[FR] Add timeframe/temporal query parameters to MCP tools for trend analysis #511

Description

@waynesun09

Problem Statement

Currently, Sourcebot's MCP tools (search_code, list_repos, get_file_source) only provide access to the current state of the codebase. This limitation prevents AI language models from performing meaningful temporal analysis, trend reporting, or historical insights when using the Sourcebot MCP server.

Use Case

When LLMs attempt to analyze code evolution, track changes over time, or provide trend analysis, they are unable to do so effectively because the MCP tools lack timeframe filtering capabilities. This results in responses like "I cannot analyze trends over time with the available tools" or incomplete analysis based only on current code state.

Real-World Examples:

  • Trend Analysis: "Show me how the usage of async/await has evolved in our codebase over the last year"
  • Historical Search: "Find all instances where deprecated function X was removed between March and June"
  • Evolution Tracking: "Compare the error handling patterns used 6 months ago vs today"
  • Regression Analysis: "Identify when specific security patterns were introduced across repositories"

Proposed Solution

Add temporal/timeframe parameters to existing MCP tools to enable time-based querying:

Enhanced search_code Tool

Add optional parameters:

{since?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-01-01")
until?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-12-31")
dateRange?: string;// Relative range (e.g., "last-3-months", "last-year")
gitRevision?: string;// Specific commit/tag/branch
compareRevisions?: {// Compare between two points in time
from: string;
to: string;};
includeDeletedFiles?: boolean;// Include files that were deleted in timeframe}

Enhanced list_repos Tool

Add repository filtering by activity timeframe:

{activeAfter?: string;// Only repos with commits after this date
activeBefore?: string;// Only repos with commits before this date}

New search_commits Tool

{
query: string;// Search in commit messages, authors, changes
since?: string;
until?: string;
author?: string;
repository?: string[];}

Technical Implementation Considerations

  1. Git Integration: Leverage git log with --since, --until, --author flags
  2. Zoekt Enhancement: Extend Zoekt indexing to include commit metadata and timestamps
  3. API Compatibility: Maintain backward compatibility by making all new parameters optional
  4. Performance: Consider caching mechanisms for frequently requested time ranges
  5. Date Formats: Support both absolute (ISO 8601) and relative dates ("1 week ago", "last month")

Benefits

  • Enhanced AI Analysis: Enable LLMs to provide comprehensive temporal insights and trend analysis
  • Historical Context: Allow developers to understand code evolution and decision history
  • Compliance & Auditing: Support regulatory requirements for tracking code changes over time
  • Research Capabilities: Enable academic and organizational research on codebase evolution
  • Debugging: Help identify when bugs or issues were introduced

Related Issues

This request complements issue #22 "FR: Ability to query for configuration in repositories over time" but focuses specifically on enhancing the MCP interface for broader temporal querying capabilities.

Community Impact

This feature would make Sourcebot's MCP integration significantly more powerful for AI-assisted development workflows, positioning it as a leader in temporal code analysis capabilities. Many organizations need this functionality for compliance, research, and advanced AI-powered insights.

Alternative Approaches Considered

  1. Client-side Git Integration: Less efficient and requires additional tooling
  2. Separate Temporal API: Would fragment the interface and require additional complexity
  3. External Time-series Database: Overkill for this use case and adds infrastructure complexity

The proposed approach of enhancing existing MCP tools provides the most seamless integration with current workflows while enabling powerful new capabilities.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    [FR] Add timeframe/temporal query parameters to MCP tools for trend analysis #511

    Description

    @waynesun09

    Problem Statement

    Currently, Sourcebot's MCP tools (search_code, list_repos, get_file_source) only provide access to the current state of the codebase. This limitation prevents AI language models from performing meaningful temporal analysis, trend reporting, or historical insights when using the Sourcebot MCP server.

    Use Case

    When LLMs attempt to analyze code evolution, track changes over time, or provide trend analysis, they are unable to do so effectively because the MCP tools lack timeframe filtering capabilities. This results in responses like "I cannot analyze trends over time with the available tools" or incomplete analysis based only on current code state.

