Skip to content

[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets - #13694

Merged
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
bard-replicator-sets
Jan 28, 2026
Merged

[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets#13694
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
bard-replicator-sets

Conversation

@duncanmcclean

@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean commented Jan 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This pull request aims to fix an issue where an error would occur adding a nested Replicator set (replicator -> bard -> replicator).

The first issue is that we were sending attrs.values to the ReplicatorSetController which we shouldn't have been (it isn't needed for finding sets).

The second issue had to do with how we find the ultimate Bard/Replicator field. We couldn't figure out the logic from #13427 so we rewrote it and added a specific test to cover #13687.

Fixes#13687

@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean linked an issue Jan 27, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong" #13687
Closed
@jasonvarga
jasonvarga merged commit 6b418a1 into masterJan 28, 2026
11 checks passed
@jasonvarga
jasonvarga deleted the bard-replicator-sets branch January 28, 2026 02:49
@o1yo1y mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2026
Closed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"

2 participants

@duncanmcclean@jasonvarga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets by duncanmcclean · Pull Request #13694 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets - #13694
Merged
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Jan 28, 2026
Merged
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets#13694
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Conversation
@duncanmcclean
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
commented
Jan 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This pull request aims to fix an issue where an error would occur adding a nested Replicator set (replicator -> bard -> replicator).
The first issue is that we were sending attrs.values to the ReplicatorSetController which we shouldn't have been (it isn't needed for finding sets).
The second issue had to do with how we find the ultimate Bard/Replicator field. We couldn't figure out the logic from #13427 so we rewrote it and added a specific test to cover #13687.
Fixes#13687
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
linked an issue
Jan 27, 2026
that may be
closed
by this pull request


[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"
#13687

Closed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
merged commit 6b418a1
into
masterJan 28, 2026

11 checks passed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
deleted the

bard-replicator-sets

branch
January 28, 2026 02:49
@o1yo1y
mentioned this pull request
Jan 28, 2026

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"


2 participants

@duncanmcclean@jasonvarga

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets by duncanmcclean · Pull Request #13694 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets - #13694
Merged
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Jan 28, 2026
Merged
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets#13694
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Conversation
@duncanmcclean
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
commented
Jan 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This pull request aims to fix an issue where an error would occur adding a nested Replicator set (replicator -> bard -> replicator).
The first issue is that we were sending attrs.values to the ReplicatorSetController which we shouldn't have been (it isn't needed for finding sets).
The second issue had to do with how we find the ultimate Bard/Replicator field. We couldn't figure out the logic from #13427 so we rewrote it and added a specific test to cover #13687.
Fixes#13687
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
linked an issue
Jan 27, 2026
that may be
closed
by this pull request


[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"
#13687

Closed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
merged commit 6b418a1
into
masterJan 28, 2026

11 checks passed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
deleted the

bard-replicator-sets

branch
January 28, 2026 02:49
@o1yo1y
mentioned this pull request
Jan 28, 2026

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"


2 participants

@duncanmcclean@jasonvarga

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets by duncanmcclean · Pull Request #13694 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets - #13694
Merged
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Jan 28, 2026
Merged
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets#13694
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Conversation
@duncanmcclean
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
commented
Jan 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This pull request aims to fix an issue where an error would occur adding a nested Replicator set (replicator -> bard -> replicator).
The first issue is that we were sending attrs.values to the ReplicatorSetController which we shouldn't have been (it isn't needed for finding sets).
The second issue had to do with how we find the ultimate Bard/Replicator field. We couldn't figure out the logic from #13427 so we rewrote it and added a specific test to cover #13687.
Fixes#13687
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
linked an issue
Jan 27, 2026
that may be
closed
by this pull request


[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"
#13687

Closed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
merged commit 6b418a1
into
masterJan 28, 2026

11 checks passed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
deleted the

bard-replicator-sets

branch
January 28, 2026 02:49
@o1yo1y
mentioned this pull request
Jan 28, 2026

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"


2 participants

@duncanmcclean@jasonvarga

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets by duncanmcclean · Pull Request #13694 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets - #13694
Merged
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Jan 28, 2026
Merged
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets#13694
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Conversation
@duncanmcclean
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
commented
Jan 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This pull request aims to fix an issue where an error would occur adding a nested Replicator set (replicator -> bard -> replicator).
The first issue is that we were sending attrs.values to the ReplicatorSetController which we shouldn't have been (it isn't needed for finding sets).
The second issue had to do with how we find the ultimate Bard/Replicator field. We couldn't figure out the logic from #13427 so we rewrote it and added a specific test to cover #13687.
Fixes#13687
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
linked an issue
Jan 27, 2026
that may be
closed
by this pull request


[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"
#13687

Closed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
merged commit 6b418a1
into
masterJan 28, 2026

11 checks passed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
deleted the

bard-replicator-sets

branch
January 28, 2026 02:49
@o1yo1y
mentioned this pull request
Jan 28, 2026

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"


2 participants

@duncanmcclean@jasonvarga

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets by duncanmcclean · Pull Request #13694 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets - #13694
Merged
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Jan 28, 2026
Merged
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets#13694
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Conversation
@duncanmcclean
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
commented
Jan 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This pull request aims to fix an issue where an error would occur adding a nested Replicator set (replicator -> bard -> replicator).
The first issue is that we were sending attrs.values to the ReplicatorSetController which we shouldn't have been (it isn't needed for finding sets).
The second issue had to do with how we find the ultimate Bard/Replicator field. We couldn't figure out the logic from #13427 so we rewrote it and added a specific test to cover #13687.
Fixes#13687
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
linked an issue
Jan 27, 2026
that may be
closed
by this pull request


[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"
#13687

Closed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
merged commit 6b418a1
into
masterJan 28, 2026

11 checks passed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
deleted the

bard-replicator-sets

branch
January 28, 2026 02:49
@o1yo1y
mentioned this pull request
Jan 28, 2026

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"


2 participants

@duncanmcclean@jasonvarga

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets by duncanmcclean · Pull Request #13694 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets - #13694
Merged
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Jan 28, 2026
Merged
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets#13694
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Conversation
@duncanmcclean
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
commented
Jan 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This pull request aims to fix an issue where an error would occur adding a nested Replicator set (replicator -> bard -> replicator).
The first issue is that we were sending attrs.values to the ReplicatorSetController which we shouldn't have been (it isn't needed for finding sets).
The second issue had to do with how we find the ultimate Bard/Replicator field. We couldn't figure out the logic from #13427 so we rewrote it and added a specific test to cover #13687.
Fixes#13687
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
linked an issue
Jan 27, 2026
that may be
closed
by this pull request


[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"
#13687

Closed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
merged commit 6b418a1
into
masterJan 28, 2026

11 checks passed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
deleted the

bard-replicator-sets

branch
January 28, 2026 02:49
@o1yo1y
mentioned this pull request
Jan 28, 2026

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"


2 participants

@duncanmcclean@jasonvarga

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets by duncanmcclean · Pull Request #13694 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets - #13694
Merged
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Jan 28, 2026
Merged
[6.x] Fix adding nested replicator sets#13694
jasonvarga merged 4 commits into
masterfrom 
bard-replicator-sets
Conversation
@duncanmcclean
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
commented
Jan 27, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
This pull request aims to fix an issue where an error would occur adding a nested Replicator set (replicator -> bard -> replicator).
The first issue is that we were sending attrs.values to the ReplicatorSetController which we shouldn't have been (it isn't needed for finding sets).
The second issue had to do with how we find the ultimate Bard/Replicator field. We couldn't figure out the logic from #13427 so we rewrote it and added a specific test to cover #13687.
Fixes#13687
@duncanmccleanduncanmcclean
linked an issue
Jan 27, 2026
that may be
closed
by this pull request


[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"
#13687

Closed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
merged commit 6b418a1
into
masterJan 28, 2026

11 checks passed

@jasonvarga
jasonvarga
deleted the

bard-replicator-sets

branch
January 28, 2026 02:49
@o1yo1y
mentioned this pull request
Jan 28, 2026

Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[6.x] Adding set in nested Replicator causes "Something went wrong"


2 participants

@duncanmcclean@jasonvarga