Skip to content

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 - #392

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3
Closed

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3#392
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabotdependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.

Changelog

Sourced from github/codeql-action's changelog.

CodeQL Action Changelog

[UNRELEASED]

No user facing changes.

2.3.3 - 04 May 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.1. #1664
  • You can now configure CodeQL within your code scanning workflow by passing a config input to the init Action. See Using a custom configuration file for more information about configuring code scanning. #1590

2.3.2 - 27 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.1 - 26 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.0 - 21 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.0. #1649
  • Bump the minimum CodeQL bundle version to 2.8.5. #1618

2.2.12 - 13 Apr 2023

  • Include the value of the GITHUB_RUN_ATTEMPT environment variable in the telemetry sent to GitHub. #1640
  • Improve the ease of debugging failed runs configured using default setup. The CodeQL Action will now upload diagnostic information to Code Scanning from failed runs configured using default setup. You can view this diagnostic information on the tool status page. #1619

2.2.11 - 06 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.2.10 - 05 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.6. #1629

2.2.9 - 27 Mar 2023

  • Customers post-processing the SARIF output of the analyze Action before uploading it to Code Scanning will benefit from an improved debugging experience. #1598
    • The CodeQL Action will now upload a SARIF file with debugging information to Code Scanning on failed runs for customers using upload: false. Previously, this was only available for customers using the default value of the upload input.
    • The upload input to the analyze Action now accepts the following values:
      • always is the default value, which uploads the SARIF file to Code Scanning for successful and failed runs.
      • failure-only is recommended for customers post-processing the SARIF file before uploading it to Code Scanning. This option uploads debugging information to Code Scanning for failed runs to improve the debugging experience.
      • never avoids uploading the SARIF file to Code Scanning even if the code scanning run fails. This is not recommended for external users since it complicates debugging.
      • The legacy true and false options will be interpreted as always and failure-only respectively.

2.2.8 - 22 Mar 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.5. #1585

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 29b1f65 Merge pull request #1669 from github/update-v2.3.3-318bcc7f8
  • 140500d Update changelog for v2.3.3
  • 318bcc7 Merge pull request #1664 from github/update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • f72bf5d Fix workflow formatting
  • 3346195 Merge branch 'main' into update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • 8ca5570 Merge pull request #1666 from github/aeisenberg/readme-update
  • b1b3d00 Add link to changenote for custom config
  • d2f6dfd Merge pull request #1665 from github/aeisenberg/config-param
  • cba5616 Update CHANGELOG.md
  • 40c9593 Add changelog note
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabotdependabotBot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code labels May 5, 2023

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below. As we have used multiple ways to analyze the diff, our bot will create multiple comments with code feedback

Code Reviewer Model Name: json_output

Code Comments

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Use of ambiguous comment",
"Description": "Change '# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.' to '# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub’s code scanning dashboard.' to be more specific."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
}
]

For the code change provided, I have identified the following:

  1. Severity Medium: Use of ambiguous comment. The comment "# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard." is not very specific and could lead to confusion. According to the book "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin, comments should be used to clarify code that is difficult to understand, but they should not be a substitute for clear code. The recommendation is to change the comment to something more specific like "# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.".

  2. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

  3. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Update Initialize, Autobuild and Analyze actions to latest version",
"Description": "The CodeQL tools for scanning and analysis should be kept up to date for better security and functionality. It is recommended to use the latest version of these actions."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Enable or add CodeQL tool cache",
"Description": "Caching CodeQL tools can significantly speed up your analysis and save resources. It is recommended to enable or add codeql tool cache to your workflow."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Avoid using sensitive environment variables as plain text",
"Description": "Sensitive environment variables such as access tokens and keys should not be kept as plain text. It is recommended to use Github secrets, Hashicorp Vault or other secure credential storage and retrieval mechanisms, and add them as appropriate environment variables at runtime."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Prevent Pull Request to execute secret-enabled workflows",
"Description": "Workflows that use secrets should not be triggered on pull requests from forks, as these can be used to extract secrets. It is recommended to add a \"pull_request_target\" event instead of \"pull_request\" or limit triggers to \"push\" events only, if possible."
}
]

All recommendations are based on authoritative sources such as the CodeQL documentation (Github), the 12 Factor App Methodology (12 Factor App) and the Docker documentation (Docker).

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below.

Code Reviewer Model Name: beta

Code Comments

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

  • Upgrade CodeQL dependencies to latest version for better security.
  • Consider updating the query configuration to include custom queries if deemed necessary.
  • Consider adding a step to manually build compiled languages in case the Autobuild step fails.
  • None of the changes made in this patch seem to have any security implications.

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

  1. It is good practice to include a comment explaining the purpose of the code block, such as why the Sarif file is being uploaded and what value it provides to the team.
  2. Use a specific tag version for the codeql-action/upload-sarif step to prevent unexpected changes or compatibility issues.
  3. Consider adding a step to verify the integrity of the Sarif file before uploading, such as a checksum check, to ensure that the data is not corrupted or tampered with.

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.40%. Comparing base (bf2b016) to head (377c320).
⚠️ Report is 56 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #392 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.88% 68.40% -0.48% 
==========================================
Files 15 15 Lines 1671 1671 ==========================================
- Hits 1151 1143 -8 - Misses 399 409 +10 + Partials 121 119 -2 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from e81a29f to 1ef73a2CompareMay 7, 2023 18:51
Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](github/codeql-action@5f53256...29b1f65)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-major
...
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from 1ef73a2 to 377c320CompareMay 15, 2023 01:33
@dependabot@github

dependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 25, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Superseded by #402.

@dependabotdependabotBot closed this May 25, 2023
@dependabot
dependabotBot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch May 25, 2023 01:58
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependenciesPull requests that update a dependency filegithub_actionsPull requests that update Github_actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@codecov-commenter@step-security-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 by dependabot[bot] · Pull Request #392 · step-security/agent · GitHub
Skip to content

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 - #392

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3
Closed

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3#392
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabotdependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.