    Real-World Examples:

    • Trend Analysis: "Show me how the usage of async/await has evolved in our codebase over the last year"
    • Historical Search: "Find all instances where deprecated function X was removed between March and June"
    • Evolution Tracking: "Compare the error handling patterns used 6 months ago vs today"
    • Regression Analysis: "Identify when specific security patterns were introduced across repositories"

    Proposed Solution

    Add temporal/timeframe parameters to existing MCP tools to enable time-based querying:

    Enhanced search_code Tool

    Add optional parameters:

    {since?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-01-01")
    until?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-12-31")
    dateRange?: string;// Relative range (e.g., "last-3-months", "last-year")
    gitRevision?: string;// Specific commit/tag/branch
    compareRevisions?: {// Compare between two points in time
    from: string;
    to: string;};
    includeDeletedFiles?: boolean;// Include files that were deleted in timeframe}

    Enhanced list_repos Tool

    Add repository filtering by activity timeframe:

    {activeAfter?: string;// Only repos with commits after this date
    activeBefore?: string;// Only repos with commits before this date}

    New search_commits Tool

    {
    query: string;// Search in commit messages, authors, changes
    since?: string;
    until?: string;
    author?: string;
    repository?: string[];}

    Technical Implementation Considerations

    1. Git Integration: Leverage git log with --since, --until, --author flags
    2. Zoekt Enhancement: Extend Zoekt indexing to include commit metadata and timestamps
    3. API Compatibility: Maintain backward compatibility by making all new parameters optional
    4. Performance: Consider caching mechanisms for frequently requested time ranges
    5. Date Formats: Support both absolute (ISO 8601) and relative dates ("1 week ago", "last month")

    Benefits

    • Enhanced AI Analysis: Enable LLMs to provide comprehensive temporal insights and trend analysis
    • Historical Context: Allow developers to understand code evolution and decision history
    • Compliance & Auditing: Support regulatory requirements for tracking code changes over time
    • Research Capabilities: Enable academic and organizational research on codebase evolution
    • Debugging: Help identify when bugs or issues were introduced

    Related Issues

    This request complements issue #22 "FR: Ability to query for configuration in repositories over time" but focuses specifically on enhancing the MCP interface for broader temporal querying capabilities.

    Community Impact

    This feature would make Sourcebot's MCP integration significantly more powerful for AI-assisted development workflows, positioning it as a leader in temporal code analysis capabilities. Many organizations need this functionality for compliance, research, and advanced AI-powered insights.

    Alternative Approaches Considered

    1. Client-side Git Integration: Less efficient and requires additional tooling
    2. Separate Temporal API: Would fragment the interface and require additional complexity
    3. External Time-series Database: Overkill for this use case and adds infrastructure complexity

    The proposed approach of enhancing existing MCP tools provides the most seamless integration with current workflows while enabling powerful new capabilities.

    Activity

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      [FR] Add timeframe/temporal query parameters to MCP tools for trend analysis #511

      Description

      @waynesun09

      Problem Statement

      Currently, Sourcebot's MCP tools (search_code, list_repos, get_file_source) only provide access to the current state of the codebase. This limitation prevents AI language models from performing meaningful temporal analysis, trend reporting, or historical insights when using the Sourcebot MCP server.

      Use Case

      When LLMs attempt to analyze code evolution, track changes over time, or provide trend analysis, they are unable to do so effectively because the MCP tools lack timeframe filtering capabilities. This results in responses like "I cannot analyze trends over time with the available tools" or incomplete analysis based only on current code state.

