fix: send hardware payment proofs - #1199

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android
Open

fix: send hardware payment proofs#1199
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends Paykit payment proofs for on-chain payment requests paid from a hardware wallet. It is stacked on #1178 so the proof-delivery changes remain isolated from the subscription work.

Description

  • Prepares the payment proof immediately before hardware broadcast, after signing succeeds.
  • Preserves the existing private Payment List consumption and request acceptance order.
  • Completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Keeps preparation idempotent across hardware broadcast retries.

Preview

N/A

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. Incoming on-chain Payment Request → choose a hardware wallet → review → sign and broadcast: payment succeeds and the requester receives its transaction proof.
  • 2.regression: hardware broadcast retry → retry the same signed transaction: the request is not accepted twice and the private Payment List is not consumed twice.

Automated Checks

  • AppViewModelSendFlowTest.kt: verifies hardware proof preparation ordering and idempotency, plus proof completion with the broadcast transaction ID.
  • ./gradlew testDevDebugUnitTest --tests 'to.bitkit.viewmodels.AppViewModelSendFlowTest'

@greptile-apps

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary

This PR extends incoming on-chain Paykit payment proofs to hardware-wallet sends while preserving preparation idempotency and the existing request-consumption order.

  • Prepares the proof immediately before broadcasting a signed hardware transaction.
  • Completes the proof with the resulting transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Adds focused tests for preparation ordering, retries, and proof completion.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge based on the reviewed hardware-send and payment-proof paths.

The hardware flow prepares the proof before broadcast, retains existing contact-payment preparation safeguards, completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID, and handles repository failures without interrupting payment-success navigation.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.ktAdds idempotent hardware proof preparation and transaction-ID-based proof completion without an accepted correctness issue.
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.ktCompletes the hardware payment proof before advancing the successful broadcast flow.
app/src/test/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModelSendFlowTest.ktVerifies proof preparation ordering, repeated preparation behavior, and completion with the broadcast transaction ID.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant H as Hardware send
participant A as AppViewModel
participant P as Paykit proof repository
participant W as Hardware wallet
U->>H: Confirm hardware payment
H->>W: Sign transaction
W-->>H: Signed transaction
H->>A: prepareHardwareContactPayment()
A->>P: Prepare payment proof
A->>A: Consume private list and accept request
A-->>H: Preparation succeeded
H->>H: Broadcast signed transaction
H-->>A: Transaction ID
A->>P: Complete proof with transaction ID
A->>A: Show payment success
Loading

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "fix: send hardware payment proofs" | Re-trigger Greptile

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 48f0d0a to 82d6c73CompareAugust 31, 2026 17:49
@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2026
13 tasks

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 82d6c73 to e1053b0CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:48
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e9ce645 to ad132c8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:54
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from 850c252 to bac8656CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:06
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from f08381d to 1eee260CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from bac8656 to 6bb8501CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from 1eee260 to e819704CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 6bb8501 to 7a6646cCompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e819704 to f17eff8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:37
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 7a6646c to a92ca77CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:38
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch 4 times, most recently from c72a4c3 to 10ff0dfCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:08
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from a92ca77 to af462caCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:17
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 1, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android to masterSeptember 2, 2026 10:16
@jvsena42
jvsena42 dismissed ovitrif’s stale reviewSeptember 2, 2026 10:16

The base branch was changed.

@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Starting review

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from af462ca to 1d50070CompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:22
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from d0bf6c2 to e84d74aCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:46
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from e84d74a to 35c0b4cCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:56
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 2, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 16c7158 to 1769cb2CompareSeptember 2, 2026 17:18
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up: current signed head is 1769cb2. The first CI run compiled the production code and ran 2,290 tests; its only failure was the new assertion mixing one raw endpoint with Mockito matchers. That assertion now uses eq(endpoint), static analysis remains clean for all changed files, and fresh CI is running.

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ben-kaufman@jvsena42@ovitrif
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix: send hardware payment proofs - #1199

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android
Open

fix: send hardware payment proofs#1199
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends Paykit payment proofs for on-chain payment requests paid from a hardware wallet. It is stacked on #1178 so the proof-delivery changes remain isolated from the subscription work.

Description

  • Prepares the payment proof immediately before hardware broadcast, after signing succeeds.
  • Preserves the existing private Payment List consumption and request acceptance order.
  • Completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Keeps preparation idempotent across hardware broadcast retries.

Preview

N/A

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. Incoming on-chain Payment Request → choose a hardware wallet → review → sign and broadcast: payment succeeds and the requester receives its transaction proof.
  • 2.regression: hardware broadcast retry → retry the same signed transaction: the request is not accepted twice and the private Payment List is not consumed twice.

Automated Checks

  • AppViewModelSendFlowTest.kt: verifies hardware proof preparation ordering and idempotency, plus proof completion with the broadcast transaction ID.
  • ./gradlew testDevDebugUnitTest --tests 'to.bitkit.viewmodels.AppViewModelSendFlowTest'

@greptile-apps

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary

This PR extends incoming on-chain Paykit payment proofs to hardware-wallet sends while preserving preparation idempotency and the existing request-consumption order.

  • Prepares the proof immediately before broadcasting a signed hardware transaction.
  • Completes the proof with the resulting transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Adds focused tests for preparation ordering, retries, and proof completion.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge based on the reviewed hardware-send and payment-proof paths.

The hardware flow prepares the proof before broadcast, retains existing contact-payment preparation safeguards, completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID, and handles repository failures without interrupting payment-success navigation.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.ktAdds idempotent hardware proof preparation and transaction-ID-based proof completion without an accepted correctness issue.
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.ktCompletes the hardware payment proof before advancing the successful broadcast flow.
app/src/test/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModelSendFlowTest.ktVerifies proof preparation ordering, repeated preparation behavior, and completion with the broadcast transaction ID.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant H as Hardware send
participant A as AppViewModel
participant P as Paykit proof repository
participant W as Hardware wallet
U->>H: Confirm hardware payment
H->>W: Sign transaction
W-->>H: Signed transaction
H->>A: prepareHardwareContactPayment()
A->>P: Prepare payment proof
A->>A: Consume private list and accept request
A-->>H: Preparation succeeded
H->>H: Broadcast signed transaction
H-->>A: Transaction ID
A->>P: Complete proof with transaction ID
A->>A: Show payment success
Loading

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "fix: send hardware payment proofs" | Re-trigger Greptile

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 48f0d0a to 82d6c73CompareAugust 31, 2026 17:49
@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2026
13 tasks

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 82d6c73 to e1053b0CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:48
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e9ce645 to ad132c8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:54
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from 850c252 to bac8656CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:06
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from f08381d to 1eee260CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from bac8656 to 6bb8501CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from 1eee260 to e819704CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 6bb8501 to 7a6646cCompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e819704 to f17eff8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:37
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 7a6646c to a92ca77CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:38
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch 4 times, most recently from c72a4c3 to 10ff0dfCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:08
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from a92ca77 to af462caCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:17
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 1, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android to masterSeptember 2, 2026 10:16
@jvsena42
jvsena42 dismissed ovitrif’s stale reviewSeptember 2, 2026 10:16

The base branch was changed.

@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Starting review

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from af462ca to 1d50070CompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:22
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from d0bf6c2 to e84d74aCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:46
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from e84d74a to 35c0b4cCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:56
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 2, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 16c7158 to 1769cb2CompareSeptember 2, 2026 17:18
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up: current signed head is 1769cb2. The first CI run compiled the production code and ran 2,290 tests; its only failure was the new assertion mixing one raw endpoint with Mockito matchers. That assertion now uses eq(endpoint), static analysis remains clean for all changed files, and fresh CI is running.

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ben-kaufman@jvsena42@ovitrif
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix: send hardware payment proofs - #1199

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android
Open

fix: send hardware payment proofs#1199
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends Paykit payment proofs for on-chain payment requests paid from a hardware wallet. It is stacked on #1178 so the proof-delivery changes remain isolated from the subscription work.