Changelog

Sourced from github/codeql-action's changelog.

CodeQL Action Changelog

[UNRELEASED]

No user facing changes.

2.3.3 - 04 May 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.1. #1664
  • You can now configure CodeQL within your code scanning workflow by passing a config input to the init Action. See Using a custom configuration file for more information about configuring code scanning. #1590

2.3.2 - 27 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.1 - 26 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.0 - 21 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.0. #1649
  • Bump the minimum CodeQL bundle version to 2.8.5. #1618

2.2.12 - 13 Apr 2023

  • Include the value of the GITHUB_RUN_ATTEMPT environment variable in the telemetry sent to GitHub. #1640
  • Improve the ease of debugging failed runs configured using default setup. The CodeQL Action will now upload diagnostic information to Code Scanning from failed runs configured using default setup. You can view this diagnostic information on the tool status page. #1619

2.2.11 - 06 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.2.10 - 05 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.6. #1629

2.2.9 - 27 Mar 2023

  • Customers post-processing the SARIF output of the analyze Action before uploading it to Code Scanning will benefit from an improved debugging experience. #1598
    • The CodeQL Action will now upload a SARIF file with debugging information to Code Scanning on failed runs for customers using upload: false. Previously, this was only available for customers using the default value of the upload input.
    • The upload input to the analyze Action now accepts the following values:
      • always is the default value, which uploads the SARIF file to Code Scanning for successful and failed runs.
      • failure-only is recommended for customers post-processing the SARIF file before uploading it to Code Scanning. This option uploads debugging information to Code Scanning for failed runs to improve the debugging experience.
      • never avoids uploading the SARIF file to Code Scanning even if the code scanning run fails. This is not recommended for external users since it complicates debugging.
      • The legacy true and false options will be interpreted as always and failure-only respectively.

2.2.8 - 22 Mar 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.5. #1585

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 29b1f65 Merge pull request #1669 from github/update-v2.3.3-318bcc7f8
  • 140500d Update changelog for v2.3.3
  • 318bcc7 Merge pull request #1664 from github/update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • f72bf5d Fix workflow formatting
  • 3346195 Merge branch 'main' into update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • 8ca5570 Merge pull request #1666 from github/aeisenberg/readme-update
  • b1b3d00 Add link to changenote for custom config
  • d2f6dfd Merge pull request #1665 from github/aeisenberg/config-param
  • cba5616 Update CHANGELOG.md
  • 40c9593 Add changelog note
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabotdependabotBot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code labels May 5, 2023

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below. As we have used multiple ways to analyze the diff, our bot will create multiple comments with code feedback

Code Reviewer Model Name: json_output

Code Comments

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Use of ambiguous comment",
"Description": "Change '# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.' to '# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub’s code scanning dashboard.' to be more specific."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
}
]

For the code change provided, I have identified the following:

  1. Severity Medium: Use of ambiguous comment. The comment "# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard." is not very specific and could lead to confusion. According to the book "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin, comments should be used to clarify code that is difficult to understand, but they should not be a substitute for clear code. The recommendation is to change the comment to something more specific like "# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.".

  2. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

  3. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Update Initialize, Autobuild and Analyze actions to latest version",
"Description": "The CodeQL tools for scanning and analysis should be kept up to date for better security and functionality. It is recommended to use the latest version of these actions."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Enable or add CodeQL tool cache",
"Description": "Caching CodeQL tools can significantly speed up your analysis and save resources. It is recommended to enable or add codeql tool cache to your workflow."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Avoid using sensitive environment variables as plain text",
"Description": "Sensitive environment variables such as access tokens and keys should not be kept as plain text. It is recommended to use Github secrets, Hashicorp Vault or other secure credential storage and retrieval mechanisms, and add them as appropriate environment variables at runtime."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Prevent Pull Request to execute secret-enabled workflows",
"Description": "Workflows that use secrets should not be triggered on pull requests from forks, as these can be used to extract secrets. It is recommended to add a \"pull_request_target\" event instead of \"pull_request\" or limit triggers to \"push\" events only, if possible."
}
]

All recommendations are based on authoritative sources such as the CodeQL documentation (Github), the 12 Factor App Methodology (12 Factor App) and the Docker documentation (Docker).

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below.

Code Reviewer Model Name: beta

Code Comments

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

  • Upgrade CodeQL dependencies to latest version for better security.
  • Consider updating the query configuration to include custom queries if deemed necessary.
  • Consider adding a step to manually build compiled languages in case the Autobuild step fails.
  • None of the changes made in this patch seem to have any security implications.

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

  1. It is good practice to include a comment explaining the purpose of the code block, such as why the Sarif file is being uploaded and what value it provides to the team.
  2. Use a specific tag version for the codeql-action/upload-sarif step to prevent unexpected changes or compatibility issues.
  3. Consider adding a step to verify the integrity of the Sarif file before uploading, such as a checksum check, to ensure that the data is not corrupted or tampered with.

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.40%. Comparing base (bf2b016) to head (377c320).
⚠️ Report is 56 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #392 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.88% 68.40% -0.48% 
==========================================
Files 15 15 Lines 1671 1671 ==========================================
- Hits 1151 1143 -8 - Misses 399 409 +10 + Partials 121 119 -2 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from e81a29f to 1ef73a2CompareMay 7, 2023 18:51
Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](github/codeql-action@5f53256...29b1f65)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-major
...
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from 1ef73a2 to 377c320CompareMay 15, 2023 01:33
@dependabot@github

dependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 25, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Superseded by #402.

@dependabotdependabotBot closed this May 25, 2023
@dependabot
dependabotBot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch May 25, 2023 01:58
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependenciesPull requests that update a dependency filegithub_actionsPull requests that update Github_actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@codecov-commenter@step-security-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 by dependabot[bot] · Pull Request #392 · step-security/agent · GitHub
Skip to content

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 - #392

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3
Closed

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3#392
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabotdependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.