      Real-World Examples:

      • Trend Analysis: "Show me how the usage of async/await has evolved in our codebase over the last year"
      • Historical Search: "Find all instances where deprecated function X was removed between March and June"
      • Evolution Tracking: "Compare the error handling patterns used 6 months ago vs today"
      • Regression Analysis: "Identify when specific security patterns were introduced across repositories"

      Proposed Solution

      Add temporal/timeframe parameters to existing MCP tools to enable time-based querying:

      Enhanced search_code Tool

      Add optional parameters:

      {since?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-01-01")
      until?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-12-31")
      dateRange?: string;// Relative range (e.g., "last-3-months", "last-year")
      gitRevision?: string;// Specific commit/tag/branch
      compareRevisions?: {// Compare between two points in time
      from: string;
      to: string;};
      includeDeletedFiles?: boolean;// Include files that were deleted in timeframe}

      Enhanced list_repos Tool

      Add repository filtering by activity timeframe:

      {activeAfter?: string;// Only repos with commits after this date
      activeBefore?: string;// Only repos with commits before this date}

      New search_commits Tool

      {
      query: string;// Search in commit messages, authors, changes
      since?: string;
      until?: string;
      author?: string;
      repository?: string[];}

      Technical Implementation Considerations

      1. Git Integration: Leverage git log with --since, --until, --author flags
      2. Zoekt Enhancement: Extend Zoekt indexing to include commit metadata and timestamps
      3. API Compatibility: Maintain backward compatibility by making all new parameters optional
      4. Performance: Consider caching mechanisms for frequently requested time ranges
      5. Date Formats: Support both absolute (ISO 8601) and relative dates ("1 week ago", "last month")

      Benefits

      • Enhanced AI Analysis: Enable LLMs to provide comprehensive temporal insights and trend analysis
      • Historical Context: Allow developers to understand code evolution and decision history
      • Compliance & Auditing: Support regulatory requirements for tracking code changes over time
      • Research Capabilities: Enable academic and organizational research on codebase evolution
      • Debugging: Help identify when bugs or issues were introduced

      Related Issues

      This request complements issue #22 "FR: Ability to query for configuration in repositories over time" but focuses specifically on enhancing the MCP interface for broader temporal querying capabilities.

      Community Impact

      This feature would make Sourcebot's MCP integration significantly more powerful for AI-assisted development workflows, positioning it as a leader in temporal code analysis capabilities. Many organizations need this functionality for compliance, research, and advanced AI-powered insights.

      Alternative Approaches Considered

      1. Client-side Git Integration: Less efficient and requires additional tooling
      2. Separate Temporal API: Would fragment the interface and require additional complexity
      3. External Time-series Database: Overkill for this use case and adds infrastructure complexity

      The proposed approach of enhancing existing MCP tools provides the most seamless integration with current workflows while enabling powerful new capabilities.

      Activity

      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Labels

      No labels
      No labels

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        [FR] Add timeframe/temporal query parameters to MCP tools for trend analysis #511

        Description

        @waynesun09

        Problem Statement

        Currently, Sourcebot's MCP tools (search_code, list_repos, get_file_source) only provide access to the current state of the codebase. This limitation prevents AI language models from performing meaningful temporal analysis, trend reporting, or historical insights when using the Sourcebot MCP server.

        Use Case

        When LLMs attempt to analyze code evolution, track changes over time, or provide trend analysis, they are unable to do so effectively because the MCP tools lack timeframe filtering capabilities. This results in responses like "I cannot analyze trends over time with the available tools" or incomplete analysis based only on current code state.

        Real-World Examples:

        • Trend Analysis: "Show me how the usage of async/await has evolved in our codebase over the last year"
        • Historical Search: "Find all instances where deprecated function X was removed between March and June"
        • Evolution Tracking: "Compare the error handling patterns used 6 months ago vs today"
        • Regression Analysis: "Identify when specific security patterns were introduced across repositories"

        Proposed Solution

        Add temporal/timeframe parameters to existing MCP tools to enable time-based querying:

        Enhanced search_code Tool

        Add optional parameters:

        {since?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-01-01")
        until?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-12-31")
        dateRange?: string;// Relative range (e.g., "last-3-months", "last-year")
        gitRevision?: string;// Specific commit/tag/branch
        compareRevisions?: {// Compare between two points in time
        from: string;
        to: string;};
        includeDeletedFiles?: boolean;// Include files that were deleted in timeframe}

        Enhanced list_repos Tool

        Add repository filtering by activity timeframe:

        {activeAfter?: string;// Only repos with commits after this date
        activeBefore?: string;// Only repos with commits before this date}

        New search_commits Tool

        {
        query: string;// Search in commit messages, authors, changes
        since?: string;
        until?: string;
        author?: string;
        repository?: string[];}

        Technical Implementation Considerations

        1. Git Integration: Leverage git log with --since, --until, --author flags
        2. Zoekt Enhancement: Extend Zoekt indexing to include commit metadata and timestamps
        3. API Compatibility: Maintain backward compatibility by making all new parameters optional
        4. Performance: Consider caching mechanisms for frequently requested time ranges
        5. Date Formats: Support both absolute (ISO 8601) and relative dates ("1 week ago", "last month")

        Benefits

        • Enhanced AI Analysis: Enable LLMs to provide comprehensive temporal insights and trend analysis
        • Historical Context: Allow developers to understand code evolution and decision history
        • Compliance & Auditing: Support regulatory requirements for tracking code changes over time
        • Research Capabilities: Enable academic and organizational research on codebase evolution
        • Debugging: Help identify when bugs or issues were introduced

        Related Issues

        This request complements issue #22 "FR: Ability to query for configuration in repositories over time" but focuses specifically on enhancing the MCP interface for broader temporal querying capabilities.

        Community Impact

        This feature would make Sourcebot's MCP integration significantly more powerful for AI-assisted development workflows, positioning it as a leader in temporal code analysis capabilities. Many organizations need this functionality for compliance, research, and advanced AI-powered insights.

        Alternative Approaches Considered

        1. Client-side Git Integration: Less efficient and requires additional tooling
        2. Separate Temporal API: Would fragment the interface and require additional complexity
        3. External Time-series Database: Overkill for this use case and adds infrastructure complexity

        The proposed approach of enhancing existing MCP tools provides the most seamless integration with current workflows while enabling powerful new capabilities.

        Activity

        Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          [FR] Add timeframe/temporal query parameters to MCP tools for trend analysis #511

          Description

          @waynesun09

          Problem Statement

          Currently, Sourcebot's MCP tools (search_code, list_repos, get_file_source) only provide access to the current state of the codebase. This limitation prevents AI language models from performing meaningful temporal analysis, trend reporting, or historical insights when using the Sourcebot MCP server.

          Use Case

          When LLMs attempt to analyze code evolution, track changes over time, or provide trend analysis, they are unable to do so effectively because the MCP tools lack timeframe filtering capabilities. This results in responses like "I cannot analyze trends over time with the available tools" or incomplete analysis based only on current code state.

          Real-World Examples:

          • Trend Analysis: "Show me how the usage of async/await has evolved in our codebase over the last year"
          • Historical Search: "Find all instances where deprecated function X was removed between March and June"
          • Evolution Tracking: "Compare the error handling patterns used 6 months ago vs today"
          • Regression Analysis: "Identify when specific security patterns were introduced across repositories"

          Proposed Solution

          Add temporal/timeframe parameters to existing MCP tools to enable time-based querying:

          Enhanced search_code Tool

          Add optional parameters:

          {since?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-01-01")
          until?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-12-31")
          dateRange?: string;// Relative range (e.g., "last-3-months", "last-year")
          gitRevision?: string;// Specific commit/tag/branch
          compareRevisions?: {// Compare between two points in time
          from: string;
          to: string;};
          includeDeletedFiles?: boolean;// Include files that were deleted in timeframe}

          Enhanced list_repos Tool

          Add repository filtering by activity timeframe:

          {activeAfter?: string;// Only repos with commits after this date
          activeBefore?: string;// Only repos with commits before this date}

          New search_commits Tool

          {
          query: string;// Search in commit messages, authors, changes
          since?: string;
          until?: string;
          author?: string;
          repository?: string[];}

          Technical Implementation Considerations

          1. Git Integration: Leverage git log with --since, --until, --author flags
          2. Zoekt Enhancement: Extend Zoekt indexing to include commit metadata and timestamps
          3. API Compatibility: Maintain backward compatibility by making all new parameters optional
          4. Performance: Consider caching mechanisms for frequently requested time ranges
          5. Date Formats: Support both absolute (ISO 8601) and relative dates ("1 week ago", "last month")

