Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
example: use the new middleware registration - #73
Merged
Conversation
Rework the example generator to use `server/middleware.json` for registering static file middleware.
6 tasks
raymondfeng
commented
Dec 2, 2014
Member
LGTM |
bajtos
commented
Dec 2, 2014
MemberAuthor
I'll wait with merging until a new version of loopback-workspace is released. |
bajtos
commented
Dec 2, 2014
MemberAuthor
@slnode test please |
bajtos added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2014
…middleware-config example: use the new middleware registration
rmg
commented
Dec 11, 2014
Member
This seems to have removed the route for /. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rework the example generator to use
server/middleware.jsonfor registering static file middleware.A part of strongloop/loopback-workspace#167
/to @raymondfeng please review