Changelog

Sourced from github/codeql-action's changelog.

CodeQL Action Changelog

[UNRELEASED]

No user facing changes.

2.3.3 - 04 May 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.1. #1664
  • You can now configure CodeQL within your code scanning workflow by passing a config input to the init Action. See Using a custom configuration file for more information about configuring code scanning. #1590

2.3.2 - 27 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.1 - 26 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.0 - 21 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.0. #1649
  • Bump the minimum CodeQL bundle version to 2.8.5. #1618

2.2.12 - 13 Apr 2023

  • Include the value of the GITHUB_RUN_ATTEMPT environment variable in the telemetry sent to GitHub. #1640
  • Improve the ease of debugging failed runs configured using default setup. The CodeQL Action will now upload diagnostic information to Code Scanning from failed runs configured using default setup. You can view this diagnostic information on the tool status page. #1619

2.2.11 - 06 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.2.10 - 05 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.6. #1629

2.2.9 - 27 Mar 2023

  • Customers post-processing the SARIF output of the analyze Action before uploading it to Code Scanning will benefit from an improved debugging experience. #1598
    • The CodeQL Action will now upload a SARIF file with debugging information to Code Scanning on failed runs for customers using upload: false. Previously, this was only available for customers using the default value of the upload input.
    • The upload input to the analyze Action now accepts the following values:
      • always is the default value, which uploads the SARIF file to Code Scanning for successful and failed runs.
      • failure-only is recommended for customers post-processing the SARIF file before uploading it to Code Scanning. This option uploads debugging information to Code Scanning for failed runs to improve the debugging experience.
      • never avoids uploading the SARIF file to Code Scanning even if the code scanning run fails. This is not recommended for external users since it complicates debugging.
      • The legacy true and false options will be interpreted as always and failure-only respectively.

2.2.8 - 22 Mar 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.5. #1585

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 29b1f65 Merge pull request #1669 from github/update-v2.3.3-318bcc7f8
  • 140500d Update changelog for v2.3.3
  • 318bcc7 Merge pull request #1664 from github/update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • f72bf5d Fix workflow formatting
  • 3346195 Merge branch 'main' into update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • 8ca5570 Merge pull request #1666 from github/aeisenberg/readme-update
  • b1b3d00 Add link to changenote for custom config
  • d2f6dfd Merge pull request #1665 from github/aeisenberg/config-param
  • cba5616 Update CHANGELOG.md
  • 40c9593 Add changelog note
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabotdependabotBot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code labels May 5, 2023

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below. As we have used multiple ways to analyze the diff, our bot will create multiple comments with code feedback

Code Reviewer Model Name: json_output

Code Comments

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Use of ambiguous comment",
"Description": "Change '# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.' to '# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub’s code scanning dashboard.' to be more specific."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
}
]

For the code change provided, I have identified the following:

  1. Severity Medium: Use of ambiguous comment. The comment "# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard." is not very specific and could lead to confusion. According to the book "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin, comments should be used to clarify code that is difficult to understand, but they should not be a substitute for clear code. The recommendation is to change the comment to something more specific like "# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.".

  2. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

  3. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Update Initialize, Autobuild and Analyze actions to latest version",
"Description": "The CodeQL tools for scanning and analysis should be kept up to date for better security and functionality. It is recommended to use the latest version of these actions."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Enable or add CodeQL tool cache",
"Description": "Caching CodeQL tools can significantly speed up your analysis and save resources. It is recommended to enable or add codeql tool cache to your workflow."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Avoid using sensitive environment variables as plain text",
"Description": "Sensitive environment variables such as access tokens and keys should not be kept as plain text. It is recommended to use Github secrets, Hashicorp Vault or other secure credential storage and retrieval mechanisms, and add them as appropriate environment variables at runtime."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Prevent Pull Request to execute secret-enabled workflows",
"Description": "Workflows that use secrets should not be triggered on pull requests from forks, as these can be used to extract secrets. It is recommended to add a \"pull_request_target\" event instead of \"pull_request\" or limit triggers to \"push\" events only, if possible."
}
]

All recommendations are based on authoritative sources such as the CodeQL documentation (Github), the 12 Factor App Methodology (12 Factor App) and the Docker documentation (Docker).

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below.

Code Reviewer Model Name: beta

Code Comments

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

  • Upgrade CodeQL dependencies to latest version for better security.
  • Consider updating the query configuration to include custom queries if deemed necessary.
  • Consider adding a step to manually build compiled languages in case the Autobuild step fails.
  • None of the changes made in this patch seem to have any security implications.

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

  1. It is good practice to include a comment explaining the purpose of the code block, such as why the Sarif file is being uploaded and what value it provides to the team.
  2. Use a specific tag version for the codeql-action/upload-sarif step to prevent unexpected changes or compatibility issues.
  3. Consider adding a step to verify the integrity of the Sarif file before uploading, such as a checksum check, to ensure that the data is not corrupted or tampered with.

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.40%. Comparing base (bf2b016) to head (377c320).
⚠️ Report is 56 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #392 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.88% 68.40% -0.48% 
==========================================
Files 15 15 Lines 1671 1671 ==========================================
- Hits 1151 1143 -8 - Misses 399 409 +10 + Partials 121 119 -2 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from e81a29f to 1ef73a2CompareMay 7, 2023 18:51
Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](github/codeql-action@5f53256...29b1f65)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-major
...
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from 1ef73a2 to 377c320CompareMay 15, 2023 01:33
@dependabot@github

dependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 25, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Superseded by #402.

@dependabotdependabotBot closed this May 25, 2023
@dependabot
dependabotBot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch May 25, 2023 01:58
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependenciesPull requests that update a dependency filegithub_actionsPull requests that update Github_actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@codecov-commenter@step-security-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 by dependabot[bot] · Pull Request #392 · step-security/agent · GitHub
Skip to content

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 - #392

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3
Closed

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3#392
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabotdependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.

Changelog

Sourced from github/codeql-action's changelog.

CodeQL Action Changelog

[UNRELEASED]

No user facing changes.

2.3.3 - 04 May 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.1. #1664
  • You can now configure CodeQL within your code scanning workflow by passing a config input to the init Action. See Using a custom configuration file for more information about configuring code scanning. #1590

2.3.2 - 27 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.1 - 26 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.0 - 21 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.0. #1649
  • Bump the minimum CodeQL bundle version to 2.8.5. #1618

2.2.12 - 13 Apr 2023

  • Include the value of the GITHUB_RUN_ATTEMPT environment variable in the telemetry sent to GitHub. #1640
  • Improve the ease of debugging failed runs configured using default setup. The CodeQL Action will now upload diagnostic information to Code Scanning from failed runs configured using default setup. You can view this diagnostic information on the tool status page. #1619

2.2.11 - 06 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.2.10 - 05 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.6. #1629

2.2.9 - 27 Mar 2023

  • Customers post-processing the SARIF output of the analyze Action before uploading it to Code Scanning will benefit from an improved debugging experience. #1598
    • The CodeQL Action will now upload a SARIF file with debugging information to Code Scanning on failed runs for customers using upload: false. Previously, this was only available for customers using the default value of the upload input.
    • The upload input to the analyze Action now accepts the following values:
      • always is the default value, which uploads the SARIF file to Code Scanning for successful and failed runs.
      • failure-only is recommended for customers post-processing the SARIF file before uploading it to Code Scanning. This option uploads debugging information to Code Scanning for failed runs to improve the debugging experience.
      • never avoids uploading the SARIF file to Code Scanning even if the code scanning run fails. This is not recommended for external users since it complicates debugging.
      • The legacy true and false options will be interpreted as always and failure-only respectively.

2.2.8 - 22 Mar 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.5. #1585

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 29b1f65 Merge pull request #1669 from github/update-v2.3.3-318bcc7f8
  • 140500d Update changelog for v2.3.3
  • 318bcc7 Merge pull request #1664 from github/update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • f72bf5d Fix workflow formatting
  • 3346195 Merge branch 'main' into update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • 8ca5570 Merge pull request #1666 from github/aeisenberg/readme-update
  • b1b3d00 Add link to changenote for custom config
  • d2f6dfd Merge pull request #1665 from github/aeisenberg/config-param
  • cba5616 Update CHANGELOG.md
  • 40c9593 Add changelog note
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabotdependabotBot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code labels May 5, 2023

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below. As we have used multiple ways to analyze the diff, our bot will create multiple comments with code feedback

Code Reviewer Model Name: json_output

Code Comments

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Use of ambiguous comment",
"Description": "Change '# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.' to '# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub’s code scanning dashboard.' to be more specific."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
}
]

For the code change provided, I have identified the following:

  1. Severity Medium: Use of ambiguous comment. The comment "# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard." is not very specific and could lead to confusion. According to the book "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin, comments should be used to clarify code that is difficult to understand, but they should not be a substitute for clear code. The recommendation is to change the comment to something more specific like "# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.".

  2. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

  3. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Update Initialize, Autobuild and Analyze actions to latest version",
"Description": "The CodeQL tools for scanning and analysis should be kept up to date for better security and functionality. It is recommended to use the latest version of these actions."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Enable or add CodeQL tool cache",
"Description": "Caching CodeQL tools can significantly speed up your analysis and save resources. It is recommended to enable or add codeql tool cache to your workflow."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Avoid using sensitive environment variables as plain text",
"Description": "Sensitive environment variables such as access tokens and keys should not be kept as plain text. It is recommended to use Github secrets, Hashicorp Vault or other secure credential storage and retrieval mechanisms, and add them as appropriate environment variables at runtime."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Prevent Pull Request to execute secret-enabled workflows",
"Description": "Workflows that use secrets should not be triggered on pull requests from forks, as these can be used to extract secrets. It is recommended to add a \"pull_request_target\" event instead of \"pull_request\" or limit triggers to \"push\" events only, if possible."
}
]

All recommendations are based on authoritative sources such as the CodeQL documentation (Github), the 12 Factor App Methodology (12 Factor App) and the Docker documentation (Docker).

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below.

Code Reviewer Model Name: beta

Code Comments

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

  • Upgrade CodeQL dependencies to latest version for better security.
  • Consider updating the query configuration to include custom queries if deemed necessary.
  • Consider adding a step to manually build compiled languages in case the Autobuild step fails.
  • None of the changes made in this patch seem to have any security implications.

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

  1. It is good practice to include a comment explaining the purpose of the code block, such as why the Sarif file is being uploaded and what value it provides to the team.
  2. Use a specific tag version for the codeql-action/upload-sarif step to prevent unexpected changes or compatibility issues.
  3. Consider adding a step to verify the integrity of the Sarif file before uploading, such as a checksum check, to ensure that the data is not corrupted or tampered with.

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.40%. Comparing base (bf2b016) to head (377c320).
⚠️ Report is 56 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #392 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.88% 68.40% -0.48% 
==========================================
Files 15 15 Lines 1671 1671 ==========================================
- Hits 1151 1143 -8 - Misses 399 409 +10 + Partials 121 119 -2 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from e81a29f to 1ef73a2CompareMay 7, 2023 18:51
Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](github/codeql-action@5f53256...29b1f65)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-major
...
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from 1ef73a2 to 377c320CompareMay 15, 2023 01:33
@dependabot@github

dependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 25, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Superseded by #402.

@dependabotdependabotBot closed this May 25, 2023
@dependabot
dependabotBot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch May 25, 2023 01:58
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependenciesPull requests that update a dependency filegithub_actionsPull requests that update Github_actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@codecov-commenter@step-security-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 by dependabot[bot] · Pull Request #392 · step-security/agent · GitHub
Skip to content

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 - #392

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3
Closed

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3#392
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabotdependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.