          Benefits

          • Enhanced AI Analysis: Enable LLMs to provide comprehensive temporal insights and trend analysis
          • Historical Context: Allow developers to understand code evolution and decision history
          • Compliance & Auditing: Support regulatory requirements for tracking code changes over time
          • Research Capabilities: Enable academic and organizational research on codebase evolution
          • Debugging: Help identify when bugs or issues were introduced

          Related Issues

          This request complements issue #22 "FR: Ability to query for configuration in repositories over time" but focuses specifically on enhancing the MCP interface for broader temporal querying capabilities.

          Community Impact

          This feature would make Sourcebot's MCP integration significantly more powerful for AI-assisted development workflows, positioning it as a leader in temporal code analysis capabilities. Many organizations need this functionality for compliance, research, and advanced AI-powered insights.

          Alternative Approaches Considered

          1. Client-side Git Integration: Less efficient and requires additional tooling
          2. Separate Temporal API: Would fragment the interface and require additional complexity
          3. External Time-series Database: Overkill for this use case and adds infrastructure complexity

          The proposed approach of enhancing existing MCP tools provides the most seamless integration with current workflows while enabling powerful new capabilities.

          Activity

          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Labels

          No labels
          No labels

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            [FR] Add timeframe/temporal query parameters to MCP tools for trend analysis #511

            Description

            @waynesun09

            Problem Statement

            Currently, Sourcebot's MCP tools (search_code, list_repos, get_file_source) only provide access to the current state of the codebase. This limitation prevents AI language models from performing meaningful temporal analysis, trend reporting, or historical insights when using the Sourcebot MCP server.

            Use Case

            When LLMs attempt to analyze code evolution, track changes over time, or provide trend analysis, they are unable to do so effectively because the MCP tools lack timeframe filtering capabilities. This results in responses like "I cannot analyze trends over time with the available tools" or incomplete analysis based only on current code state.

            Real-World Examples:

            • Trend Analysis: "Show me how the usage of async/await has evolved in our codebase over the last year"
            • Historical Search: "Find all instances where deprecated function X was removed between March and June"
            • Evolution Tracking: "Compare the error handling patterns used 6 months ago vs today"
            • Regression Analysis: "Identify when specific security patterns were introduced across repositories"

            Proposed Solution

            Add temporal/timeframe parameters to existing MCP tools to enable time-based querying:

            Enhanced search_code Tool

            Add optional parameters:

            {since?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-01-01")
            until?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-12-31")
            dateRange?: string;// Relative range (e.g., "last-3-months", "last-year")
            gitRevision?: string;// Specific commit/tag/branch
            compareRevisions?: {// Compare between two points in time
            from: string;
            to: string;};
            includeDeletedFiles?: boolean;// Include files that were deleted in timeframe}

            Enhanced list_repos Tool

            Add repository filtering by activity timeframe:

            {activeAfter?: string;// Only repos with commits after this date
            activeBefore?: string;// Only repos with commits before this date}

            New search_commits Tool

            {
            query: string;// Search in commit messages, authors, changes
            since?: string;
            until?: string;
            author?: string;
            repository?: string[];}

            Technical Implementation Considerations

            1. Git Integration: Leverage git log with --since, --until, --author flags
            2. Zoekt Enhancement: Extend Zoekt indexing to include commit metadata and timestamps
            3. API Compatibility: Maintain backward compatibility by making all new parameters optional
            4. Performance: Consider caching mechanisms for frequently requested time ranges
            5. Date Formats: Support both absolute (ISO 8601) and relative dates ("1 week ago", "last month")

            Benefits

            • Enhanced AI Analysis: Enable LLMs to provide comprehensive temporal insights and trend analysis
            • Historical Context: Allow developers to understand code evolution and decision history
            • Compliance & Auditing: Support regulatory requirements for tracking code changes over time
            • Research Capabilities: Enable academic and organizational research on codebase evolution
            • Debugging: Help identify when bugs or issues were introduced

            Related Issues

            This request complements issue #22 "FR: Ability to query for configuration in repositories over time" but focuses specifically on enhancing the MCP interface for broader temporal querying capabilities.

