Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Warn about injectOptionsFromRemoteContext - #3080
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The option injectOptionsFromRemoteContext was added to LoopBack 2.x only and is not available in LoopBack 3.x (and newer). When a model with this option is encountered, we are printing a warning message now, to let the user know about this change between 2.x and 3.x.
bajtos
commented
Jan 9, 2017
MemberAuthor
The current message: |
superkhau
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2017
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The option injectOptionsFromRemoteContext was added to LoopBack 2.x only and is not available in LoopBack 3.x (and newer).
When a model with this option is encountered, we are printing a warning message now, to let the user know about this change between 2.x and 3.x.
Connect to #1495, see also #3048 which implemented the flag in 2.x
@superkhau PTAL
@crandmck could you please review the message?