Changelog

Sourced from github/codeql-action's changelog.

CodeQL Action Changelog

[UNRELEASED]

No user facing changes.

2.3.3 - 04 May 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.1. #1664
  • You can now configure CodeQL within your code scanning workflow by passing a config input to the init Action. See Using a custom configuration file for more information about configuring code scanning. #1590

2.3.2 - 27 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.1 - 26 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.0 - 21 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.0. #1649
  • Bump the minimum CodeQL bundle version to 2.8.5. #1618

2.2.12 - 13 Apr 2023

  • Include the value of the GITHUB_RUN_ATTEMPT environment variable in the telemetry sent to GitHub. #1640
  • Improve the ease of debugging failed runs configured using default setup. The CodeQL Action will now upload diagnostic information to Code Scanning from failed runs configured using default setup. You can view this diagnostic information on the tool status page. #1619

2.2.11 - 06 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.2.10 - 05 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.6. #1629

2.2.9 - 27 Mar 2023

  • Customers post-processing the SARIF output of the analyze Action before uploading it to Code Scanning will benefit from an improved debugging experience. #1598
    • The CodeQL Action will now upload a SARIF file with debugging information to Code Scanning on failed runs for customers using upload: false. Previously, this was only available for customers using the default value of the upload input.
    • The upload input to the analyze Action now accepts the following values:
      • always is the default value, which uploads the SARIF file to Code Scanning for successful and failed runs.
      • failure-only is recommended for customers post-processing the SARIF file before uploading it to Code Scanning. This option uploads debugging information to Code Scanning for failed runs to improve the debugging experience.
      • never avoids uploading the SARIF file to Code Scanning even if the code scanning run fails. This is not recommended for external users since it complicates debugging.
      • The legacy true and false options will be interpreted as always and failure-only respectively.

2.2.8 - 22 Mar 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.5. #1585

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 29b1f65 Merge pull request #1669 from github/update-v2.3.3-318bcc7f8
  • 140500d Update changelog for v2.3.3
  • 318bcc7 Merge pull request #1664 from github/update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • f72bf5d Fix workflow formatting
  • 3346195 Merge branch 'main' into update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • 8ca5570 Merge pull request #1666 from github/aeisenberg/readme-update
  • b1b3d00 Add link to changenote for custom config
  • d2f6dfd Merge pull request #1665 from github/aeisenberg/config-param
  • cba5616 Update CHANGELOG.md
  • 40c9593 Add changelog note
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabotdependabotBot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code labels May 5, 2023

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below. As we have used multiple ways to analyze the diff, our bot will create multiple comments with code feedback

Code Reviewer Model Name: json_output

Code Comments

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Use of ambiguous comment",
"Description": "Change '# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.' to '# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub’s code scanning dashboard.' to be more specific."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
}
]

For the code change provided, I have identified the following:

  1. Severity Medium: Use of ambiguous comment. The comment "# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard." is not very specific and could lead to confusion. According to the book "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin, comments should be used to clarify code that is difficult to understand, but they should not be a substitute for clear code. The recommendation is to change the comment to something more specific like "# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.".

  2. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

  3. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Update Initialize, Autobuild and Analyze actions to latest version",
"Description": "The CodeQL tools for scanning and analysis should be kept up to date for better security and functionality. It is recommended to use the latest version of these actions."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Enable or add CodeQL tool cache",
"Description": "Caching CodeQL tools can significantly speed up your analysis and save resources. It is recommended to enable or add codeql tool cache to your workflow."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Avoid using sensitive environment variables as plain text",
"Description": "Sensitive environment variables such as access tokens and keys should not be kept as plain text. It is recommended to use Github secrets, Hashicorp Vault or other secure credential storage and retrieval mechanisms, and add them as appropriate environment variables at runtime."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Prevent Pull Request to execute secret-enabled workflows",
"Description": "Workflows that use secrets should not be triggered on pull requests from forks, as these can be used to extract secrets. It is recommended to add a \"pull_request_target\" event instead of \"pull_request\" or limit triggers to \"push\" events only, if possible."
}
]

All recommendations are based on authoritative sources such as the CodeQL documentation (Github), the 12 Factor App Methodology (12 Factor App) and the Docker documentation (Docker).

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below.

Code Reviewer Model Name: beta

Code Comments

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

  • Upgrade CodeQL dependencies to latest version for better security.
  • Consider updating the query configuration to include custom queries if deemed necessary.
  • Consider adding a step to manually build compiled languages in case the Autobuild step fails.
  • None of the changes made in this patch seem to have any security implications.

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

  1. It is good practice to include a comment explaining the purpose of the code block, such as why the Sarif file is being uploaded and what value it provides to the team.
  2. Use a specific tag version for the codeql-action/upload-sarif step to prevent unexpected changes or compatibility issues.
  3. Consider adding a step to verify the integrity of the Sarif file before uploading, such as a checksum check, to ensure that the data is not corrupted or tampered with.

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.40%. Comparing base (bf2b016) to head (377c320).
⚠️ Report is 56 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #392 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.88% 68.40% -0.48% 
==========================================
Files 15 15 Lines 1671 1671 ==========================================
- Hits 1151 1143 -8 - Misses 399 409 +10 + Partials 121 119 -2 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from e81a29f to 1ef73a2CompareMay 7, 2023 18:51
Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](github/codeql-action@5f53256...29b1f65)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-major
...
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from 1ef73a2 to 377c320CompareMay 15, 2023 01:33
@dependabot@github

dependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 25, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Superseded by #402.

@dependabotdependabotBot closed this May 25, 2023
@dependabot
dependabotBot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch May 25, 2023 01:58
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependenciesPull requests that update a dependency filegithub_actionsPull requests that update Github_actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@codecov-commenter@step-security-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 by dependabot[bot] · Pull Request #392 · step-security/agent · GitHub
Skip to content

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 - #392

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3
Closed

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3#392
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabotdependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.