            Community Impact

            This feature would make Sourcebot's MCP integration significantly more powerful for AI-assisted development workflows, positioning it as a leader in temporal code analysis capabilities. Many organizations need this functionality for compliance, research, and advanced AI-powered insights.

            Alternative Approaches Considered

            1. Client-side Git Integration: Less efficient and requires additional tooling
            2. Separate Temporal API: Would fragment the interface and require additional complexity
            3. External Time-series Database: Overkill for this use case and adds infrastructure complexity

            The proposed approach of enhancing existing MCP tools provides the most seamless integration with current workflows while enabling powerful new capabilities.

            Activity

            Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              [FR] Add timeframe/temporal query parameters to MCP tools for trend analysis #511

              Description

              @waynesun09

              Problem Statement

              Currently, Sourcebot's MCP tools (search_code, list_repos, get_file_source) only provide access to the current state of the codebase. This limitation prevents AI language models from performing meaningful temporal analysis, trend reporting, or historical insights when using the Sourcebot MCP server.

              Use Case

              When LLMs attempt to analyze code evolution, track changes over time, or provide trend analysis, they are unable to do so effectively because the MCP tools lack timeframe filtering capabilities. This results in responses like "I cannot analyze trends over time with the available tools" or incomplete analysis based only on current code state.

              Real-World Examples:

              • Trend Analysis: "Show me how the usage of async/await has evolved in our codebase over the last year"
              • Historical Search: "Find all instances where deprecated function X was removed between March and June"
              • Evolution Tracking: "Compare the error handling patterns used 6 months ago vs today"
              • Regression Analysis: "Identify when specific security patterns were introduced across repositories"

              Proposed Solution

              Add temporal/timeframe parameters to existing MCP tools to enable time-based querying:

              Enhanced search_code Tool

              Add optional parameters:

              {since?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-01-01")
              until?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-12-31")
              dateRange?: string;// Relative range (e.g., "last-3-months", "last-year")
              gitRevision?: string;// Specific commit/tag/branch
              compareRevisions?: {// Compare between two points in time
              from: string;
              to: string;};
              includeDeletedFiles?: boolean;// Include files that were deleted in timeframe}

              Enhanced list_repos Tool

              Add repository filtering by activity timeframe:

              {activeAfter?: string;// Only repos with commits after this date
              activeBefore?: string;// Only repos with commits before this date}

              New search_commits Tool

              {
              query: string;// Search in commit messages, authors, changes
              since?: string;
              until?: string;
              author?: string;
              repository?: string[];}

              Technical Implementation Considerations

              1. Git Integration: Leverage git log with --since, --until, --author flags
              2. Zoekt Enhancement: Extend Zoekt indexing to include commit metadata and timestamps
              3. API Compatibility: Maintain backward compatibility by making all new parameters optional
              4. Performance: Consider caching mechanisms for frequently requested time ranges
              5. Date Formats: Support both absolute (ISO 8601) and relative dates ("1 week ago", "last month")

              Benefits

              • Enhanced AI Analysis: Enable LLMs to provide comprehensive temporal insights and trend analysis
              • Historical Context: Allow developers to understand code evolution and decision history
              • Compliance & Auditing: Support regulatory requirements for tracking code changes over time
              • Research Capabilities: Enable academic and organizational research on codebase evolution
              • Debugging: Help identify when bugs or issues were introduced

              Related Issues

              This request complements issue #22 "FR: Ability to query for configuration in repositories over time" but focuses specifically on enhancing the MCP interface for broader temporal querying capabilities.

              Community Impact

              This feature would make Sourcebot's MCP integration significantly more powerful for AI-assisted development workflows, positioning it as a leader in temporal code analysis capabilities. Many organizations need this functionality for compliance, research, and advanced AI-powered insights.

              Alternative Approaches Considered

              1. Client-side Git Integration: Less efficient and requires additional tooling
              2. Separate Temporal API: Would fragment the interface and require additional complexity
              3. External Time-series Database: Overkill for this use case and adds infrastructure complexity

              The proposed approach of enhancing existing MCP tools provides the most seamless integration with current workflows while enabling powerful new capabilities.

              Activity

              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Labels

              No labels
              No labels

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                [FR] Add timeframe/temporal query parameters to MCP tools for trend analysis #511

                Description

                @waynesun09

                Problem Statement

                Currently, Sourcebot's MCP tools (search_code, list_repos, get_file_source) only provide access to the current state of the codebase. This limitation prevents AI language models from performing meaningful temporal analysis, trend reporting, or historical insights when using the Sourcebot MCP server.

                Use Case

                When LLMs attempt to analyze code evolution, track changes over time, or provide trend analysis, they are unable to do so effectively because the MCP tools lack timeframe filtering capabilities. This results in responses like "I cannot analyze trends over time with the available tools" or incomplete analysis based only on current code state.

                Real-World Examples:

                • Trend Analysis: "Show me how the usage of async/await has evolved in our codebase over the last year"
                • Historical Search: "Find all instances where deprecated function X was removed between March and June"
                • Evolution Tracking: "Compare the error handling patterns used 6 months ago vs today"
                • Regression Analysis: "Identify when specific security patterns were introduced across repositories"

                Proposed Solution

                Add temporal/timeframe parameters to existing MCP tools to enable time-based querying:

                Enhanced search_code Tool

                Add optional parameters:

                {since?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-01-01")
                until?: string;// ISO date string (e.g., "2024-12-31")
                dateRange?: string;// Relative range (e.g., "last-3-months", "last-year")
                gitRevision?: string;// Specific commit/tag/branch
                compareRevisions?: {// Compare between two points in time
                from: string;
                to: string;};
                includeDeletedFiles?: boolean;// Include files that were deleted in timeframe}

                Enhanced list_repos Tool

                Add repository filtering by activity timeframe:

                {activeAfter?: string;// Only repos with commits after this date
                activeBefore?: string;// Only repos with commits before this date}

                New search_commits Tool

                {
                query: string;// Search in commit messages, authors, changes
                since?: string;
                until?: string;
                author?: string;
                repository?: string[];}

                Technical Implementation Considerations

                1. Git Integration: Leverage git log with --since, --until, --author flags
                2. Zoekt Enhancement: Extend Zoekt indexing to include commit metadata and timestamps
                3. API Compatibility: Maintain backward compatibility by making all new parameters optional
                4. Performance: Consider caching mechanisms for frequently requested time ranges
                5. Date Formats: Support both absolute (ISO 8601) and relative dates ("1 week ago", "last month")

                Benefits

                • Enhanced AI Analysis: Enable LLMs to provide comprehensive temporal insights and trend analysis
                • Historical Context: Allow developers to understand code evolution and decision history
                • Compliance & Auditing: Support regulatory requirements for tracking code changes over time
                • Research Capabilities: Enable academic and organizational research on codebase evolution
                • Debugging: Help identify when bugs or issues were introduced

                Related Issues

                This request complements issue #22 "FR: Ability to query for configuration in repositories over time" but focuses specifically on enhancing the MCP interface for broader temporal querying capabilities.

                Community Impact

                This feature would make Sourcebot's MCP integration significantly more powerful for AI-assisted development workflows, positioning it as a leader in temporal code analysis capabilities. Many organizations need this functionality for compliance, research, and advanced AI-powered insights.

                Alternative Approaches Considered

                1. Client-side Git Integration: Less efficient and requires additional tooling
                2. Separate Temporal API: Would fragment the interface and require additional complexity
                3. External Time-series Database: Overkill for this use case and adds infrastructure complexity

                The proposed approach of enhancing existing MCP tools provides the most seamless integration with current workflows while enabling powerful new capabilities.

                Activity

                Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions