Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
[SDKS-7564] Flag sets integration tests#763
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ | ||
| import { SplitFactory } from '../..'; | ||
| import splitChange2 from '../mocks/splitchanges.since.-1.till.1602796638344.json'; | ||
| import splitChange1 from '../mocks/splitchanges.since.1602796638344.till.1602797638344.json'; | ||
| import splitChange0 from '../mocks/splitchanges.since.1602797638344.till.1602798638344.json'; | ||
| const baseUrls = { sdk: 'https://sdk.baseurl' }; | ||
| const baseConfig = { | ||
| core: { | ||
| authorizationKey: '<fake-token>', | ||
| key: 'nicolas@split.io' | ||
| }, | ||
| urls: baseUrls, | ||
| scheduler: { featuresRefreshRate: 0.01 }, | ||
| streamingEnabled: false | ||
| }; | ||
| export default function flagSets(fetchMock, t) { | ||
| fetchMock.get(baseUrls.sdk + '/mySegments/nicolas%40split.io', { status: 200, body: { 'mySegments': [] } }); | ||
| t.test(async (assert) => { | ||
| let factory; | ||
| let manager; | ||
| // Receive split change with 1 split belonging to set_1 & set_2 and one belonging to set_3 | ||
| fetchMock.getOnce(baseUrls.sdk + '/splitChanges?since=-1&sets=set_1,set_2', function () { | ||
| return { status: 200, body: splitChange2}; | ||
| }); | ||
| // Receive split change with 1 split belonging to set_1 only | ||
| fetchMock.getOnce(baseUrls.sdk + '/splitChanges?since=1602796638344&sets=set_1,set_2', function () { | ||
| // stored feature flags before update | ||
| const storedFlags = manager.splits(); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags.length === 1, 'only one feature flag should be added'); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags[0].name === 'workm'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(storedFlags[0].sets, ['set_1','set_2']); | ||
| // send split change | ||
| return { status: 200, body: splitChange1}; | ||
| }); | ||
| // Receive split change with 1 split belonging to set_3 only | ||
| fetchMock.getOnce(baseUrls.sdk + '/splitChanges?since=1602797638344&sets=set_1,set_2', function () { | ||
| // stored feature flags before update | ||
| const storedFlags = manager.splits(); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags.length === 1); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags[0].name === 'workm'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(storedFlags[0].sets, ['set_1'], 'the feature flag should be updated'); | ||
| // send split change | ||
| return { status: 200, body: splitChange0}; | ||
| }); | ||
| fetchMock.getOnce(baseUrls.sdk + '/splitChanges?since=1602798638344&sets=set_1,set_2', async function () { | ||
| // stored feature flags before update | ||
| const storedFlags = manager.splits(); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags.length === 0, 'the feature flag should be removed'); | ||
| await factory.client().destroy(); | ||
| assert.end(); | ||
| return { status: 200, body: {} }; | ||
| }); | ||
| // Initialize a factory with polling and sets set_1 & set_2 configured. | ||
| const splitFilters = [{ type: 'bySet', values: ['set_1','set_2'] }]; | ||
| factory = SplitFactory({ ...baseConfig, sync: { splitFilters }}); | ||
| await factory.client().ready(); | ||
| manager = factory.manager(); | ||
| }, 'Polling - SDK with sets configured updates flags according to sets'); | ||
| t.test(async (assert) => { | ||
| let factory; | ||
| let manager; | ||
| // Receive split change with 1 split belonging to set_1 & set_2 and one belonging to set_3 | ||
| fetchMock.getOnce(baseUrls.sdk + '/splitChanges?since=-1', function () { | ||
| return { status: 200, body: splitChange2}; | ||
| }); | ||
| // Receive split change with 1 split belonging to set_1 only | ||
| fetchMock.getOnce(baseUrls.sdk + '/splitChanges?since=1602796638344', function () { | ||
| // stored feature flags before update | ||
| const storedFlags = manager.splits(); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags.length === 2, 'every feature flag should be added'); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags[0].name === 'workm'); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags[1].name === 'workm_set_3'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(storedFlags[0].sets, ['set_1','set_2']); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(storedFlags[1].sets, ['set_3']); | ||
| // send split change | ||
| return { status: 200, body: splitChange1}; | ||
| }); | ||
| // Receive split change with 1 split belonging to set_3 only | ||
| fetchMock.getOnce(baseUrls.sdk + '/splitChanges?since=1602797638344', function () { | ||
| // stored feature flags before update | ||
| const storedFlags = manager.splits(); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags.length === 2); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags[0].name === 'workm'); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags[1].name === 'workm_set_3'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(storedFlags[0].sets, ['set_1'], 'the feature flag should be updated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(storedFlags[1].sets, ['set_3'], 'the feature flag should remain as it was'); | ||
| // send split change | ||
| return { status: 200, body: splitChange0}; | ||
| }); | ||
| fetchMock.getOnce(baseUrls.sdk + '/splitChanges?since=1602798638344', async function () { | ||
