Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
сhore: upgrade dart sdk - #349
Conversation
… for incomplete function definitions
…rom argument expressions instead of arguments directly
…g and defaultClause check
…ad of NamedExpression check
…update node utility helpers
… method declarations instead of abstract ones
…ing field formal parameters
…ion visitor and reformat code style
… field assignment in SolidDiagnosticMessage
…for named arguments and file system access
…alyzer_plugin dependency
Warning Review limit reachedNext included review available in 43 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (34)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe package now requires Dart 3.12, uses newer analyzer tooling, removes the ChangesAnalyzer migration and lint updates
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~25 minutes Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to This SDK upgrade has no actionable merge-blocking risk in the supplied evidence and is merge-ready after normal checks and review. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (32 skipped: 32 unsupported.) ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
…ers in record literals
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Maintenance