Description

  • Prepares the payment proof immediately before hardware broadcast, after signing succeeds.
  • Preserves the existing private Payment List consumption and request acceptance order.
  • Completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Keeps preparation idempotent across hardware broadcast retries.

Preview

N/A

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. Incoming on-chain Payment Request → choose a hardware wallet → review → sign and broadcast: payment succeeds and the requester receives its transaction proof.
  • 2.regression: hardware broadcast retry → retry the same signed transaction: the request is not accepted twice and the private Payment List is not consumed twice.

Automated Checks

  • AppViewModelSendFlowTest.kt: verifies hardware proof preparation ordering and idempotency, plus proof completion with the broadcast transaction ID.
  • ./gradlew testDevDebugUnitTest --tests 'to.bitkit.viewmodels.AppViewModelSendFlowTest'

@greptile-apps

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary

This PR extends incoming on-chain Paykit payment proofs to hardware-wallet sends while preserving preparation idempotency and the existing request-consumption order.

  • Prepares the proof immediately before broadcasting a signed hardware transaction.
  • Completes the proof with the resulting transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Adds focused tests for preparation ordering, retries, and proof completion.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge based on the reviewed hardware-send and payment-proof paths.

The hardware flow prepares the proof before broadcast, retains existing contact-payment preparation safeguards, completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID, and handles repository failures without interrupting payment-success navigation.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.ktAdds idempotent hardware proof preparation and transaction-ID-based proof completion without an accepted correctness issue.
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.ktCompletes the hardware payment proof before advancing the successful broadcast flow.
app/src/test/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModelSendFlowTest.ktVerifies proof preparation ordering, repeated preparation behavior, and completion with the broadcast transaction ID.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant H as Hardware send
participant A as AppViewModel
participant P as Paykit proof repository
participant W as Hardware wallet
U->>H: Confirm hardware payment
H->>W: Sign transaction
W-->>H: Signed transaction
H->>A: prepareHardwareContactPayment()
A->>P: Prepare payment proof
A->>A: Consume private list and accept request
A-->>H: Preparation succeeded
H->>H: Broadcast signed transaction
H-->>A: Transaction ID
A->>P: Complete proof with transaction ID
A->>A: Show payment success
Loading

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "fix: send hardware payment proofs" | Re-trigger Greptile

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 48f0d0a to 82d6c73CompareAugust 31, 2026 17:49
@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2026
13 tasks

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 82d6c73 to e1053b0CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:48
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e9ce645 to ad132c8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:54
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from 850c252 to bac8656CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:06
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from f08381d to 1eee260CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from bac8656 to 6bb8501CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from 1eee260 to e819704CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 6bb8501 to 7a6646cCompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e819704 to f17eff8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:37
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 7a6646c to a92ca77CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:38
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch 4 times, most recently from c72a4c3 to 10ff0dfCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:08
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from a92ca77 to af462caCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:17
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 1, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android to masterSeptember 2, 2026 10:16
@jvsena42
jvsena42 dismissed ovitrif’s stale reviewSeptember 2, 2026 10:16

The base branch was changed.

@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Starting review

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from af462ca to 1d50070CompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:22
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from d0bf6c2 to e84d74aCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:46
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from e84d74a to 35c0b4cCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:56
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 2, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 16c7158 to 1769cb2CompareSeptember 2, 2026 17:18
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up: current signed head is 1769cb2. The first CI run compiled the production code and ran 2,290 tests; its only failure was the new assertion mixing one raw endpoint with Mockito matchers. That assertion now uses eq(endpoint), static analysis remains clean for all changed files, and fresh CI is running.

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ben-kaufman@jvsena42@ovitrif
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix: send hardware payment proofs - #1199

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android
Open

fix: send hardware payment proofs#1199
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends Paykit payment proofs for on-chain payment requests paid from a hardware wallet. It is stacked on #1178 so the proof-delivery changes remain isolated from the subscription work.

Description

  • Prepares the payment proof immediately before hardware broadcast, after signing succeeds.
  • Preserves the existing private Payment List consumption and request acceptance order.
  • Completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Keeps preparation idempotent across hardware broadcast retries.

Preview

N/A

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. Incoming on-chain Payment Request → choose a hardware wallet → review → sign and broadcast: payment succeeds and the requester receives its transaction proof.
  • 2.regression: hardware broadcast retry → retry the same signed transaction: the request is not accepted twice and the private Payment List is not consumed twice.

Automated Checks

  • AppViewModelSendFlowTest.kt: verifies hardware proof preparation ordering and idempotency, plus proof completion with the broadcast transaction ID.
  • ./gradlew testDevDebugUnitTest --tests 'to.bitkit.viewmodels.AppViewModelSendFlowTest'

@greptile-apps

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary

This PR extends incoming on-chain Paykit payment proofs to hardware-wallet sends while preserving preparation idempotency and the existing request-consumption order.

  • Prepares the proof immediately before broadcasting a signed hardware transaction.
  • Completes the proof with the resulting transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Adds focused tests for preparation ordering, retries, and proof completion.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge based on the reviewed hardware-send and payment-proof paths.

The hardware flow prepares the proof before broadcast, retains existing contact-payment preparation safeguards, completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID, and handles repository failures without interrupting payment-success navigation.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.ktAdds idempotent hardware proof preparation and transaction-ID-based proof completion without an accepted correctness issue.
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.ktCompletes the hardware payment proof before advancing the successful broadcast flow.
app/src/test/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModelSendFlowTest.ktVerifies proof preparation ordering, repeated preparation behavior, and completion with the broadcast transaction ID.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant H as Hardware send
participant A as AppViewModel
participant P as Paykit proof repository
participant W as Hardware wallet
U->>H: Confirm hardware payment
H->>W: Sign transaction
W-->>H: Signed transaction
H->>A: prepareHardwareContactPayment()
A->>P: Prepare payment proof
A->>A: Consume private list and accept request
A-->>H: Preparation succeeded
H->>H: Broadcast signed transaction
H-->>A: Transaction ID
A->>P: Complete proof with transaction ID
A->>A: Show payment success
Loading

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "fix: send hardware payment proofs" | Re-trigger Greptile

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 48f0d0a to 82d6c73CompareAugust 31, 2026 17:49
@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2026
13 tasks

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 82d6c73 to e1053b0CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:48
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e9ce645 to ad132c8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:54
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from 850c252 to bac8656CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:06
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from f08381d to 1eee260CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from bac8656 to 6bb8501CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from 1eee260 to e819704CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 6bb8501 to 7a6646cCompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e819704 to f17eff8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:37
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 7a6646c to a92ca77CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:38
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch 4 times, most recently from c72a4c3 to 10ff0dfCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:08
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from a92ca77 to af462caCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:17
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 1, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android to masterSeptember 2, 2026 10:16
@jvsena42
jvsena42 dismissed ovitrif’s stale reviewSeptember 2, 2026 10:16

The base branch was changed.

@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Starting review

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from af462ca to 1d50070CompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:22
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from d0bf6c2 to e84d74aCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:46
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from e84d74a to 35c0b4cCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:56
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 2, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 16c7158 to 1769cb2CompareSeptember 2, 2026 17:18
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up: current signed head is 1769cb2. The first CI run compiled the production code and ran 2,290 tests; its only failure was the new assertion mixing one raw endpoint with Mockito matchers. That assertion now uses eq(endpoint), static analysis remains clean for all changed files, and fresh CI is running.

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ben-kaufman@jvsena42@ovitrif
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix: send hardware payment proofs - #1199

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android
Open

fix: send hardware payment proofs#1199
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends Paykit payment proofs for on-chain payment requests paid from a hardware wallet. It is stacked on #1178 so the proof-delivery changes remain isolated from the subscription work.

Description

  • Prepares the payment proof immediately before hardware broadcast, after signing succeeds.
  • Preserves the existing private Payment List consumption and request acceptance order.
  • Completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Keeps preparation idempotent across hardware broadcast retries.

Preview

N/A

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. Incoming on-chain Payment Request → choose a hardware wallet → review → sign and broadcast: payment succeeds and the requester receives its transaction proof.
  • 2.regression: hardware broadcast retry → retry the same signed transaction: the request is not accepted twice and the private Payment List is not consumed twice.

Automated Checks

  • AppViewModelSendFlowTest.kt: verifies hardware proof preparation ordering and idempotency, plus proof completion with the broadcast transaction ID.
  • ./gradlew testDevDebugUnitTest --tests 'to.bitkit.viewmodels.AppViewModelSendFlowTest'

@greptile-apps

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary

This PR extends incoming on-chain Paykit payment proofs to hardware-wallet sends while preserving preparation idempotency and the existing request-consumption order.

  • Prepares the proof immediately before broadcasting a signed hardware transaction.
  • Completes the proof with the resulting transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Adds focused tests for preparation ordering, retries, and proof completion.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge based on the reviewed hardware-send and payment-proof paths.

The hardware flow prepares the proof before broadcast, retains existing contact-payment preparation safeguards, completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID, and handles repository failures without interrupting payment-success navigation.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.ktAdds idempotent hardware proof preparation and transaction-ID-based proof completion without an accepted correctness issue.
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.ktCompletes the hardware payment proof before advancing the successful broadcast flow.
app/src/test/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModelSendFlowTest.ktVerifies proof preparation ordering, repeated preparation behavior, and completion with the broadcast transaction ID.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant H as Hardware send
participant A as AppViewModel
participant P as Paykit proof repository
participant W as Hardware wallet
U->>H: Confirm hardware payment
H->>W: Sign transaction
W-->>H: Signed transaction
H->>A: prepareHardwareContactPayment()
A->>P: Prepare payment proof
A->>A: Consume private list and accept request
A-->>H: Preparation succeeded
H->>H: Broadcast signed transaction
H-->>A: Transaction ID
A->>P: Complete proof with transaction ID
A->>A: Show payment success
Loading

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "fix: send hardware payment proofs" | Re-trigger Greptile

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 48f0d0a to 82d6c73CompareAugust 31, 2026 17:49
@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2026
13 tasks

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 82d6c73 to e1053b0CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:48
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e9ce645 to ad132c8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:54
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from 850c252 to bac8656CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:06
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from f08381d to 1eee260CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from bac8656 to 6bb8501CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from 1eee260 to e819704CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 6bb8501 to 7a6646cCompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e819704 to f17eff8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:37
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 7a6646c to a92ca77CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:38
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch 4 times, most recently from c72a4c3 to 10ff0dfCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:08
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from a92ca77 to af462caCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:17
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 1, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android to masterSeptember 2, 2026 10:16
@jvsena42
jvsena42 dismissed ovitrif’s stale reviewSeptember 2, 2026 10:16

The base branch was changed.

@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Starting review

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from af462ca to 1d50070CompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:22
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from d0bf6c2 to e84d74aCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:46
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from e84d74a to 35c0b4cCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:56
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 2, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 16c7158 to 1769cb2CompareSeptember 2, 2026 17:18
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up: current signed head is 1769cb2. The first CI run compiled the production code and ran 2,290 tests; its only failure was the new assertion mixing one raw endpoint with Mockito matchers. That assertion now uses eq(endpoint), static analysis remains clean for all changed files, and fresh CI is running.

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ben-kaufman@jvsena42@ovitrif
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix: send hardware payment proofs - #1199

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android
Open

fix: send hardware payment proofs#1199
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends Paykit payment proofs for on-chain payment requests paid from a hardware wallet. It is stacked on #1178 so the proof-delivery changes remain isolated from the subscription work.

Description

  • Prepares the payment proof immediately before hardware broadcast, after signing succeeds.
  • Preserves the existing private Payment List consumption and request acceptance order.
  • Completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Keeps preparation idempotent across hardware broadcast retries.

Preview

N/A

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. Incoming on-chain Payment Request → choose a hardware wallet → review → sign and broadcast: payment succeeds and the requester receives its transaction proof.
  • 2.regression: hardware broadcast retry → retry the same signed transaction: the request is not accepted twice and the private Payment List is not consumed twice.

Automated Checks

  • AppViewModelSendFlowTest.kt: verifies hardware proof preparation ordering and idempotency, plus proof completion with the broadcast transaction ID.
  • ./gradlew testDevDebugUnitTest --tests 'to.bitkit.viewmodels.AppViewModelSendFlowTest'

@greptile-apps

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary

This PR extends incoming on-chain Paykit payment proofs to hardware-wallet sends while preserving preparation idempotency and the existing request-consumption order.

  • Prepares the proof immediately before broadcasting a signed hardware transaction.
  • Completes the proof with the resulting transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Adds focused tests for preparation ordering, retries, and proof completion.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge based on the reviewed hardware-send and payment-proof paths.

The hardware flow prepares the proof before broadcast, retains existing contact-payment preparation safeguards, completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID, and handles repository failures without interrupting payment-success navigation.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.ktAdds idempotent hardware proof preparation and transaction-ID-based proof completion without an accepted correctness issue.
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.ktCompletes the hardware payment proof before advancing the successful broadcast flow.
app/src/test/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModelSendFlowTest.ktVerifies proof preparation ordering, repeated preparation behavior, and completion with the broadcast transaction ID.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant H as Hardware send
participant A as AppViewModel
participant P as Paykit proof repository
participant W as Hardware wallet
U->>H: Confirm hardware payment
H->>W: Sign transaction
W-->>H: Signed transaction
H->>A: prepareHardwareContactPayment()
A->>P: Prepare payment proof
A->>A: Consume private list and accept request
A-->>H: Preparation succeeded
H->>H: Broadcast signed transaction
H-->>A: Transaction ID
A->>P: Complete proof with transaction ID
A->>A: Show payment success
Loading

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "fix: send hardware payment proofs" | Re-trigger Greptile

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 48f0d0a to 82d6c73CompareAugust 31, 2026 17:49
@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2026
13 tasks

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 82d6c73 to e1053b0CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:48
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e9ce645 to ad132c8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:54
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from 850c252 to bac8656CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:06
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from f08381d to 1eee260CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from bac8656 to 6bb8501CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from 1eee260 to e819704CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 6bb8501 to 7a6646cCompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e819704 to f17eff8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:37
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 7a6646c to a92ca77CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:38
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch 4 times, most recently from c72a4c3 to 10ff0dfCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:08
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from a92ca77 to af462caCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:17
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 1, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android to masterSeptember 2, 2026 10:16
@jvsena42
jvsena42 dismissed ovitrif’s stale reviewSeptember 2, 2026 10:16

The base branch was changed.

@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Starting review

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from af462ca to 1d50070CompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:22
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from d0bf6c2 to e84d74aCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:46
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from e84d74a to 35c0b4cCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:56
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 2, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 16c7158 to 1769cb2CompareSeptember 2, 2026 17:18
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up: current signed head is 1769cb2. The first CI run compiled the production code and ran 2,290 tests; its only failure was the new assertion mixing one raw endpoint with Mockito matchers. That assertion now uses eq(endpoint), static analysis remains clean for all changed files, and fresh CI is running.

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ben-kaufman@jvsena42@ovitrif
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix: send hardware payment proofs - #1199

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android
Open

fix: send hardware payment proofs#1199
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends Paykit payment proofs for on-chain payment requests paid from a hardware wallet. It is stacked on #1178 so the proof-delivery changes remain isolated from the subscription work.

Description

  • Prepares the payment proof immediately before hardware broadcast, after signing succeeds.
  • Preserves the existing private Payment List consumption and request acceptance order.
  • Completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Keeps preparation idempotent across hardware broadcast retries.

Preview

N/A

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. Incoming on-chain Payment Request → choose a hardware wallet → review → sign and broadcast: payment succeeds and the requester receives its transaction proof.
  • 2.regression: hardware broadcast retry → retry the same signed transaction: the request is not accepted twice and the private Payment List is not consumed twice.

Automated Checks

  • AppViewModelSendFlowTest.kt: verifies hardware proof preparation ordering and idempotency, plus proof completion with the broadcast transaction ID.
  • ./gradlew testDevDebugUnitTest --tests 'to.bitkit.viewmodels.AppViewModelSendFlowTest'

@greptile-apps

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary

This PR extends incoming on-chain Paykit payment proofs to hardware-wallet sends while preserving preparation idempotency and the existing request-consumption order.

  • Prepares the proof immediately before broadcasting a signed hardware transaction.
  • Completes the proof with the resulting transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Adds focused tests for preparation ordering, retries, and proof completion.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge based on the reviewed hardware-send and payment-proof paths.

The hardware flow prepares the proof before broadcast, retains existing contact-payment preparation safeguards, completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID, and handles repository failures without interrupting payment-success navigation.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.ktAdds idempotent hardware proof preparation and transaction-ID-based proof completion without an accepted correctness issue.
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.ktCompletes the hardware payment proof before advancing the successful broadcast flow.
app/src/test/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModelSendFlowTest.ktVerifies proof preparation ordering, repeated preparation behavior, and completion with the broadcast transaction ID.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant H as Hardware send
participant A as AppViewModel
participant P as Paykit proof repository
participant W as Hardware wallet
U->>H: Confirm hardware payment
H->>W: Sign transaction
W-->>H: Signed transaction
H->>A: prepareHardwareContactPayment()
A->>P: Prepare payment proof
A->>A: Consume private list and accept request
A-->>H: Preparation succeeded
H->>H: Broadcast signed transaction
H-->>A: Transaction ID
A->>P: Complete proof with transaction ID
A->>A: Show payment success
Loading

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "fix: send hardware payment proofs" | Re-trigger Greptile

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 48f0d0a to 82d6c73CompareAugust 31, 2026 17:49
@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2026
13 tasks

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 82d6c73 to e1053b0CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:48
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e9ce645 to ad132c8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:54
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from 850c252 to bac8656CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:06
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from f08381d to 1eee260CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from bac8656 to 6bb8501CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from 1eee260 to e819704CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 6bb8501 to 7a6646cCompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e819704 to f17eff8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:37
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 7a6646c to a92ca77CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:38
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch 4 times, most recently from c72a4c3 to 10ff0dfCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:08
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from a92ca77 to af462caCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:17
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 1, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android to masterSeptember 2, 2026 10:16
@jvsena42
jvsena42 dismissed ovitrif’s stale reviewSeptember 2, 2026 10:16

The base branch was changed.

@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Starting review

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from af462ca to 1d50070CompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:22
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from d0bf6c2 to e84d74aCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:46
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from e84d74a to 35c0b4cCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:56
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 2, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 16c7158 to 1769cb2CompareSeptember 2, 2026 17:18
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up: current signed head is 1769cb2. The first CI run compiled the production code and ran 2,290 tests; its only failure was the new assertion mixing one raw endpoint with Mockito matchers. That assertion now uses eq(endpoint), static analysis remains clean for all changed files, and fresh CI is running.

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ben-kaufman@jvsena42@ovitrif
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix: send hardware payment proofs - #1199

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android
Open

fix: send hardware payment proofs#1199
ben-kaufman wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends Paykit payment proofs for on-chain payment requests paid from a hardware wallet. It is stacked on #1178 so the proof-delivery changes remain isolated from the subscription work.

Description

  • Prepares the payment proof immediately before hardware broadcast, after signing succeeds.
  • Preserves the existing private Payment List consumption and request acceptance order.
  • Completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Keeps preparation idempotent across hardware broadcast retries.

Preview

N/A

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. Incoming on-chain Payment Request → choose a hardware wallet → review → sign and broadcast: payment succeeds and the requester receives its transaction proof.
  • 2.regression: hardware broadcast retry → retry the same signed transaction: the request is not accepted twice and the private Payment List is not consumed twice.

Automated Checks

  • AppViewModelSendFlowTest.kt: verifies hardware proof preparation ordering and idempotency, plus proof completion with the broadcast transaction ID.
  • ./gradlew testDevDebugUnitTest --tests 'to.bitkit.viewmodels.AppViewModelSendFlowTest'

@greptile-apps

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary

This PR extends incoming on-chain Paykit payment proofs to hardware-wallet sends while preserving preparation idempotency and the existing request-consumption order.

  • Prepares the proof immediately before broadcasting a signed hardware transaction.
  • Completes the proof with the resulting transaction ID before showing payment success.
  • Adds focused tests for preparation ordering, retries, and proof completion.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge based on the reviewed hardware-send and payment-proof paths.

The hardware flow prepares the proof before broadcast, retains existing contact-payment preparation safeguards, completes the proof with the broadcast transaction ID, and handles repository failures without interrupting payment-success navigation.

Important Files Changed

FilenameOverview
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.ktAdds idempotent hardware proof preparation and transaction-ID-based proof completion without an accepted correctness issue.
app/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.ktCompletes the hardware payment proof before advancing the successful broadcast flow.
app/src/test/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModelSendFlowTest.ktVerifies proof preparation ordering, repeated preparation behavior, and completion with the broadcast transaction ID.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant H as Hardware send
participant A as AppViewModel
participant P as Paykit proof repository
participant W as Hardware wallet
U->>H: Confirm hardware payment
H->>W: Sign transaction
W-->>H: Signed transaction
H->>A: prepareHardwareContactPayment()
A->>P: Prepare payment proof
A->>A: Consume private list and accept request
A-->>H: Preparation succeeded
H->>H: Broadcast signed transaction
H-->>A: Transaction ID
A->>P: Complete proof with transaction ID
A->>A: Show payment success
Loading

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "fix: send hardware payment proofs" | Re-trigger Greptile

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 48f0d0a to 82d6c73CompareAugust 31, 2026 17:49
@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2026
13 tasks

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 82d6c73 to e1053b0CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:48
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e9ce645 to ad132c8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 12:54
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from 850c252 to bac8656CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:06
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from f08381d to 1eee260CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from bac8656 to 6bb8501CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:19
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from 1eee260 to e819704CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 6bb8501 to 7a6646cCompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:29
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch from e819704 to f17eff8CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:37
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 7a6646c to a92ca77CompareSeptember 1, 2026 18:38
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android branch 4 times, most recently from c72a4c3 to 10ff0dfCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:08
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from a92ca77 to af462caCompareSeptember 1, 2026 19:17
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 1, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-proofs-android to masterSeptember 2, 2026 10:16
@jvsena42
jvsena42 dismissed ovitrif’s stale reviewSeptember 2, 2026 10:16

The base branch was changed.

@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Starting review

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/sheets/SendSheet.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt Outdated
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from af462ca to 1d50070CompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:22
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch 2 times, most recently from d0bf6c2 to e84d74aCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:46
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from e84d74a to 35c0b4cCompareSeptember 2, 2026 13:56
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Sep 2, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/AppViewModel.kt
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-hardware-payment-proofs-android branch from 16c7158 to 1769cb2CompareSeptember 2, 2026 17:18
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up: current signed head is 1769cb2. The first CI run compiled the production code and ran 2,290 tests; its only failure was the new assertion mixing one raw endpoint with Mockito matchers. That assertion now uses eq(endpoint), static analysis remains clean for all changed files, and fresh CI is running.

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ben-kaufman@jvsena42@ovitrif