Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
fix(api): accept offset timestamps - #6117
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:443d4d81bb
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:4219c91105
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubCodex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback". |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:6eb728877d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
7ttp
commented
Aug 7, 2026
@codex review |
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubCodex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback". |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
…e link (#370) Revierte el pin a 2.111.0 introducido en #363. La regresion de v2.112.0 (supabase link fallaba con SchemaError sobre inserted_at de la 3a API key) se arreglo upstream: supabase/cli#6115 cerro como completed el 2026-08-08 via PR supabase/cli#6117 "fix(api): accept offset timestamps", y v2.113.0 estable salio 30 minutos despues con el fix incluido. La verificacion E2E es el propio Build and Deploy de este merge: corre `supabase link` con latest contra el proyecto real (3+ API keys, el trigger exacto del bug). Si volviera a fallar, re-pinnear a 2.111.0. Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
TL;DR
fixes
supabase linkandsupabase branches listfailing against every project, which was caused by the generated response schemas inheriting the OpenAPI spec's Z-anchoreddate-timepatterns while the Management API serializes timestamps with a numeric UTC offset, and isnow pragmatically fixed by dropping that pattern during code generation so
date-timestrings keep only theirformatannotation. Timestamps are no longer pattern checked at decode time, matching the contract that shipped before the spec added patterns...ref: