Fix LSP balance calculation - #255

Merged
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit
Jul 28, 2025
Merged

Fix LSP balance calculation#255
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#137 Related to #229

Description

Fixes the LSP channel size calculation

  • Simplify lspBalance calculation
  • Removes limit based on user onChain balance
  • Collect LSP values from viewmodel

Will be implemented in the next PRs

  • Layout fix for small screens
  • Error message improvements
  • Improvement on max amount button logic
  • Layout logic cleanup
  • Unit tests

Preview

Android Logs

2025-07-28 07:24:44.645 12684-12772 APP to.bitkit.dev I INFOℹ️: Sending 51170 sats to bcrt1qvr6guch7pkgwhhz7kthvdghfdgy79urrcw746n with satsPerVByte=1 [LightningService.kt:412]
2025-07-28 07:24:45.387 12684-12684 APP to.bitkit.dev D DEBUG: Started to watch order '7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09' - TransferViewModel [TransferViewModel.kt:99]

Blocktant logs

:information_source: info: Created order 7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09
lspBalanceSat=100000, clientBalanceSat=50000, source=bitkit-android, discountCode=undefined

QA Notes

Reference

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 24, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 28, 2025 11:08
@ovitrif

ovitrif commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

The original bug was affecting pre-order creation logic, so it's not a blocker to merge, though would've loved to test e2e

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice and easier to reason about!

added 2 comments about code formatting preference, if you agree feel free to update in next PR 👍🏻

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit 93a5473 into masterJul 28, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the fix/transfer-spending-limit branch July 28, 2025 11:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Transfer to Spending issue on wallets of 490.000+ onchain sats

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix LSP balance calculation - #255

Merged
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit
Jul 28, 2025
Merged

Fix LSP balance calculation#255
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#137 Related to #229

Description

Fixes the LSP channel size calculation

  • Simplify lspBalance calculation
  • Removes limit based on user onChain balance
  • Collect LSP values from viewmodel

Will be implemented in the next PRs

  • Layout fix for small screens
  • Error message improvements
  • Improvement on max amount button logic
  • Layout logic cleanup
  • Unit tests

Preview

Android Logs

2025-07-28 07:24:44.645 12684-12772 APP to.bitkit.dev I INFOℹ️: Sending 51170 sats to bcrt1qvr6guch7pkgwhhz7kthvdghfdgy79urrcw746n with satsPerVByte=1 [LightningService.kt:412]
2025-07-28 07:24:45.387 12684-12684 APP to.bitkit.dev D DEBUG: Started to watch order '7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09' - TransferViewModel [TransferViewModel.kt:99]

Blocktant logs

:information_source: info: Created order 7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09
lspBalanceSat=100000, clientBalanceSat=50000, source=bitkit-android, discountCode=undefined

QA Notes

Reference

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 24, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 28, 2025 11:08
@ovitrif

ovitrif commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

The original bug was affecting pre-order creation logic, so it's not a blocker to merge, though would've loved to test e2e

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice and easier to reason about!

added 2 comments about code formatting preference, if you agree feel free to update in next PR 👍🏻

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit 93a5473 into masterJul 28, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the fix/transfer-spending-limit branch July 28, 2025 11:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Transfer to Spending issue on wallets of 490.000+ onchain sats

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix LSP balance calculation - #255

Merged
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit
Jul 28, 2025
Merged

Fix LSP balance calculation#255
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#137 Related to #229

Description

Fixes the LSP channel size calculation

  • Simplify lspBalance calculation
  • Removes limit based on user onChain balance
  • Collect LSP values from viewmodel

Will be implemented in the next PRs

  • Layout fix for small screens
  • Error message improvements
  • Improvement on max amount button logic
  • Layout logic cleanup
  • Unit tests

Preview

Android Logs

2025-07-28 07:24:44.645 12684-12772 APP to.bitkit.dev I INFOℹ️: Sending 51170 sats to bcrt1qvr6guch7pkgwhhz7kthvdghfdgy79urrcw746n with satsPerVByte=1 [LightningService.kt:412]
2025-07-28 07:24:45.387 12684-12684 APP to.bitkit.dev D DEBUG: Started to watch order '7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09' - TransferViewModel [TransferViewModel.kt:99]

Blocktant logs

:information_source: info: Created order 7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09
lspBalanceSat=100000, clientBalanceSat=50000, source=bitkit-android, discountCode=undefined

QA Notes

Reference

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 24, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 28, 2025 11:08
@ovitrif

ovitrif commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

The original bug was affecting pre-order creation logic, so it's not a blocker to merge, though would've loved to test e2e

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice and easier to reason about!

added 2 comments about code formatting preference, if you agree feel free to update in next PR 👍🏻

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit 93a5473 into masterJul 28, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the fix/transfer-spending-limit branch July 28, 2025 11:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Transfer to Spending issue on wallets of 490.000+ onchain sats

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix LSP balance calculation - #255

Merged
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit
Jul 28, 2025
Merged

Fix LSP balance calculation#255
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#137 Related to #229

Description

Fixes the LSP channel size calculation

  • Simplify lspBalance calculation
  • Removes limit based on user onChain balance
  • Collect LSP values from viewmodel

Will be implemented in the next PRs

  • Layout fix for small screens
  • Error message improvements
  • Improvement on max amount button logic
  • Layout logic cleanup
  • Unit tests

Preview

Android Logs

2025-07-28 07:24:44.645 12684-12772 APP to.bitkit.dev I INFOℹ️: Sending 51170 sats to bcrt1qvr6guch7pkgwhhz7kthvdghfdgy79urrcw746n with satsPerVByte=1 [LightningService.kt:412]
2025-07-28 07:24:45.387 12684-12684 APP to.bitkit.dev D DEBUG: Started to watch order '7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09' - TransferViewModel [TransferViewModel.kt:99]

Blocktant logs

:information_source: info: Created order 7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09
lspBalanceSat=100000, clientBalanceSat=50000, source=bitkit-android, discountCode=undefined

QA Notes

Reference

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 24, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 28, 2025 11:08
@ovitrif

ovitrif commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

The original bug was affecting pre-order creation logic, so it's not a blocker to merge, though would've loved to test e2e

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice and easier to reason about!

added 2 comments about code formatting preference, if you agree feel free to update in next PR 👍🏻

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit 93a5473 into masterJul 28, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the fix/transfer-spending-limit branch July 28, 2025 11:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Transfer to Spending issue on wallets of 490.000+ onchain sats

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix LSP balance calculation - #255

Merged
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit
Jul 28, 2025
Merged

Fix LSP balance calculation#255
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#137 Related to #229

Description

Fixes the LSP channel size calculation

  • Simplify lspBalance calculation
  • Removes limit based on user onChain balance
  • Collect LSP values from viewmodel

Will be implemented in the next PRs

  • Layout fix for small screens
  • Error message improvements
  • Improvement on max amount button logic
  • Layout logic cleanup
  • Unit tests

Preview

Android Logs

2025-07-28 07:24:44.645 12684-12772 APP to.bitkit.dev I INFOℹ️: Sending 51170 sats to bcrt1qvr6guch7pkgwhhz7kthvdghfdgy79urrcw746n with satsPerVByte=1 [LightningService.kt:412]
2025-07-28 07:24:45.387 12684-12684 APP to.bitkit.dev D DEBUG: Started to watch order '7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09' - TransferViewModel [TransferViewModel.kt:99]

Blocktant logs

:information_source: info: Created order 7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09
lspBalanceSat=100000, clientBalanceSat=50000, source=bitkit-android, discountCode=undefined

QA Notes

Reference

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 24, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 28, 2025 11:08
@ovitrif

ovitrif commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

The original bug was affecting pre-order creation logic, so it's not a blocker to merge, though would've loved to test e2e

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice and easier to reason about!

added 2 comments about code formatting preference, if you agree feel free to update in next PR 👍🏻

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit 93a5473 into masterJul 28, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the fix/transfer-spending-limit branch July 28, 2025 11:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Transfer to Spending issue on wallets of 490.000+ onchain sats

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix LSP balance calculation - #255

Merged
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit
Jul 28, 2025
Merged

Fix LSP balance calculation#255
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#137 Related to #229

Description

Fixes the LSP channel size calculation

  • Simplify lspBalance calculation
  • Removes limit based on user onChain balance
  • Collect LSP values from viewmodel

Will be implemented in the next PRs

  • Layout fix for small screens
  • Error message improvements
  • Improvement on max amount button logic
  • Layout logic cleanup
  • Unit tests

Preview

Android Logs

2025-07-28 07:24:44.645 12684-12772 APP to.bitkit.dev I INFOℹ️: Sending 51170 sats to bcrt1qvr6guch7pkgwhhz7kthvdghfdgy79urrcw746n with satsPerVByte=1 [LightningService.kt:412]
2025-07-28 07:24:45.387 12684-12684 APP to.bitkit.dev D DEBUG: Started to watch order '7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09' - TransferViewModel [TransferViewModel.kt:99]

Blocktant logs

:information_source: info: Created order 7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09
lspBalanceSat=100000, clientBalanceSat=50000, source=bitkit-android, discountCode=undefined

QA Notes

Reference

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 24, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 28, 2025 11:08
@ovitrif

ovitrif commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

The original bug was affecting pre-order creation logic, so it's not a blocker to merge, though would've loved to test e2e

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice and easier to reason about!

added 2 comments about code formatting preference, if you agree feel free to update in next PR 👍🏻

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit 93a5473 into masterJul 28, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the fix/transfer-spending-limit branch July 28, 2025 11:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Transfer to Spending issue on wallets of 490.000+ onchain sats

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix LSP balance calculation - #255

Merged
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit
Jul 28, 2025
Merged

Fix LSP balance calculation#255
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#137 Related to #229

Description

Fixes the LSP channel size calculation

  • Simplify lspBalance calculation
  • Removes limit based on user onChain balance
  • Collect LSP values from viewmodel

Will be implemented in the next PRs

  • Layout fix for small screens
  • Error message improvements
  • Improvement on max amount button logic
  • Layout logic cleanup
  • Unit tests

Preview

Android Logs

2025-07-28 07:24:44.645 12684-12772 APP to.bitkit.dev I INFOℹ️: Sending 51170 sats to bcrt1qvr6guch7pkgwhhz7kthvdghfdgy79urrcw746n with satsPerVByte=1 [LightningService.kt:412]
2025-07-28 07:24:45.387 12684-12684 APP to.bitkit.dev D DEBUG: Started to watch order '7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09' - TransferViewModel [TransferViewModel.kt:99]

Blocktant logs

:information_source: info: Created order 7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09
lspBalanceSat=100000, clientBalanceSat=50000, source=bitkit-android, discountCode=undefined

QA Notes

Reference

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 24, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 28, 2025 11:08
@ovitrif

ovitrif commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

The original bug was affecting pre-order creation logic, so it's not a blocker to merge, though would've loved to test e2e

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice and easier to reason about!

added 2 comments about code formatting preference, if you agree feel free to update in next PR 👍🏻

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit 93a5473 into masterJul 28, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the fix/transfer-spending-limit branch July 28, 2025 11:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Transfer to Spending issue on wallets of 490.000+ onchain sats

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Fix LSP balance calculation - #255

Merged
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit
Jul 28, 2025
Merged

Fix LSP balance calculation#255
jvsena42 merged 12 commits into
masterfrom
fix/transfer-spending-limit

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#137 Related to #229

Description

Fixes the LSP channel size calculation

  • Simplify lspBalance calculation
  • Removes limit based on user onChain balance
  • Collect LSP values from viewmodel

Will be implemented in the next PRs

  • Layout fix for small screens
  • Error message improvements
  • Improvement on max amount button logic
  • Layout logic cleanup
  • Unit tests

Preview

Android Logs

2025-07-28 07:24:44.645 12684-12772 APP to.bitkit.dev I INFOℹ️: Sending 51170 sats to bcrt1qvr6guch7pkgwhhz7kthvdghfdgy79urrcw746n with satsPerVByte=1 [LightningService.kt:412]
2025-07-28 07:24:45.387 12684-12684 APP to.bitkit.dev D DEBUG: Started to watch order '7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09' - TransferViewModel [TransferViewModel.kt:99]

Blocktant logs

:information_source: info: Created order 7ad5c80b-01b7-4328-967a-7223b6f61e09
lspBalanceSat=100000, clientBalanceSat=50000, source=bitkit-android, discountCode=undefined

QA Notes

Reference

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 24, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 28, 2025 10:50
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 28, 2025 11:08
@ovitrif

ovitrif commented Jul 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The order was created with success, but Blocktank still hasn't approved

https://synonymworkspace.slack.com/archives/C02FYR1JSNS/p1753698281354129

The original bug was affecting pre-order creation logic, so it's not a blocker to merge, though would've loved to test e2e

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice and easier to reason about!

added 2 comments about code formatting preference, if you agree feel free to update in next PR 👍🏻

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt
@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit 93a5473 into masterJul 28, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the fix/transfer-spending-limit branch July 28, 2025 11:33
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Transfer to Spending issue on wallets of 490.000+ onchain sats

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security