Skip to content

feat: send paykit payment proofs - #683

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs
Open

feat: send paykit payment proofs#683
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends a Paykit payment proof back to the requester after Bitkit successfully pays an incoming private payment request.

Description

  1. Persists the payer identity, request, and selected endpoint before request acceptance, then associates the Lightning payment hash before sending so restart recovery keeps the correct correlation.
  2. Persists successful on-chain transaction IDs and validated Lightning preimages before submitting them against the original one-time request and exact endpoint.
  3. Uses Paykit's durable private outbox, retries incomplete submissions during normal request refresh, and suppresses duplicate proofs already recorded by the SDK.
  4. Preserves earlier in-flight correlations across retries, clears the request after one proof is queued, and reads the secure store directly so wallet wipes cannot resurrect cached proof state.
  5. Attempts immediate SDK delivery if persisting a completed proof fails, without adding any user-facing UI.

This PR is stacked on #676. Companion Android PR: synonymdev/bitkit-android#1178

Linked Issues/Tasks

N/A

Screenshot / Video

N/A — there are no UI changes.

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. iOS → create a private request for Android → Android receives and pays on regtest: iOS records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.
  • 2. Android → create a private request for iOS → iOS receives and pays on regtest: Android records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.

Automated Checks

  • PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests.swift: 8 tests cover restart retry, duplicate suppression, invalid Lightning preimage rejection, failed-payment cleanup, exact on-chain proof submission, overlapping retries, wallet-store clearing, and completed-proof persistence failure.
  • Focused iOS proof tests passed: 8 tests, 0 failures.
  • Final iOS simulator Debug test build passed.
  • SwiftFormat and git diff --check passed.

@greptile-apps

This comment has been minimized.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift Outdated
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from 8801387 to c5d04c7CompareAugust 24, 2026 18:33

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On-chain payment proofs cannot recover after a store-load failure, so a successful send can still leave the requester without proof.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift
Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-request-ui to masterAugust 25, 2026 17:02
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 25, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

QA Notes

Ran on iPhone 17 Pro simulator and Pixel_9a emulator on regtest.

  • iOS created a private request for Android, Android paid, and iOS recorded the proof against that request.
  • Android created a private request for iOS, iOS paid, and Android recorded the proof against that request.

Approve.

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2026
12 tasks
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch 2 times, most recently from 01c4164 to bcf1d8aCompareAugust 31, 2026 14:25
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added the cross-platform proof-state hardening in c3f2d8c: corrupt persisted proof state is discarded instead of permanently blocking reconciliation, empty state removes the Keychain entry, and the frequent refresh path returns before calling Paykit when there is nothing to reconcile. The full payment-proof suite passes 22/22 on the restacked subscriptions head.

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from c3f2d8c to 281b865CompareAugust 31, 2026 18:30
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up after the final cleanup: the hardening commit is now 281b8654 (signed). I removed the unnecessary decoder-only test hook while keeping the meaningful regression that proves empty reconciliation skips the Paykit SDK. PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests: 21/21 passing.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI note: the remaining pubky_paykit red check is test-harness instability rather than a proof-code failure. Its three internal attempts failed at Appium session creation, waiting for the generic send slider, and teardown/profile cleanup respectively; the final attempt had already dragged the send slider successfully. The same Paykit staging scenario passes on stacked PR #685 with this exact proof implementation. GitHub currently refuses an isolated rerun because this workflow’s unrelated local E2E job is still queued; I will rerun the failed job once the workflow finishes.

ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@jvsena42jvsena42 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found some points that worth a double check

Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
jvsena42

This comment was marked as resolved.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jvsena42 Fixed in e66771b. The Payment Request card now uses the shared expanded CustomButton layout in this PR, so the Figma button sizing fix is no longer deferred to #685. The proof delivery comments are also addressed in this head and replied to inline.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The requested proof lifecycle and Payment Request button fixes are now on the signed e66771b head, all inline threads are resolved, and the focused proof tests pass. @jvsena42 and @ovitrif please re-review when the current E2E run finishes.

@piotr-iohk

piotr-iohk commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Retested latest revision, iPhone 17 sim ↔ Pixel emu (same session as android #1178).

Amount edit on pay (iOS only)
Paying an incoming request opens the amount pad on iOS. Android goes straight to Confirm and the amount is locked. I changed 1000 → 1009 and swipe failed with Payment failed: amountMismatch (SendConfirmationView.performPayment). Confirm already blocks the amount tap when incomingPaymentRequest is set; looks like the first route still lands on .amount when the opened LN invoice amount is 0.

Recording:

Screen.Recording.2026-09-01.at.16.08.22.mov

Request lists don’t match
Same session, both on TODAY:

  • iOS: 3× 1000 + 26 000 (no 25 000)
  • Android: 2× 1000 + 26 000 + 25 000

Not amount-keyed overwrite in the app list — IDs are paymentRequestId + counterparty + path. The 25k did land: Android sent it on-chain, iOS activity shows +25 000 (81eaa51b…). It’s missing as an iOS request-history row. Extra 1k on iOS / missing 1k on Android looks like the same thing. Hypothesis: after fulfill, one side drops the row when localRole is missing/unknown (history mapping skips those). Avatars A vs I are just the contact names.

Screenshot (Payment Requests list):
Screenshot 2026-09-01 at 16 12 09

Logs:
bitkit_logs_2026-09-01_14-14-42.zip

Proofs still queued on the successful pays (LN + on-chain both ways). Amount pad / list drift look like follow-ups, not a proofs blocker.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ben-kaufman@piotr-iohk@ovitrif@jvsena42
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
feat: send paykit payment proofs by ben-kaufman · Pull Request #683 · synonymdev/bitkit-ios · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: send paykit payment proofs - #683

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs
Open

feat: send paykit payment proofs#683
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends a Paykit payment proof back to the requester after Bitkit successfully pays an incoming private payment request.

Description

  1. Persists the payer identity, request, and selected endpoint before request acceptance, then associates the Lightning payment hash before sending so restart recovery keeps the correct correlation.
  2. Persists successful on-chain transaction IDs and validated Lightning preimages before submitting them against the original one-time request and exact endpoint.
  3. Uses Paykit's durable private outbox, retries incomplete submissions during normal request refresh, and suppresses duplicate proofs already recorded by the SDK.
  4. Preserves earlier in-flight correlations across retries, clears the request after one proof is queued, and reads the secure store directly so wallet wipes cannot resurrect cached proof state.
  5. Attempts immediate SDK delivery if persisting a completed proof fails, without adding any user-facing UI.

This PR is stacked on #676. Companion Android PR: synonymdev/bitkit-android#1178

Linked Issues/Tasks

N/A

Screenshot / Video

N/A — there are no UI changes.

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. iOS → create a private request for Android → Android receives and pays on regtest: iOS records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.
  • 2. Android → create a private request for iOS → iOS receives and pays on regtest: Android records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.

Automated Checks

  • PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests.swift: 8 tests cover restart retry, duplicate suppression, invalid Lightning preimage rejection, failed-payment cleanup, exact on-chain proof submission, overlapping retries, wallet-store clearing, and completed-proof persistence failure.
  • Focused iOS proof tests passed: 8 tests, 0 failures.
  • Final iOS simulator Debug test build passed.
  • SwiftFormat and git diff --check passed.

@greptile-apps

This comment has been minimized.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift Outdated
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from 8801387 to c5d04c7CompareAugust 24, 2026 18:33

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On-chain payment proofs cannot recover after a store-load failure, so a successful send can still leave the requester without proof.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift
Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-request-ui to masterAugust 25, 2026 17:02
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 25, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

QA Notes

Ran on iPhone 17 Pro simulator and Pixel_9a emulator on regtest.

  • iOS created a private request for Android, Android paid, and iOS recorded the proof against that request.
  • Android created a private request for iOS, iOS paid, and Android recorded the proof against that request.

Approve.

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2026
12 tasks
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch 2 times, most recently from 01c4164 to bcf1d8aCompareAugust 31, 2026 14:25
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added the cross-platform proof-state hardening in c3f2d8c: corrupt persisted proof state is discarded instead of permanently blocking reconciliation, empty state removes the Keychain entry, and the frequent refresh path returns before calling Paykit when there is nothing to reconcile. The full payment-proof suite passes 22/22 on the restacked subscriptions head.

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from c3f2d8c to 281b865CompareAugust 31, 2026 18:30
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up after the final cleanup: the hardening commit is now 281b8654 (signed). I removed the unnecessary decoder-only test hook while keeping the meaningful regression that proves empty reconciliation skips the Paykit SDK. PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests: 21/21 passing.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI note: the remaining pubky_paykit red check is test-harness instability rather than a proof-code failure. Its three internal attempts failed at Appium session creation, waiting for the generic send slider, and teardown/profile cleanup respectively; the final attempt had already dragged the send slider successfully. The same Paykit staging scenario passes on stacked PR #685 with this exact proof implementation. GitHub currently refuses an isolated rerun because this workflow’s unrelated local E2E job is still queued; I will rerun the failed job once the workflow finishes.

ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@jvsena42jvsena42 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found some points that worth a double check

Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
jvsena42

This comment was marked as resolved.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jvsena42 Fixed in e66771b. The Payment Request card now uses the shared expanded CustomButton layout in this PR, so the Figma button sizing fix is no longer deferred to #685. The proof delivery comments are also addressed in this head and replied to inline.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The requested proof lifecycle and Payment Request button fixes are now on the signed e66771b head, all inline threads are resolved, and the focused proof tests pass. @jvsena42 and @ovitrif please re-review when the current E2E run finishes.

@piotr-iohk

piotr-iohk commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Retested latest revision, iPhone 17 sim ↔ Pixel emu (same session as android #1178).

Amount edit on pay (iOS only)
Paying an incoming request opens the amount pad on iOS. Android goes straight to Confirm and the amount is locked. I changed 1000 → 1009 and swipe failed with Payment failed: amountMismatch (SendConfirmationView.performPayment). Confirm already blocks the amount tap when incomingPaymentRequest is set; looks like the first route still lands on .amount when the opened LN invoice amount is 0.

Recording:

Screen.Recording.2026-09-01.at.16.08.22.mov

Request lists don’t match
Same session, both on TODAY:

  • iOS: 3× 1000 + 26 000 (no 25 000)
  • Android: 2× 1000 + 26 000 + 25 000

Not amount-keyed overwrite in the app list — IDs are paymentRequestId + counterparty + path. The 25k did land: Android sent it on-chain, iOS activity shows +25 000 (81eaa51b…). It’s missing as an iOS request-history row. Extra 1k on iOS / missing 1k on Android looks like the same thing. Hypothesis: after fulfill, one side drops the row when localRole is missing/unknown (history mapping skips those). Avatars A vs I are just the contact names.

Screenshot (Payment Requests list):
Screenshot 2026-09-01 at 16 12 09

Logs:
bitkit_logs_2026-09-01_14-14-42.zip

Proofs still queued on the successful pays (LN + on-chain both ways). Amount pad / list drift look like follow-ups, not a proofs blocker.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ben-kaufman@piotr-iohk@ovitrif@jvsena42
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' feat: send paykit payment proofs by ben-kaufman · Pull Request #683 · synonymdev/bitkit-ios · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: send paykit payment proofs - #683

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs
Open

feat: send paykit payment proofs#683
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends a Paykit payment proof back to the requester after Bitkit successfully pays an incoming private payment request.

Description

  1. Persists the payer identity, request, and selected endpoint before request acceptance, then associates the Lightning payment hash before sending so restart recovery keeps the correct correlation.
  2. Persists successful on-chain transaction IDs and validated Lightning preimages before submitting them against the original one-time request and exact endpoint.
  3. Uses Paykit's durable private outbox, retries incomplete submissions during normal request refresh, and suppresses duplicate proofs already recorded by the SDK.
  4. Preserves earlier in-flight correlations across retries, clears the request after one proof is queued, and reads the secure store directly so wallet wipes cannot resurrect cached proof state.
  5. Attempts immediate SDK delivery if persisting a completed proof fails, without adding any user-facing UI.

This PR is stacked on #676. Companion Android PR: synonymdev/bitkit-android#1178

Linked Issues/Tasks

N/A

Screenshot / Video

N/A — there are no UI changes.

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. iOS → create a private request for Android → Android receives and pays on regtest: iOS records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.
  • 2. Android → create a private request for iOS → iOS receives and pays on regtest: Android records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.

Automated Checks

  • PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests.swift: 8 tests cover restart retry, duplicate suppression, invalid Lightning preimage rejection, failed-payment cleanup, exact on-chain proof submission, overlapping retries, wallet-store clearing, and completed-proof persistence failure.
  • Focused iOS proof tests passed: 8 tests, 0 failures.
  • Final iOS simulator Debug test build passed.
  • SwiftFormat and git diff --check passed.

@greptile-apps

This comment has been minimized.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift Outdated
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from 8801387 to c5d04c7CompareAugust 24, 2026 18:33

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On-chain payment proofs cannot recover after a store-load failure, so a successful send can still leave the requester without proof.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift
Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-request-ui to masterAugust 25, 2026 17:02
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 25, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

QA Notes

Ran on iPhone 17 Pro simulator and Pixel_9a emulator on regtest.

  • iOS created a private request for Android, Android paid, and iOS recorded the proof against that request.
  • Android created a private request for iOS, iOS paid, and Android recorded the proof against that request.

Approve.

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2026
12 tasks
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch 2 times, most recently from 01c4164 to bcf1d8aCompareAugust 31, 2026 14:25
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added the cross-platform proof-state hardening in c3f2d8c: corrupt persisted proof state is discarded instead of permanently blocking reconciliation, empty state removes the Keychain entry, and the frequent refresh path returns before calling Paykit when there is nothing to reconcile. The full payment-proof suite passes 22/22 on the restacked subscriptions head.

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from c3f2d8c to 281b865CompareAugust 31, 2026 18:30
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up after the final cleanup: the hardening commit is now 281b8654 (signed). I removed the unnecessary decoder-only test hook while keeping the meaningful regression that proves empty reconciliation skips the Paykit SDK. PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests: 21/21 passing.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI note: the remaining pubky_paykit red check is test-harness instability rather than a proof-code failure. Its three internal attempts failed at Appium session creation, waiting for the generic send slider, and teardown/profile cleanup respectively; the final attempt had already dragged the send slider successfully. The same Paykit staging scenario passes on stacked PR #685 with this exact proof implementation. GitHub currently refuses an isolated rerun because this workflow’s unrelated local E2E job is still queued; I will rerun the failed job once the workflow finishes.

ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@jvsena42jvsena42 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found some points that worth a double check

Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
jvsena42

This comment was marked as resolved.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jvsena42 Fixed in e66771b. The Payment Request card now uses the shared expanded CustomButton layout in this PR, so the Figma button sizing fix is no longer deferred to #685. The proof delivery comments are also addressed in this head and replied to inline.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The requested proof lifecycle and Payment Request button fixes are now on the signed e66771b head, all inline threads are resolved, and the focused proof tests pass. @jvsena42 and @ovitrif please re-review when the current E2E run finishes.

@piotr-iohk

piotr-iohk commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Retested latest revision, iPhone 17 sim ↔ Pixel emu (same session as android #1178).

Amount edit on pay (iOS only)
Paying an incoming request opens the amount pad on iOS. Android goes straight to Confirm and the amount is locked. I changed 1000 → 1009 and swipe failed with Payment failed: amountMismatch (SendConfirmationView.performPayment). Confirm already blocks the amount tap when incomingPaymentRequest is set; looks like the first route still lands on .amount when the opened LN invoice amount is 0.

Recording:

Screen.Recording.2026-09-01.at.16.08.22.mov

Request lists don’t match
Same session, both on TODAY:

  • iOS: 3× 1000 + 26 000 (no 25 000)
  • Android: 2× 1000 + 26 000 + 25 000

Not amount-keyed overwrite in the app list — IDs are paymentRequestId + counterparty + path. The 25k did land: Android sent it on-chain, iOS activity shows +25 000 (81eaa51b…). It’s missing as an iOS request-history row. Extra 1k on iOS / missing 1k on Android looks like the same thing. Hypothesis: after fulfill, one side drops the row when localRole is missing/unknown (history mapping skips those). Avatars A vs I are just the contact names.

Screenshot (Payment Requests list):
Screenshot 2026-09-01 at 16 12 09

Logs:
bitkit_logs_2026-09-01_14-14-42.zip

Proofs still queued on the successful pays (LN + on-chain both ways). Amount pad / list drift look like follow-ups, not a proofs blocker.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ben-kaufman@piotr-iohk@ovitrif@jvsena42
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' feat: send paykit payment proofs by ben-kaufman · Pull Request #683 · synonymdev/bitkit-ios · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: send paykit payment proofs - #683

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs
Open

feat: send paykit payment proofs#683
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends a Paykit payment proof back to the requester after Bitkit successfully pays an incoming private payment request.

Description

  1. Persists the payer identity, request, and selected endpoint before request acceptance, then associates the Lightning payment hash before sending so restart recovery keeps the correct correlation.
  2. Persists successful on-chain transaction IDs and validated Lightning preimages before submitting them against the original one-time request and exact endpoint.
  3. Uses Paykit's durable private outbox, retries incomplete submissions during normal request refresh, and suppresses duplicate proofs already recorded by the SDK.
  4. Preserves earlier in-flight correlations across retries, clears the request after one proof is queued, and reads the secure store directly so wallet wipes cannot resurrect cached proof state.
  5. Attempts immediate SDK delivery if persisting a completed proof fails, without adding any user-facing UI.

This PR is stacked on #676. Companion Android PR: synonymdev/bitkit-android#1178

Linked Issues/Tasks

N/A

Screenshot / Video

N/A — there are no UI changes.

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. iOS → create a private request for Android → Android receives and pays on regtest: iOS records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.
  • 2. Android → create a private request for iOS → iOS receives and pays on regtest: Android records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.

Automated Checks

  • PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests.swift: 8 tests cover restart retry, duplicate suppression, invalid Lightning preimage rejection, failed-payment cleanup, exact on-chain proof submission, overlapping retries, wallet-store clearing, and completed-proof persistence failure.
  • Focused iOS proof tests passed: 8 tests, 0 failures.
  • Final iOS simulator Debug test build passed.
  • SwiftFormat and git diff --check passed.

@greptile-apps

This comment has been minimized.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift Outdated
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from 8801387 to c5d04c7CompareAugust 24, 2026 18:33

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On-chain payment proofs cannot recover after a store-load failure, so a successful send can still leave the requester without proof.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift
Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-request-ui to masterAugust 25, 2026 17:02
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 25, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

QA Notes

Ran on iPhone 17 Pro simulator and Pixel_9a emulator on regtest.

  • iOS created a private request for Android, Android paid, and iOS recorded the proof against that request.
  • Android created a private request for iOS, iOS paid, and Android recorded the proof against that request.

Approve.

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2026
12 tasks
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch 2 times, most recently from 01c4164 to bcf1d8aCompareAugust 31, 2026 14:25
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added the cross-platform proof-state hardening in c3f2d8c: corrupt persisted proof state is discarded instead of permanently blocking reconciliation, empty state removes the Keychain entry, and the frequent refresh path returns before calling Paykit when there is nothing to reconcile. The full payment-proof suite passes 22/22 on the restacked subscriptions head.

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from c3f2d8c to 281b865CompareAugust 31, 2026 18:30
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up after the final cleanup: the hardening commit is now 281b8654 (signed). I removed the unnecessary decoder-only test hook while keeping the meaningful regression that proves empty reconciliation skips the Paykit SDK. PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests: 21/21 passing.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI note: the remaining pubky_paykit red check is test-harness instability rather than a proof-code failure. Its three internal attempts failed at Appium session creation, waiting for the generic send slider, and teardown/profile cleanup respectively; the final attempt had already dragged the send slider successfully. The same Paykit staging scenario passes on stacked PR #685 with this exact proof implementation. GitHub currently refuses an isolated rerun because this workflow’s unrelated local E2E job is still queued; I will rerun the failed job once the workflow finishes.

ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@jvsena42jvsena42 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found some points that worth a double check

Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
jvsena42

This comment was marked as resolved.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jvsena42 Fixed in e66771b. The Payment Request card now uses the shared expanded CustomButton layout in this PR, so the Figma button sizing fix is no longer deferred to #685. The proof delivery comments are also addressed in this head and replied to inline.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The requested proof lifecycle and Payment Request button fixes are now on the signed e66771b head, all inline threads are resolved, and the focused proof tests pass. @jvsena42 and @ovitrif please re-review when the current E2E run finishes.

@piotr-iohk

piotr-iohk commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Retested latest revision, iPhone 17 sim ↔ Pixel emu (same session as android #1178).

Amount edit on pay (iOS only)
Paying an incoming request opens the amount pad on iOS. Android goes straight to Confirm and the amount is locked. I changed 1000 → 1009 and swipe failed with Payment failed: amountMismatch (SendConfirmationView.performPayment). Confirm already blocks the amount tap when incomingPaymentRequest is set; looks like the first route still lands on .amount when the opened LN invoice amount is 0.

Recording:

Screen.Recording.2026-09-01.at.16.08.22.mov

Request lists don’t match
Same session, both on TODAY:

  • iOS: 3× 1000 + 26 000 (no 25 000)
  • Android: 2× 1000 + 26 000 + 25 000

Not amount-keyed overwrite in the app list — IDs are paymentRequestId + counterparty + path. The 25k did land: Android sent it on-chain, iOS activity shows +25 000 (81eaa51b…). It’s missing as an iOS request-history row. Extra 1k on iOS / missing 1k on Android looks like the same thing. Hypothesis: after fulfill, one side drops the row when localRole is missing/unknown (history mapping skips those). Avatars A vs I are just the contact names.

Screenshot (Payment Requests list):
Screenshot 2026-09-01 at 16 12 09

Logs:
bitkit_logs_2026-09-01_14-14-42.zip

Proofs still queued on the successful pays (LN + on-chain both ways). Amount pad / list drift look like follow-ups, not a proofs blocker.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ben-kaufman@piotr-iohk@ovitrif@jvsena42
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' feat: send paykit payment proofs by ben-kaufman · Pull Request #683 · synonymdev/bitkit-ios · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: send paykit payment proofs - #683

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs
Open

feat: send paykit payment proofs#683
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends a Paykit payment proof back to the requester after Bitkit successfully pays an incoming private payment request.

Description

  1. Persists the payer identity, request, and selected endpoint before request acceptance, then associates the Lightning payment hash before sending so restart recovery keeps the correct correlation.
  2. Persists successful on-chain transaction IDs and validated Lightning preimages before submitting them against the original one-time request and exact endpoint.
  3. Uses Paykit's durable private outbox, retries incomplete submissions during normal request refresh, and suppresses duplicate proofs already recorded by the SDK.
  4. Preserves earlier in-flight correlations across retries, clears the request after one proof is queued, and reads the secure store directly so wallet wipes cannot resurrect cached proof state.
  5. Attempts immediate SDK delivery if persisting a completed proof fails, without adding any user-facing UI.

This PR is stacked on #676. Companion Android PR: synonymdev/bitkit-android#1178

Linked Issues/Tasks

N/A

Screenshot / Video

N/A — there are no UI changes.

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. iOS → create a private request for Android → Android receives and pays on regtest: iOS records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.
  • 2. Android → create a private request for iOS → iOS receives and pays on regtest: Android records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.

Automated Checks

  • PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests.swift: 8 tests cover restart retry, duplicate suppression, invalid Lightning preimage rejection, failed-payment cleanup, exact on-chain proof submission, overlapping retries, wallet-store clearing, and completed-proof persistence failure.
  • Focused iOS proof tests passed: 8 tests, 0 failures.
  • Final iOS simulator Debug test build passed.
  • SwiftFormat and git diff --check passed.

@greptile-apps

This comment has been minimized.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift Outdated
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from 8801387 to c5d04c7CompareAugust 24, 2026 18:33

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On-chain payment proofs cannot recover after a store-load failure, so a successful send can still leave the requester without proof.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift
Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-request-ui to masterAugust 25, 2026 17:02
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 25, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

QA Notes

Ran on iPhone 17 Pro simulator and Pixel_9a emulator on regtest.

  • iOS created a private request for Android, Android paid, and iOS recorded the proof against that request.
  • Android created a private request for iOS, iOS paid, and Android recorded the proof against that request.

Approve.

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2026
12 tasks
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch 2 times, most recently from 01c4164 to bcf1d8aCompareAugust 31, 2026 14:25
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added the cross-platform proof-state hardening in c3f2d8c: corrupt persisted proof state is discarded instead of permanently blocking reconciliation, empty state removes the Keychain entry, and the frequent refresh path returns before calling Paykit when there is nothing to reconcile. The full payment-proof suite passes 22/22 on the restacked subscriptions head.

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from c3f2d8c to 281b865CompareAugust 31, 2026 18:30
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up after the final cleanup: the hardening commit is now 281b8654 (signed). I removed the unnecessary decoder-only test hook while keeping the meaningful regression that proves empty reconciliation skips the Paykit SDK. PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests: 21/21 passing.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI note: the remaining pubky_paykit red check is test-harness instability rather than a proof-code failure. Its three internal attempts failed at Appium session creation, waiting for the generic send slider, and teardown/profile cleanup respectively; the final attempt had already dragged the send slider successfully. The same Paykit staging scenario passes on stacked PR #685 with this exact proof implementation. GitHub currently refuses an isolated rerun because this workflow’s unrelated local E2E job is still queued; I will rerun the failed job once the workflow finishes.

ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@jvsena42jvsena42 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found some points that worth a double check

Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
jvsena42

This comment was marked as resolved.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jvsena42 Fixed in e66771b. The Payment Request card now uses the shared expanded CustomButton layout in this PR, so the Figma button sizing fix is no longer deferred to #685. The proof delivery comments are also addressed in this head and replied to inline.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The requested proof lifecycle and Payment Request button fixes are now on the signed e66771b head, all inline threads are resolved, and the focused proof tests pass. @jvsena42 and @ovitrif please re-review when the current E2E run finishes.

@piotr-iohk

piotr-iohk commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Retested latest revision, iPhone 17 sim ↔ Pixel emu (same session as android #1178).

Amount edit on pay (iOS only)
Paying an incoming request opens the amount pad on iOS. Android goes straight to Confirm and the amount is locked. I changed 1000 → 1009 and swipe failed with Payment failed: amountMismatch (SendConfirmationView.performPayment). Confirm already blocks the amount tap when incomingPaymentRequest is set; looks like the first route still lands on .amount when the opened LN invoice amount is 0.

Recording:

Screen.Recording.2026-09-01.at.16.08.22.mov

Request lists don’t match
Same session, both on TODAY:

  • iOS: 3× 1000 + 26 000 (no 25 000)
  • Android: 2× 1000 + 26 000 + 25 000

Not amount-keyed overwrite in the app list — IDs are paymentRequestId + counterparty + path. The 25k did land: Android sent it on-chain, iOS activity shows +25 000 (81eaa51b…). It’s missing as an iOS request-history row. Extra 1k on iOS / missing 1k on Android looks like the same thing. Hypothesis: after fulfill, one side drops the row when localRole is missing/unknown (history mapping skips those). Avatars A vs I are just the contact names.

Screenshot (Payment Requests list):
Screenshot 2026-09-01 at 16 12 09

Logs:
bitkit_logs_2026-09-01_14-14-42.zip

Proofs still queued on the successful pays (LN + on-chain both ways). Amount pad / list drift look like follow-ups, not a proofs blocker.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ben-kaufman@piotr-iohk@ovitrif@jvsena42
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' feat: send paykit payment proofs by ben-kaufman · Pull Request #683 · synonymdev/bitkit-ios · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: send paykit payment proofs - #683

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs
Open

feat: send paykit payment proofs#683
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends a Paykit payment proof back to the requester after Bitkit successfully pays an incoming private payment request.

Description

  1. Persists the payer identity, request, and selected endpoint before request acceptance, then associates the Lightning payment hash before sending so restart recovery keeps the correct correlation.
  2. Persists successful on-chain transaction IDs and validated Lightning preimages before submitting them against the original one-time request and exact endpoint.
  3. Uses Paykit's durable private outbox, retries incomplete submissions during normal request refresh, and suppresses duplicate proofs already recorded by the SDK.
  4. Preserves earlier in-flight correlations across retries, clears the request after one proof is queued, and reads the secure store directly so wallet wipes cannot resurrect cached proof state.
  5. Attempts immediate SDK delivery if persisting a completed proof fails, without adding any user-facing UI.

This PR is stacked on #676. Companion Android PR: synonymdev/bitkit-android#1178

Linked Issues/Tasks

N/A

Screenshot / Video

N/A — there are no UI changes.

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. iOS → create a private request for Android → Android receives and pays on regtest: iOS records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.
  • 2. Android → create a private request for iOS → iOS receives and pays on regtest: Android records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.

Automated Checks

  • PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests.swift: 8 tests cover restart retry, duplicate suppression, invalid Lightning preimage rejection, failed-payment cleanup, exact on-chain proof submission, overlapping retries, wallet-store clearing, and completed-proof persistence failure.
  • Focused iOS proof tests passed: 8 tests, 0 failures.
  • Final iOS simulator Debug test build passed.
  • SwiftFormat and git diff --check passed.

@greptile-apps

This comment has been minimized.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift Outdated
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from 8801387 to c5d04c7CompareAugust 24, 2026 18:33

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On-chain payment proofs cannot recover after a store-load failure, so a successful send can still leave the requester without proof.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift
Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-request-ui to masterAugust 25, 2026 17:02
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 25, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

QA Notes

Ran on iPhone 17 Pro simulator and Pixel_9a emulator on regtest.

  • iOS created a private request for Android, Android paid, and iOS recorded the proof against that request.
  • Android created a private request for iOS, iOS paid, and Android recorded the proof against that request.

Approve.

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2026
12 tasks
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch 2 times, most recently from 01c4164 to bcf1d8aCompareAugust 31, 2026 14:25
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added the cross-platform proof-state hardening in c3f2d8c: corrupt persisted proof state is discarded instead of permanently blocking reconciliation, empty state removes the Keychain entry, and the frequent refresh path returns before calling Paykit when there is nothing to reconcile. The full payment-proof suite passes 22/22 on the restacked subscriptions head.

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from c3f2d8c to 281b865CompareAugust 31, 2026 18:30
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up after the final cleanup: the hardening commit is now 281b8654 (signed). I removed the unnecessary decoder-only test hook while keeping the meaningful regression that proves empty reconciliation skips the Paykit SDK. PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests: 21/21 passing.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI note: the remaining pubky_paykit red check is test-harness instability rather than a proof-code failure. Its three internal attempts failed at Appium session creation, waiting for the generic send slider, and teardown/profile cleanup respectively; the final attempt had already dragged the send slider successfully. The same Paykit staging scenario passes on stacked PR #685 with this exact proof implementation. GitHub currently refuses an isolated rerun because this workflow’s unrelated local E2E job is still queued; I will rerun the failed job once the workflow finishes.

ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@jvsena42jvsena42 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found some points that worth a double check

Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
jvsena42

This comment was marked as resolved.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jvsena42 Fixed in e66771b. The Payment Request card now uses the shared expanded CustomButton layout in this PR, so the Figma button sizing fix is no longer deferred to #685. The proof delivery comments are also addressed in this head and replied to inline.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The requested proof lifecycle and Payment Request button fixes are now on the signed e66771b head, all inline threads are resolved, and the focused proof tests pass. @jvsena42 and @ovitrif please re-review when the current E2E run finishes.

@piotr-iohk

piotr-iohk commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Retested latest revision, iPhone 17 sim ↔ Pixel emu (same session as android #1178).

Amount edit on pay (iOS only)
Paying an incoming request opens the amount pad on iOS. Android goes straight to Confirm and the amount is locked. I changed 1000 → 1009 and swipe failed with Payment failed: amountMismatch (SendConfirmationView.performPayment). Confirm already blocks the amount tap when incomingPaymentRequest is set; looks like the first route still lands on .amount when the opened LN invoice amount is 0.

Recording:

Screen.Recording.2026-09-01.at.16.08.22.mov

Request lists don’t match
Same session, both on TODAY:

  • iOS: 3× 1000 + 26 000 (no 25 000)
  • Android: 2× 1000 + 26 000 + 25 000

Not amount-keyed overwrite in the app list — IDs are paymentRequestId + counterparty + path. The 25k did land: Android sent it on-chain, iOS activity shows +25 000 (81eaa51b…). It’s missing as an iOS request-history row. Extra 1k on iOS / missing 1k on Android looks like the same thing. Hypothesis: after fulfill, one side drops the row when localRole is missing/unknown (history mapping skips those). Avatars A vs I are just the contact names.

Screenshot (Payment Requests list):
Screenshot 2026-09-01 at 16 12 09

Logs:
bitkit_logs_2026-09-01_14-14-42.zip

Proofs still queued on the successful pays (LN + on-chain both ways). Amount pad / list drift look like follow-ups, not a proofs blocker.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ben-kaufman@piotr-iohk@ovitrif@jvsena42
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' feat: send paykit payment proofs by ben-kaufman · Pull Request #683 · synonymdev/bitkit-ios · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: send paykit payment proofs - #683

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs
Open

feat: send paykit payment proofs#683
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends a Paykit payment proof back to the requester after Bitkit successfully pays an incoming private payment request.

Description

  1. Persists the payer identity, request, and selected endpoint before request acceptance, then associates the Lightning payment hash before sending so restart recovery keeps the correct correlation.
  2. Persists successful on-chain transaction IDs and validated Lightning preimages before submitting them against the original one-time request and exact endpoint.
  3. Uses Paykit's durable private outbox, retries incomplete submissions during normal request refresh, and suppresses duplicate proofs already recorded by the SDK.
  4. Preserves earlier in-flight correlations across retries, clears the request after one proof is queued, and reads the secure store directly so wallet wipes cannot resurrect cached proof state.
  5. Attempts immediate SDK delivery if persisting a completed proof fails, without adding any user-facing UI.

This PR is stacked on #676. Companion Android PR: synonymdev/bitkit-android#1178

Linked Issues/Tasks

N/A

Screenshot / Video

N/A — there are no UI changes.

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. iOS → create a private request for Android → Android receives and pays on regtest: iOS records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.
  • 2. Android → create a private request for iOS → iOS receives and pays on regtest: Android records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.

Automated Checks

  • PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests.swift: 8 tests cover restart retry, duplicate suppression, invalid Lightning preimage rejection, failed-payment cleanup, exact on-chain proof submission, overlapping retries, wallet-store clearing, and completed-proof persistence failure.
  • Focused iOS proof tests passed: 8 tests, 0 failures.
  • Final iOS simulator Debug test build passed.
  • SwiftFormat and git diff --check passed.

@greptile-apps

This comment has been minimized.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift Outdated
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from 8801387 to c5d04c7CompareAugust 24, 2026 18:33

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On-chain payment proofs cannot recover after a store-load failure, so a successful send can still leave the requester without proof.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift
Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-request-ui to masterAugust 25, 2026 17:02
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 25, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

QA Notes

Ran on iPhone 17 Pro simulator and Pixel_9a emulator on regtest.

  • iOS created a private request for Android, Android paid, and iOS recorded the proof against that request.
  • Android created a private request for iOS, iOS paid, and Android recorded the proof against that request.

Approve.

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2026
12 tasks
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch 2 times, most recently from 01c4164 to bcf1d8aCompareAugust 31, 2026 14:25
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added the cross-platform proof-state hardening in c3f2d8c: corrupt persisted proof state is discarded instead of permanently blocking reconciliation, empty state removes the Keychain entry, and the frequent refresh path returns before calling Paykit when there is nothing to reconcile. The full payment-proof suite passes 22/22 on the restacked subscriptions head.

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from c3f2d8c to 281b865CompareAugust 31, 2026 18:30
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up after the final cleanup: the hardening commit is now 281b8654 (signed). I removed the unnecessary decoder-only test hook while keeping the meaningful regression that proves empty reconciliation skips the Paykit SDK. PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests: 21/21 passing.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI note: the remaining pubky_paykit red check is test-harness instability rather than a proof-code failure. Its three internal attempts failed at Appium session creation, waiting for the generic send slider, and teardown/profile cleanup respectively; the final attempt had already dragged the send slider successfully. The same Paykit staging scenario passes on stacked PR #685 with this exact proof implementation. GitHub currently refuses an isolated rerun because this workflow’s unrelated local E2E job is still queued; I will rerun the failed job once the workflow finishes.

ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@jvsena42jvsena42 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found some points that worth a double check

Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
jvsena42

This comment was marked as resolved.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jvsena42 Fixed in e66771b. The Payment Request card now uses the shared expanded CustomButton layout in this PR, so the Figma button sizing fix is no longer deferred to #685. The proof delivery comments are also addressed in this head and replied to inline.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The requested proof lifecycle and Payment Request button fixes are now on the signed e66771b head, all inline threads are resolved, and the focused proof tests pass. @jvsena42 and @ovitrif please re-review when the current E2E run finishes.

@piotr-iohk

piotr-iohk commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Retested latest revision, iPhone 17 sim ↔ Pixel emu (same session as android #1178).

Amount edit on pay (iOS only)
Paying an incoming request opens the amount pad on iOS. Android goes straight to Confirm and the amount is locked. I changed 1000 → 1009 and swipe failed with Payment failed: amountMismatch (SendConfirmationView.performPayment). Confirm already blocks the amount tap when incomingPaymentRequest is set; looks like the first route still lands on .amount when the opened LN invoice amount is 0.