| // stored feature flags before update | ||
| const storedFlags = manager.splits(); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags.length === 2); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags[0].name === 'workm'); | ||
| assert.true(storedFlags[1].name === 'workm_set_3'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(storedFlags[0].sets, ['set_3'], 'the feature flag should be updated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(storedFlags[1].sets, ['set_3'], 'the feature flag should remain as it was'); | ||
| await factory.client().destroy(); | ||
| assert.end(); | ||
| return { status: 200, body: {} }; | ||
| }); | ||
| // Initialize a factory with polling and no sets configured. | ||
| factory = SplitFactory(baseConfig); | ||
| await factory.client().ready(); | ||
| manager = factory.manager(); | ||
| }, 'Poling - SDK with no sets configured does not take sets into account when updating flags'); | ||
| // EVALUATION | ||
| t.test(async (assert) => { | ||
| fetchMock.reset(); | ||
| fetchMock.post('*', 200); | ||
| let factory, client = []; | ||
| fetchMock.get(baseUrls.sdk + '/mySegments/nicolas%40split.io', { status: 200, body: { 'mySegments': [] } }); | ||
| // Receive split change with 1 split belonging to set_1 & set_2 and one belonging to set_3 | ||
| fetchMock.getOnce(baseUrls.sdk + '/splitChanges?since=-1&sets=set_1', function () { | ||
| return { status: 200, body: splitChange2}; | ||
| }); | ||
| fetchMock.getOnce(baseUrls.sdk + '/splitChanges?since=1602796638344&sets=set_1', async function () { | ||
| // stored feature flags before update | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsByFlagSet('set_1'), {workm: 'on'}, 'only the flag in set_1 can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsByFlagSet('set_2'), {}, 'only the flag in set_1 can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsByFlagSet('set_3'), {}, 'only the flag in set_1 can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsWithConfigByFlagSet('set_1'), { workm: { treatment: 'on', config: null } }, 'only the flag in set_1 can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsWithConfigByFlagSet('set_2'), {}, 'only the flag in set_1 can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsWithConfigByFlagSet('set_3'), {}, 'only the flag in set_1 can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsByFlagSets(['set_1','set_2','set_3']), {workm: 'on'}, 'only the flag in set_1 can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsWithConfigByFlagSets(['set_1','set_2','set_3']), { workm: { treatment: 'on', config: null } }, 'only the flag in set_1 can be evaluated'); | ||
| await client.destroy(); | ||
| assert.end(); | ||
| // send split change | ||
| return { status: 200, body: splitChange1}; | ||
| }); | ||
| // Initialize a factory with set_1 configured. | ||
| const splitFilters = [{ type: 'bySet', values: ['set_1'] }]; | ||
| factory = SplitFactory({ ...baseConfig, sync: { splitFilters }}); | ||
| client = factory.client(); | ||
| await client.ready(); | ||
| }, 'SDK with sets configured can only evaluate configured sets'); | ||
| t.test(async (assert) => { | ||
| fetchMock.reset(); | ||
| fetchMock.post('*', 200); | ||
| let factory, client = []; | ||
| fetchMock.get(baseUrls.sdk + '/mySegments/nicolas%40split.io', { status: 200, body: { 'mySegments': [] } }); | ||
| // Receive split change with 1 split belonging to set_1 & set_2 and one belonging to set_3 | ||
| fetchMock.getOnce(baseUrls.sdk + '/splitChanges?since=-1', function () { | ||
| return { status: 200, body: splitChange2}; | ||
| }); | ||
| fetchMock.getOnce(baseUrls.sdk + '/splitChanges?since=1602796638344', async function () { | ||
| // stored feature flags before update | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsByFlagSet('set_1'), {workm: 'on'}, 'all flags can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsByFlagSet('set_2'), {workm: 'on'}, 'all flags can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsByFlagSet('set_3'), { workm_set_3: 'on' }, 'all flags can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsWithConfigByFlagSet('set_1'), { workm: { treatment: 'on', config: null } }, 'all flags can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsWithConfigByFlagSet('set_2'), { workm: { treatment: 'on', config: null } }, 'all flags can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsWithConfigByFlagSet('set_3'), { workm_set_3: { treatment: 'on', config: null } }, 'all flags can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsByFlagSets(['set_1','set_2','set_3']), { workm: 'on', workm_set_3: 'on' }, 'all flags can be evaluated'); | ||
| assert.deepEqual(client.getTreatmentsWithConfigByFlagSets(['set_1','set_2','set_3']), { workm: { treatment: 'on', config: null }, workm_set_3: { treatment: 'on', config: null } }, 'all flags can be evaluated'); | ||
| await client.destroy(); | ||
| assert.end(); | ||
| // send split change | ||
| return { status: 200, body: splitChange1}; | ||
| }); | ||
| factory = SplitFactory(baseConfig); | ||
| client = factory.client(); | ||
| await client.ready(); | ||
| }, 'SDK with no sets configured can evaluate any set'); | ||
| } |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a typo here. This should be
. Flag set must .... Consider for polishing in JS-Commons