Changelog

Sourced from github/codeql-action's changelog.

CodeQL Action Changelog

[UNRELEASED]

No user facing changes.

2.3.3 - 04 May 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.1. #1664
  • You can now configure CodeQL within your code scanning workflow by passing a config input to the init Action. See Using a custom configuration file for more information about configuring code scanning. #1590

2.3.2 - 27 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.1 - 26 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.0 - 21 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.0. #1649
  • Bump the minimum CodeQL bundle version to 2.8.5. #1618

2.2.12 - 13 Apr 2023

  • Include the value of the GITHUB_RUN_ATTEMPT environment variable in the telemetry sent to GitHub. #1640
  • Improve the ease of debugging failed runs configured using default setup. The CodeQL Action will now upload diagnostic information to Code Scanning from failed runs configured using default setup. You can view this diagnostic information on the tool status page. #1619

2.2.11 - 06 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.2.10 - 05 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.6. #1629

2.2.9 - 27 Mar 2023

  • Customers post-processing the SARIF output of the analyze Action before uploading it to Code Scanning will benefit from an improved debugging experience. #1598
    • The CodeQL Action will now upload a SARIF file with debugging information to Code Scanning on failed runs for customers using upload: false. Previously, this was only available for customers using the default value of the upload input.
    • The upload input to the analyze Action now accepts the following values:
      • always is the default value, which uploads the SARIF file to Code Scanning for successful and failed runs.
      • failure-only is recommended for customers post-processing the SARIF file before uploading it to Code Scanning. This option uploads debugging information to Code Scanning for failed runs to improve the debugging experience.
      • never avoids uploading the SARIF file to Code Scanning even if the code scanning run fails. This is not recommended for external users since it complicates debugging.
      • The legacy true and false options will be interpreted as always and failure-only respectively.

2.2.8 - 22 Mar 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.5. #1585

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 29b1f65 Merge pull request #1669 from github/update-v2.3.3-318bcc7f8
  • 140500d Update changelog for v2.3.3
  • 318bcc7 Merge pull request #1664 from github/update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • f72bf5d Fix workflow formatting
  • 3346195 Merge branch 'main' into update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • 8ca5570 Merge pull request #1666 from github/aeisenberg/readme-update
  • b1b3d00 Add link to changenote for custom config
  • d2f6dfd Merge pull request #1665 from github/aeisenberg/config-param
  • cba5616 Update CHANGELOG.md
  • 40c9593 Add changelog note
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabotdependabotBot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code labels May 5, 2023

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below. As we have used multiple ways to analyze the diff, our bot will create multiple comments with code feedback

Code Reviewer Model Name: json_output

Code Comments

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Use of ambiguous comment",
"Description": "Change '# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.' to '# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub’s code scanning dashboard.' to be more specific."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
}
]

For the code change provided, I have identified the following:

  1. Severity Medium: Use of ambiguous comment. The comment "# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard." is not very specific and could lead to confusion. According to the book "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin, comments should be used to clarify code that is difficult to understand, but they should not be a substitute for clear code. The recommendation is to change the comment to something more specific like "# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.".

  2. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

  3. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Update Initialize, Autobuild and Analyze actions to latest version",
"Description": "The CodeQL tools for scanning and analysis should be kept up to date for better security and functionality. It is recommended to use the latest version of these actions."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Enable or add CodeQL tool cache",
"Description": "Caching CodeQL tools can significantly speed up your analysis and save resources. It is recommended to enable or add codeql tool cache to your workflow."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Avoid using sensitive environment variables as plain text",
"Description": "Sensitive environment variables such as access tokens and keys should not be kept as plain text. It is recommended to use Github secrets, Hashicorp Vault or other secure credential storage and retrieval mechanisms, and add them as appropriate environment variables at runtime."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Prevent Pull Request to execute secret-enabled workflows",
"Description": "Workflows that use secrets should not be triggered on pull requests from forks, as these can be used to extract secrets. It is recommended to add a \"pull_request_target\" event instead of \"pull_request\" or limit triggers to \"push\" events only, if possible."
}
]

All recommendations are based on authoritative sources such as the CodeQL documentation (Github), the 12 Factor App Methodology (12 Factor App) and the Docker documentation (Docker).

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below.

Code Reviewer Model Name: beta

Code Comments

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

  • Upgrade CodeQL dependencies to latest version for better security.
  • Consider updating the query configuration to include custom queries if deemed necessary.
  • Consider adding a step to manually build compiled languages in case the Autobuild step fails.
  • None of the changes made in this patch seem to have any security implications.

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

  1. It is good practice to include a comment explaining the purpose of the code block, such as why the Sarif file is being uploaded and what value it provides to the team.
  2. Use a specific tag version for the codeql-action/upload-sarif step to prevent unexpected changes or compatibility issues.
  3. Consider adding a step to verify the integrity of the Sarif file before uploading, such as a checksum check, to ensure that the data is not corrupted or tampered with.

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.40%. Comparing base (bf2b016) to head (377c320).
⚠️ Report is 56 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #392 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.88% 68.40% -0.48% 
==========================================
Files 15 15 Lines 1671 1671 ==========================================
- Hits 1151 1143 -8 - Misses 399 409 +10 + Partials 121 119 -2 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from e81a29f to 1ef73a2CompareMay 7, 2023 18:51
Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](github/codeql-action@5f53256...29b1f65)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-major
...
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from 1ef73a2 to 377c320CompareMay 15, 2023 01:33
@dependabot@github

dependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 25, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Superseded by #402.

@dependabotdependabotBot closed this May 25, 2023
@dependabot
dependabotBot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch May 25, 2023 01:58
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependenciesPull requests that update a dependency filegithub_actionsPull requests that update Github_actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@codecov-commenter@step-security-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 by dependabot[bot] · Pull Request #392 · step-security/agent · GitHub
Skip to content

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 - #392

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3
Closed

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3#392
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabotdependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.

Changelog

Sourced from github/codeql-action's changelog.

CodeQL Action Changelog

[UNRELEASED]

No user facing changes.

2.3.3 - 04 May 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.1. #1664
  • You can now configure CodeQL within your code scanning workflow by passing a config input to the init Action. See Using a custom configuration file for more information about configuring code scanning. #1590

2.3.2 - 27 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.1 - 26 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.0 - 21 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.0. #1649
  • Bump the minimum CodeQL bundle version to 2.8.5. #1618

2.2.12 - 13 Apr 2023

  • Include the value of the GITHUB_RUN_ATTEMPT environment variable in the telemetry sent to GitHub. #1640
  • Improve the ease of debugging failed runs configured using default setup. The CodeQL Action will now upload diagnostic information to Code Scanning from failed runs configured using default setup. You can view this diagnostic information on the tool status page. #1619

2.2.11 - 06 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.2.10 - 05 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.6. #1629

2.2.9 - 27 Mar 2023

  • Customers post-processing the SARIF output of the analyze Action before uploading it to Code Scanning will benefit from an improved debugging experience. #1598
    • The CodeQL Action will now upload a SARIF file with debugging information to Code Scanning on failed runs for customers using upload: false. Previously, this was only available for customers using the default value of the upload input.
    • The upload input to the analyze Action now accepts the following values:
      • always is the default value, which uploads the SARIF file to Code Scanning for successful and failed runs.
      • failure-only is recommended for customers post-processing the SARIF file before uploading it to Code Scanning. This option uploads debugging information to Code Scanning for failed runs to improve the debugging experience.
      • never avoids uploading the SARIF file to Code Scanning even if the code scanning run fails. This is not recommended for external users since it complicates debugging.
      • The legacy true and false options will be interpreted as always and failure-only respectively.

2.2.8 - 22 Mar 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.5. #1585

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 29b1f65 Merge pull request #1669 from github/update-v2.3.3-318bcc7f8
  • 140500d Update changelog for v2.3.3
  • 318bcc7 Merge pull request #1664 from github/update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • f72bf5d Fix workflow formatting
  • 3346195 Merge branch 'main' into update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • 8ca5570 Merge pull request #1666 from github/aeisenberg/readme-update
  • b1b3d00 Add link to changenote for custom config
  • d2f6dfd Merge pull request #1665 from github/aeisenberg/config-param
  • cba5616 Update CHANGELOG.md
  • 40c9593 Add changelog note
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabotdependabotBot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code labels May 5, 2023

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below. As we have used multiple ways to analyze the diff, our bot will create multiple comments with code feedback

Code Reviewer Model Name: json_output

Code Comments

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Use of ambiguous comment",
"Description": "Change '# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.' to '# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub’s code scanning dashboard.' to be more specific."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
}
]

For the code change provided, I have identified the following:

  1. Severity Medium: Use of ambiguous comment. The comment "# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard." is not very specific and could lead to confusion. According to the book "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin, comments should be used to clarify code that is difficult to understand, but they should not be a substitute for clear code. The recommendation is to change the comment to something more specific like "# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.".

  2. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

  3. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Update Initialize, Autobuild and Analyze actions to latest version",
"Description": "The CodeQL tools for scanning and analysis should be kept up to date for better security and functionality. It is recommended to use the latest version of these actions."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Enable or add CodeQL tool cache",
"Description": "Caching CodeQL tools can significantly speed up your analysis and save resources. It is recommended to enable or add codeql tool cache to your workflow."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Avoid using sensitive environment variables as plain text",
"Description": "Sensitive environment variables such as access tokens and keys should not be kept as plain text. It is recommended to use Github secrets, Hashicorp Vault or other secure credential storage and retrieval mechanisms, and add them as appropriate environment variables at runtime."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Prevent Pull Request to execute secret-enabled workflows",
"Description": "Workflows that use secrets should not be triggered on pull requests from forks, as these can be used to extract secrets. It is recommended to add a \"pull_request_target\" event instead of \"pull_request\" or limit triggers to \"push\" events only, if possible."
}
]

All recommendations are based on authoritative sources such as the CodeQL documentation (Github), the 12 Factor App Methodology (12 Factor App) and the Docker documentation (Docker).

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below.

Code Reviewer Model Name: beta

Code Comments

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

  • Upgrade CodeQL dependencies to latest version for better security.
  • Consider updating the query configuration to include custom queries if deemed necessary.
  • Consider adding a step to manually build compiled languages in case the Autobuild step fails.
  • None of the changes made in this patch seem to have any security implications.

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

  1. It is good practice to include a comment explaining the purpose of the code block, such as why the Sarif file is being uploaded and what value it provides to the team.
  2. Use a specific tag version for the codeql-action/upload-sarif step to prevent unexpected changes or compatibility issues.
  3. Consider adding a step to verify the integrity of the Sarif file before uploading, such as a checksum check, to ensure that the data is not corrupted or tampered with.

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.40%. Comparing base (bf2b016) to head (377c320).
⚠️ Report is 56 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #392 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.88% 68.40% -0.48% 
==========================================
Files 15 15 Lines 1671 1671 ==========================================
- Hits 1151 1143 -8 - Misses 399 409 +10 + Partials 121 119 -2 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from e81a29f to 1ef73a2CompareMay 7, 2023 18:51
Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](github/codeql-action@5f53256...29b1f65)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-major
...
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from 1ef73a2 to 377c320CompareMay 15, 2023 01:33
@dependabot@github

dependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 25, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Superseded by #402.

@dependabotdependabotBot closed this May 25, 2023
@dependabot
dependabotBot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch May 25, 2023 01:58
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependenciesPull requests that update a dependency filegithub_actionsPull requests that update Github_actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@codecov-commenter@step-security-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 by dependabot[bot] · Pull Request #392 · step-security/agent · GitHub
Skip to content

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3 - #392

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3
Closed

Bump github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3#392
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabotdependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.

