } result.

@sudorandom , do you think that's the way we should have it return list network results? Or should the 'public' networks should be returned with shared=True and not if shared=False?

@briancline

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems more logical for the public network to show up as a shared network.

Can you explain how Horizon presents the private and public network lists in both cases of (a) the public network only being included when shared=False and (b) the public network only being included when shared=True?

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jimlindeman , currently base on the code [0], I think both public and private network are all non-shared.

[0] https://github.com/softlayer/jumpgate/blob/master/jumpgate/network/drivers/sl/networks.py#L61

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@briancline , frankly I'm not familiar with Horizon code so much, the case what I saw in Horizon UI is it shows private and public both networks in VM provisioning dialog, and in Horizon code, the same logic at https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535 . Without this change, a network will be duplicated.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@zhiyanliu@jimlindeman@briancline
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api - #160

Open
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag
Open

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api#160
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag

Conversation

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.

[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535

Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.
[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu <zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com>
@jimlindeman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

So in this change, we are asserting that if the REST param shared=True is present, it should return back a { "networks": [] } result.

@sudorandom , do you think that's the way we should have it return list network results? Or should the 'public' networks should be returned with shared=True and not if shared=False?

@briancline

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems more logical for the public network to show up as a shared network.

Can you explain how Horizon presents the private and public network lists in both cases of (a) the public network only being included when shared=False and (b) the public network only being included when shared=True?

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jimlindeman , currently base on the code [0], I think both public and private network are all non-shared.

[0] https://github.com/softlayer/jumpgate/blob/master/jumpgate/network/drivers/sl/networks.py#L61

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@briancline , frankly I'm not familiar with Horizon code so much, the case what I saw in Horizon UI is it shows private and public both networks in VM provisioning dialog, and in Horizon code, the same logic at https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535 . Without this change, a network will be duplicated.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@zhiyanliu@jimlindeman@briancline
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api - #160

Open
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag
Open

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api#160
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag

Conversation

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.

[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535

Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.
[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu <zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com>
@jimlindeman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

So in this change, we are asserting that if the REST param shared=True is present, it should return back a { "networks": [] } result.

@sudorandom , do you think that's the way we should have it return list network results? Or should the 'public' networks should be returned with shared=True and not if shared=False?

@briancline

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems more logical for the public network to show up as a shared network.

Can you explain how Horizon presents the private and public network lists in both cases of (a) the public network only being included when shared=False and (b) the public network only being included when shared=True?

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jimlindeman , currently base on the code [0], I think both public and private network are all non-shared.

[0] https://github.com/softlayer/jumpgate/blob/master/jumpgate/network/drivers/sl/networks.py#L61

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@briancline , frankly I'm not familiar with Horizon code so much, the case what I saw in Horizon UI is it shows private and public both networks in VM provisioning dialog, and in Horizon code, the same logic at https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535 . Without this change, a network will be duplicated.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@zhiyanliu@jimlindeman@briancline
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api - #160

Open
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag
Open

Adding shared flag support to network v2 list api#160
zhiyanliu wants to merge 1 commit into
softlayer:masterfrom
zhiyanliu:network-list-support-shared-flag

Conversation

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.

[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535

Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com

As spec defined [0], jumpgate should care about shared flag for network
v2 list api. And currently horizon use this flag to obtain shared and
non-shared network by two separted calls and orignize network list in
GUI [1], so without this fix horizon will get wrong as well.
[0] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yan Liu <zhiyanl@cn.ibm.com>
@jimlindeman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

So in this change, we are asserting that if the REST param shared=True is present, it should return back a { "networks": [] } result.

@sudorandom , do you think that's the way we should have it return list network results? Or should the 'public' networks should be returned with shared=True and not if shared=False?

@briancline

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It seems more logical for the public network to show up as a shared network.

Can you explain how Horizon presents the private and public network lists in both cases of (a) the public network only being included when shared=False and (b) the public network only being included when shared=True?

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jimlindeman , currently base on the code [0], I think both public and private network are all non-shared.

[0] https://github.com/softlayer/jumpgate/blob/master/jumpgate/network/drivers/sl/networks.py#L61

@zhiyanliu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@briancline , frankly I'm not familiar with Horizon code so much, the case what I saw in Horizon UI is it shows private and public both networks in VM provisioning dialog, and in Horizon code, the same logic at https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/api/neutron.py#L535 . Without this change, a network will be duplicated.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@zhiyanliu@jimlindeman@briancline