[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference - #2

Open
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues
Open

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference#2
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues

Conversation

@fallchildren

@fallchildrenfallchildren commented Aug 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following steps should illustrate the problem:

  1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
  2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
  3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
  4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
    and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=

To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.

The issue was found when investigating https://www.swgemu.com/bugs/view.php?id=8229
A reordering fix for the Mantis bug is also on the swgemu gerrit instance see https://review.swgemu.com/c/Core3/+/8940

@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 896d66a to 32449f4CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:49
The following steps should illustrate the problem:
1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=
To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.
@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 32449f4 to 1031682CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:50
@fallchildren

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Reworked the logic to make it more clear and all cases are handled and no unnecessary call to getReferenceUnsafeNoReload is done .

swgemu2deploy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@fallchildren
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference - #2

Open
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues
Open

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference#2
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues

Conversation

@fallchildren

@fallchildrenfallchildren commented Aug 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following steps should illustrate the problem:

  1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
  2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
  3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
  4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
    and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=

To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.

The issue was found when investigating https://www.swgemu.com/bugs/view.php?id=8229
A reordering fix for the Mantis bug is also on the swgemu gerrit instance see https://review.swgemu.com/c/Core3/+/8940

@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 896d66a to 32449f4CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:49
The following steps should illustrate the problem:
1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=
To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.
@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 32449f4 to 1031682CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:50
@fallchildren

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Reworked the logic to make it more clear and all cases are handled and no unnecessary call to getReferenceUnsafeNoReload is done .

swgemu2deploy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@fallchildren
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference - #2

Open
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues
Open

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference#2
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues

Conversation

@fallchildren

@fallchildrenfallchildren commented Aug 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following steps should illustrate the problem:

  1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
  2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
  3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
  4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
    and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=

To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.

The issue was found when investigating https://www.swgemu.com/bugs/view.php?id=8229
A reordering fix for the Mantis bug is also on the swgemu gerrit instance see https://review.swgemu.com/c/Core3/+/8940

@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 896d66a to 32449f4CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:49
The following steps should illustrate the problem:
1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=
To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.
@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 32449f4 to 1031682CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:50
@fallchildren

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Reworked the logic to make it more clear and all cases are handled and no unnecessary call to getReferenceUnsafeNoReload is done .

swgemu2deploy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@fallchildren
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference - #2

Open
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues
Open

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference#2
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues

Conversation

@fallchildren

@fallchildrenfallchildren commented Aug 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following steps should illustrate the problem:

  1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
  2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
  3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
  4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
    and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=

To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.

The issue was found when investigating https://www.swgemu.com/bugs/view.php?id=8229
A reordering fix for the Mantis bug is also on the swgemu gerrit instance see https://review.swgemu.com/c/Core3/+/8940

@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 896d66a to 32449f4CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:49
The following steps should illustrate the problem:
1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=
To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.
@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 32449f4 to 1031682CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:50
@fallchildren

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Reworked the logic to make it more clear and all cases are handled and no unnecessary call to getReferenceUnsafeNoReload is done .

swgemu2deploy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@fallchildren
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference - #2

Open
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues
Open

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference#2
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues

Conversation

@fallchildren

@fallchildrenfallchildren commented Aug 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following steps should illustrate the problem:

  1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
  2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
  3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
  4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
    and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=

To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.

The issue was found when investigating https://www.swgemu.com/bugs/view.php?id=8229
A reordering fix for the Mantis bug is also on the swgemu gerrit instance see https://review.swgemu.com/c/Core3/+/8940

@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 896d66a to 32449f4CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:49
The following steps should illustrate the problem:
1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=
To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.
@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 32449f4 to 1031682CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:50
@fallchildren

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Reworked the logic to make it more clear and all cases are handled and no unnecessary call to getReferenceUnsafeNoReload is done .

swgemu2deploy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@fallchildren
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference - #2

Open
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues
Open

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference#2
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues

Conversation

@fallchildren

@fallchildrenfallchildren commented Aug 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following steps should illustrate the problem:

  1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
  2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
  3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
  4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
    and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=

To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.

The issue was found when investigating https://www.swgemu.com/bugs/view.php?id=8229
A reordering fix for the Mantis bug is also on the swgemu gerrit instance see https://review.swgemu.com/c/Core3/+/8940

@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 896d66a to 32449f4CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:49
The following steps should illustrate the problem:
1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=
To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.
@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 32449f4 to 1031682CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:50
@fallchildren

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Reworked the logic to make it more clear and all cases are handled and no unnecessary call to getReferenceUnsafeNoReload is done .

swgemu2deploy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@fallchildren
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference - #2

Open
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues
Open

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference#2
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues

Conversation

@fallchildren

@fallchildrenfallchildren commented Aug 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following steps should illustrate the problem:

  1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
  2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
  3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
  4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
    and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=

To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.

The issue was found when investigating https://www.swgemu.com/bugs/view.php?id=8229
A reordering fix for the Mantis bug is also on the swgemu gerrit instance see https://review.swgemu.com/c/Core3/+/8940

@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 896d66a to 32449f4CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:49
The following steps should illustrate the problem:
1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=
To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.
@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 32449f4 to 1031682CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:50
@fallchildren

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Reworked the logic to make it more clear and all cases are handled and no unnecessary call to getReferenceUnsafeNoReload is done .

swgemu2deploy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@fallchildren
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference - #2

Open
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues
Open

[fixed] fix pitfall when using == and != with MangedWeakReference#2
fallchildren wants to merge 1 commit into
swgemu:masterfrom
fallchildren:managedweakref_compare_issues

Conversation

@fallchildren

@fallchildrenfallchildren commented Aug 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following steps should illustrate the problem:

  1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
  2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
  3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
  4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
    and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=

To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.

The issue was found when investigating https://www.swgemu.com/bugs/view.php?id=8229
A reordering fix for the Mantis bug is also on the swgemu gerrit instance see https://review.swgemu.com/c/Core3/+/8940

@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 896d66a to 32449f4CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:49
The following steps should illustrate the problem:
1. Object A is freshly constructed and gets an _objectID of 0.
2. ManagedWeakReference of A is created -> savedObjectID will be also 0
3. ObjectManager::persist is called and A gets a validi _objectID
4. ManagedWeakReference of A will still have the savedObjectID of 0
and will result in wrong behaviour of == and !=
To circumvent these this commit changes the case when one of the
compared ManagedWeakReference instances has a savedObjectID of 0 and
checks the actual reference object for the real _objectID.
@fallchildren
fallchildrenforce-pushed the managedweakref_compare_issues branch from 32449f4 to 1031682CompareAugust 25, 2022 16:50
@fallchildren

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Reworked the logic to make it more clear and all cases are handled and no unnecessary call to getReferenceUnsafeNoReload is done .

swgemu2deploy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@fallchildren