Changelog

Sourced from github/codeql-action's changelog.

CodeQL Action Changelog

[UNRELEASED]

No user facing changes.

2.3.3 - 04 May 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.1. #1664
  • You can now configure CodeQL within your code scanning workflow by passing a config input to the init Action. See Using a custom configuration file for more information about configuring code scanning. #1590

2.3.2 - 27 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.1 - 26 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.0 - 21 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.0. #1649
  • Bump the minimum CodeQL bundle version to 2.8.5. #1618

2.2.12 - 13 Apr 2023

  • Include the value of the GITHUB_RUN_ATTEMPT environment variable in the telemetry sent to GitHub. #1640
  • Improve the ease of debugging failed runs configured using default setup. The CodeQL Action will now upload diagnostic information to Code Scanning from failed runs configured using default setup. You can view this diagnostic information on the tool status page. #1619

2.2.11 - 06 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.2.10 - 05 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.6. #1629

2.2.9 - 27 Mar 2023

  • Customers post-processing the SARIF output of the analyze Action before uploading it to Code Scanning will benefit from an improved debugging experience. #1598
    • The CodeQL Action will now upload a SARIF file with debugging information to Code Scanning on failed runs for customers using upload: false. Previously, this was only available for customers using the default value of the upload input.
    • The upload input to the analyze Action now accepts the following values:
      • always is the default value, which uploads the SARIF file to Code Scanning for successful and failed runs.
      • failure-only is recommended for customers post-processing the SARIF file before uploading it to Code Scanning. This option uploads debugging information to Code Scanning for failed runs to improve the debugging experience.
      • never avoids uploading the SARIF file to Code Scanning even if the code scanning run fails. This is not recommended for external users since it complicates debugging.
      • The legacy true and false options will be interpreted as always and failure-only respectively.

2.2.8 - 22 Mar 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.5. #1585

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 29b1f65 Merge pull request #1669 from github/update-v2.3.3-318bcc7f8
  • 140500d Update changelog for v2.3.3
  • 318bcc7 Merge pull request #1664 from github/update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • f72bf5d Fix workflow formatting
  • 3346195 Merge branch 'main' into update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • 8ca5570 Merge pull request #1666 from github/aeisenberg/readme-update
  • b1b3d00 Add link to changenote for custom config
  • d2f6dfd Merge pull request #1665 from github/aeisenberg/config-param
  • cba5616 Update CHANGELOG.md
  • 40c9593 Add changelog note
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabotdependabotBot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code labels May 5, 2023

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below. As we have used multiple ways to analyze the diff, our bot will create multiple comments with code feedback

Code Reviewer Model Name: json_output

Code Comments

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Use of ambiguous comment",
"Description": "Change '# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.' to '# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub’s code scanning dashboard.' to be more specific."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
}
]

For the code change provided, I have identified the following:

  1. Severity Medium: Use of ambiguous comment. The comment "# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard." is not very specific and could lead to confusion. According to the book "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin, comments should be used to clarify code that is difficult to understand, but they should not be a substitute for clear code. The recommendation is to change the comment to something more specific like "# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.".

  2. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

  3. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Update Initialize, Autobuild and Analyze actions to latest version",
"Description": "The CodeQL tools for scanning and analysis should be kept up to date for better security and functionality. It is recommended to use the latest version of these actions."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "Enable or add CodeQL tool cache",
"Description": "Caching CodeQL tools can significantly speed up your analysis and save resources. It is recommended to enable or add codeql tool cache to your workflow."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Avoid using sensitive environment variables as plain text",
"Description": "Sensitive environment variables such as access tokens and keys should not be kept as plain text. It is recommended to use Github secrets, Hashicorp Vault or other secure credential storage and retrieval mechanisms, and add them as appropriate environment variables at runtime."
},
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Prevent Pull Request to execute secret-enabled workflows",
"Description": "Workflows that use secrets should not be triggered on pull requests from forks, as these can be used to extract secrets. It is recommended to add a \"pull_request_target\" event instead of \"pull_request\" or limit triggers to \"push\" events only, if possible."
}
]

All recommendations are based on authoritative sources such as the CodeQL documentation (Github), the 12 Factor App Methodology (12 Factor App) and the Docker documentation (Docker).

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@step-security-botstep-security-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below.

Code Reviewer Model Name: beta

Code Comments

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

  • Upgrade CodeQL dependencies to latest version for better security.
  • Consider updating the query configuration to include custom queries if deemed necessary.
  • Consider adding a step to manually build compiled languages in case the Autobuild step fails.
  • None of the changes made in this patch seem to have any security implications.

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

  1. It is good practice to include a comment explaining the purpose of the code block, such as why the Sarif file is being uploaded and what value it provides to the team.
  2. Use a specific tag version for the codeql-action/upload-sarif step to prevent unexpected changes or compatibility issues.
  3. Consider adding a step to verify the integrity of the Sarif file before uploading, such as a checksum check, to ensure that the data is not corrupted or tampered with.

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented May 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.40%. Comparing base (bf2b016) to head (377c320).
⚠️ Report is 56 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #392 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.88% 68.40% -0.48% 
==========================================
Files 15 15 Lines 1671 1671 ==========================================
- Hits 1151 1143 -8 - Misses 399 409 +10 + Partials 121 119 -2 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from e81a29f to 1ef73a2CompareMay 7, 2023 18:51
Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](github/codeql-action@5f53256...29b1f65)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-major
...
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot
dependabotBotforce-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from 1ef73a2 to 377c320CompareMay 15, 2023 01:33
@dependabot@github

dependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMay 25, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Superseded by #402.

@dependabotdependabotBot closed this May 25, 2023
@dependabot
dependabotBot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch May 25, 2023 01:58
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependenciesPull requests that update a dependency filegithub_actionsPull requests that update Github_actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@codecov-commenter@step-security-bot