Skip to content

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry - #9652

Closed
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties
Closed

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry#9652
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties

Conversation

@JohnathonKoster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds instance caches/properties for the date/time related properties on the Entry class.

@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2024
37 tasks
jasonvarga
jasonvarga previously requested changes Mar 7, 2024

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please target master and adjust the PR title to show [5.x].

@JohnathonKoster
JohnathonKoster changed the base branch from 4.x to masterMarch 8, 2024 01:19
@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster changed the title [4.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entryMar 8, 2024
@jasonvarga
jasonvarga dismissed their stale reviewMarch 11, 2024 16:54

Requested changes were made.

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll need to test this theory, but I have a feeling if you change a collection from dated to not (or visa versa) all the entries sitting in the stache/cache will still have the cached property set to the old value.

@jasonvarga

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was able to get those properties into an incorrect state.

I think the fact the hasTime and hasSeconds methods both are accessing a blueprint field is the slow part. Jesse brought up a good point in that we should probably cache it per-blueprint instead of per-entry because the value will be shared across multiple entries. Two entries calling hasTime would still load the blueprint and field for each.

Rather than try to figure out how to bust the current properties, I think we'll tinker with an alternative of caching the blueprint field across entries.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@JohnathonKoster@jasonvarga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry by JohnathonKoster · Pull Request #9652 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry - #9652

Closed
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties
Closed

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry#9652
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties

Conversation

@JohnathonKoster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds instance caches/properties for the date/time related properties on the Entry class.

@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2024
37 tasks
jasonvarga
jasonvarga previously requested changes Mar 7, 2024

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please target master and adjust the PR title to show [5.x].

@JohnathonKoster
JohnathonKoster changed the base branch from 4.x to masterMarch 8, 2024 01:19
@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster changed the title [4.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entryMar 8, 2024
@jasonvarga
jasonvarga dismissed their stale reviewMarch 11, 2024 16:54

Requested changes were made.

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll need to test this theory, but I have a feeling if you change a collection from dated to not (or visa versa) all the entries sitting in the stache/cache will still have the cached property set to the old value.

@jasonvarga

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was able to get those properties into an incorrect state.

I think the fact the hasTime and hasSeconds methods both are accessing a blueprint field is the slow part. Jesse brought up a good point in that we should probably cache it per-blueprint instead of per-entry because the value will be shared across multiple entries. Two entries calling hasTime would still load the blueprint and field for each.

Rather than try to figure out how to bust the current properties, I think we'll tinker with an alternative of caching the blueprint field across entries.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@JohnathonKoster@jasonvarga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry by JohnathonKoster · Pull Request #9652 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry - #9652

Closed
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties
Closed

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry#9652
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties

Conversation

@JohnathonKoster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds instance caches/properties for the date/time related properties on the Entry class.

@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2024
37 tasks
jasonvarga
jasonvarga previously requested changes Mar 7, 2024

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please target master and adjust the PR title to show [5.x].

@JohnathonKoster
JohnathonKoster changed the base branch from 4.x to masterMarch 8, 2024 01:19
@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster changed the title [4.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entryMar 8, 2024
@jasonvarga
jasonvarga dismissed their stale reviewMarch 11, 2024 16:54

Requested changes were made.

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll need to test this theory, but I have a feeling if you change a collection from dated to not (or visa versa) all the entries sitting in the stache/cache will still have the cached property set to the old value.

@jasonvarga

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was able to get those properties into an incorrect state.

I think the fact the hasTime and hasSeconds methods both are accessing a blueprint field is the slow part. Jesse brought up a good point in that we should probably cache it per-blueprint instead of per-entry because the value will be shared across multiple entries. Two entries calling hasTime would still load the blueprint and field for each.

Rather than try to figure out how to bust the current properties, I think we'll tinker with an alternative of caching the blueprint field across entries.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@JohnathonKoster@jasonvarga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry by JohnathonKoster · Pull Request #9652 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry - #9652

Closed
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties
Closed

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry#9652
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties

Conversation

@JohnathonKoster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds instance caches/properties for the date/time related properties on the Entry class.

@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2024
37 tasks
jasonvarga
jasonvarga previously requested changes Mar 7, 2024

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please target master and adjust the PR title to show [5.x].

@JohnathonKoster
JohnathonKoster changed the base branch from 4.x to masterMarch 8, 2024 01:19
@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster changed the title [4.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entryMar 8, 2024
@jasonvarga
jasonvarga dismissed their stale reviewMarch 11, 2024 16:54

Requested changes were made.

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll need to test this theory, but I have a feeling if you change a collection from dated to not (or visa versa) all the entries sitting in the stache/cache will still have the cached property set to the old value.

@jasonvarga

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was able to get those properties into an incorrect state.

I think the fact the hasTime and hasSeconds methods both are accessing a blueprint field is the slow part. Jesse brought up a good point in that we should probably cache it per-blueprint instead of per-entry because the value will be shared across multiple entries. Two entries calling hasTime would still load the blueprint and field for each.

Rather than try to figure out how to bust the current properties, I think we'll tinker with an alternative of caching the blueprint field across entries.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@JohnathonKoster@jasonvarga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' [5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry by JohnathonKoster · Pull Request #9652 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry - #9652

Closed
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties
Closed

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry#9652
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties

Conversation

@JohnathonKoster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds instance caches/properties for the date/time related properties on the Entry class.

@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2024
37 tasks
jasonvarga
jasonvarga previously requested changes Mar 7, 2024

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please target master and adjust the PR title to show [5.x].

@JohnathonKoster
JohnathonKoster changed the base branch from 4.x to masterMarch 8, 2024 01:19
@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster changed the title [4.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entryMar 8, 2024
@jasonvarga
jasonvarga dismissed their stale reviewMarch 11, 2024 16:54

Requested changes were made.

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll need to test this theory, but I have a feeling if you change a collection from dated to not (or visa versa) all the entries sitting in the stache/cache will still have the cached property set to the old value.

@jasonvarga

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was able to get those properties into an incorrect state.

I think the fact the hasTime and hasSeconds methods both are accessing a blueprint field is the slow part. Jesse brought up a good point in that we should probably cache it per-blueprint instead of per-entry because the value will be shared across multiple entries. Two entries calling hasTime would still load the blueprint and field for each.

Rather than try to figure out how to bust the current properties, I think we'll tinker with an alternative of caching the blueprint field across entries.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@JohnathonKoster@jasonvarga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry by JohnathonKoster · Pull Request #9652 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry - #9652

Closed
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties
Closed

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry#9652
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties

Conversation

@JohnathonKoster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds instance caches/properties for the date/time related properties on the Entry class.

@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2024
37 tasks
jasonvarga
jasonvarga previously requested changes Mar 7, 2024

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please target master and adjust the PR title to show [5.x].

@JohnathonKoster
JohnathonKoster changed the base branch from 4.x to masterMarch 8, 2024 01:19
@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster changed the title [4.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entryMar 8, 2024
@jasonvarga
jasonvarga dismissed their stale reviewMarch 11, 2024 16:54

Requested changes were made.

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll need to test this theory, but I have a feeling if you change a collection from dated to not (or visa versa) all the entries sitting in the stache/cache will still have the cached property set to the old value.

@jasonvarga

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was able to get those properties into an incorrect state.

I think the fact the hasTime and hasSeconds methods both are accessing a blueprint field is the slow part. Jesse brought up a good point in that we should probably cache it per-blueprint instead of per-entry because the value will be shared across multiple entries. Two entries calling hasTime would still load the blueprint and field for each.

Rather than try to figure out how to bust the current properties, I think we'll tinker with an alternative of caching the blueprint field across entries.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@JohnathonKoster@jasonvarga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry by JohnathonKoster · Pull Request #9652 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry - #9652

Closed
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties
Closed

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry#9652
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties

Conversation

@JohnathonKoster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds instance caches/properties for the date/time related properties on the Entry class.

@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2024
37 tasks
jasonvarga
jasonvarga previously requested changes Mar 7, 2024

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please target master and adjust the PR title to show [5.x].

@JohnathonKoster
JohnathonKoster changed the base branch from 4.x to masterMarch 8, 2024 01:19
@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster changed the title [4.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entryMar 8, 2024
@jasonvarga
jasonvarga dismissed their stale reviewMarch 11, 2024 16:54

Requested changes were made.

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll need to test this theory, but I have a feeling if you change a collection from dated to not (or visa versa) all the entries sitting in the stache/cache will still have the cached property set to the old value.

@jasonvarga

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was able to get those properties into an incorrect state.

I think the fact the hasTime and hasSeconds methods both are accessing a blueprint field is the slow part. Jesse brought up a good point in that we should probably cache it per-blueprint instead of per-entry because the value will be shared across multiple entries. Two entries calling hasTime would still load the blueprint and field for each.

Rather than try to figure out how to bust the current properties, I think we'll tinker with an alternative of caching the blueprint field across entries.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@JohnathonKoster@jasonvarga
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); [5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry by JohnathonKoster · Pull Request #9652 · statamic/cms · GitHub
Skip to content

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry - #9652

Closed
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties
Closed

[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry#9652
JohnathonKoster wants to merge 6 commits into
statamic:masterfrom
JohnathonKoster:entry-cache-date-time-related-properties

Conversation

@JohnathonKoster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds instance caches/properties for the date/time related properties on the Entry class.

@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2024
37 tasks
jasonvarga
jasonvarga previously requested changes Mar 7, 2024

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please target master and adjust the PR title to show [5.x].

@JohnathonKoster
JohnathonKoster changed the base branch from 4.x to masterMarch 8, 2024 01:19
@JohnathonKosterJohnathonKoster changed the title [4.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entry[5.x] Cache entry date/time related properties on entryMar 8, 2024
@jasonvarga
jasonvarga dismissed their stale reviewMarch 11, 2024 16:54

Requested changes were made.

@jasonvargajasonvarga left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll need to test this theory, but I have a feeling if you change a collection from dated to not (or visa versa) all the entries sitting in the stache/cache will still have the cached property set to the old value.

@jasonvarga

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was able to get those properties into an incorrect state.

I think the fact the hasTime and hasSeconds methods both are accessing a blueprint field is the slow part. Jesse brought up a good point in that we should probably cache it per-blueprint instead of per-entry because the value will be shared across multiple entries. Two entries calling hasTime would still load the blueprint and field for each.

Rather than try to figure out how to bust the current properties, I think we'll tinker with an alternative of caching the blueprint field across entries.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@JohnathonKoster@jasonvarga