Recording:

Screen.Recording.2026-09-01.at.16.08.22.mov

Request lists don’t match
Same session, both on TODAY:

  • iOS: 3× 1000 + 26 000 (no 25 000)
  • Android: 2× 1000 + 26 000 + 25 000

Not amount-keyed overwrite in the app list — IDs are paymentRequestId + counterparty + path. The 25k did land: Android sent it on-chain, iOS activity shows +25 000 (81eaa51b…). It’s missing as an iOS request-history row. Extra 1k on iOS / missing 1k on Android looks like the same thing. Hypothesis: after fulfill, one side drops the row when localRole is missing/unknown (history mapping skips those). Avatars A vs I are just the contact names.

Screenshot (Payment Requests list):
Screenshot 2026-09-01 at 16 12 09

Logs:
bitkit_logs_2026-09-01_14-14-42.zip

Proofs still queued on the successful pays (LN + on-chain both ways). Amount pad / list drift look like follow-ups, not a proofs blocker.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ben-kaufman@piotr-iohk@ovitrif@jvsena42
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); feat: send paykit payment proofs by ben-kaufman · Pull Request #683 · synonymdev/bitkit-ios · GitHub
Skip to content

feat: send paykit payment proofs - #683

Open
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs
Open

feat: send paykit payment proofs#683
ben-kaufman wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
codex/paykit-payment-proofs

Conversation

@ben-kaufman

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR sends a Paykit payment proof back to the requester after Bitkit successfully pays an incoming private payment request.

Description

  1. Persists the payer identity, request, and selected endpoint before request acceptance, then associates the Lightning payment hash before sending so restart recovery keeps the correct correlation.
  2. Persists successful on-chain transaction IDs and validated Lightning preimages before submitting them against the original one-time request and exact endpoint.
  3. Uses Paykit's durable private outbox, retries incomplete submissions during normal request refresh, and suppresses duplicate proofs already recorded by the SDK.
  4. Preserves earlier in-flight correlations across retries, clears the request after one proof is queued, and reads the secure store directly so wallet wipes cannot resurrect cached proof state.
  5. Attempts immediate SDK delivery if persisting a completed proof fails, without adding any user-facing UI.

This PR is stacked on #676. Companion Android PR: synonymdev/bitkit-android#1178

Linked Issues/Tasks

N/A

Screenshot / Video

N/A — there are no UI changes.

QA Notes

Manual Tests

  • 1. iOS → create a private request for Android → Android receives and pays on regtest: iOS records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.
  • 2. Android → create a private request for iOS → iOS receives and pays on regtest: Android records the proof against the exact request, endpoint, and transaction ID.

Automated Checks

  • PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests.swift: 8 tests cover restart retry, duplicate suppression, invalid Lightning preimage rejection, failed-payment cleanup, exact on-chain proof submission, overlapping retries, wallet-store clearing, and completed-proof persistence failure.
  • Focused iOS proof tests passed: 8 tests, 0 failures.
  • Final iOS simulator Debug test build passed.
  • SwiftFormat and git diff --check passed.

@greptile-apps

This comment has been minimized.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift Outdated
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from 8801387 to c5d04c7CompareAugust 24, 2026 18:33

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On-chain payment proofs cannot recover after a store-load failure, so a successful send can still leave the requester without proof.

Comment threadBitkit/Services/PaykitPaymentProofService.swift
Base automatically changed from codex/paykit-payment-request-ui to masterAugust 25, 2026 17:02
ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 25, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

QA Notes

Ran on iPhone 17 Pro simulator and Pixel_9a emulator on regtest.

  • iOS created a private request for Android, Android paid, and iOS recorded the proof against that request.
  • Android created a private request for iOS, iOS paid, and Android recorded the proof against that request.

Approve.

@ben-kaufmanben-kaufman mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2026
12 tasks
@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch 2 times, most recently from 01c4164 to bcf1d8aCompareAugust 31, 2026 14:25
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added the cross-platform proof-state hardening in c3f2d8c: corrupt persisted proof state is discarded instead of permanently blocking reconciliation, empty state removes the Keychain entry, and the frequent refresh path returns before calling Paykit when there is nothing to reconcile. The full payment-proof suite passes 22/22 on the restacked subscriptions head.

@ben-kaufman
ben-kaufmanforce-pushed the codex/paykit-payment-proofs branch from c3f2d8c to 281b865CompareAugust 31, 2026 18:30
@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Follow-up after the final cleanup: the hardening commit is now 281b8654 (signed). I removed the unnecessary decoder-only test hook while keeping the meaningful regression that proves empty reconciliation skips the Paykit SDK. PaykitPaymentProofServiceTests: 21/21 passing.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI note: the remaining pubky_paykit red check is test-harness instability rather than a proof-code failure. Its three internal attempts failed at Appium session creation, waiting for the generic send slider, and teardown/profile cleanup respectively; the final attempt had already dragged the send slider successfully. The same Paykit staging scenario passes on stacked PR #685 with this exact proof implementation. GitHub currently refuses an isolated rerun because this workflow’s unrelated local E2E job is still queued; I will rerun the failed job once the workflow finishes.

ovitrif
ovitrif previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2026

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@jvsena42jvsena42 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found some points that worth a double check

Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
Comment threadBitkit/Views/Wallets/Send/SendConfirmationView.swift
jvsena42

This comment was marked as resolved.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@jvsena42 Fixed in e66771b. The Payment Request card now uses the shared expanded CustomButton layout in this PR, so the Figma button sizing fix is no longer deferred to #685. The proof delivery comments are also addressed in this head and replied to inline.

@ben-kaufman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The requested proof lifecycle and Payment Request button fixes are now on the signed e66771b head, all inline threads are resolved, and the focused proof tests pass. @jvsena42 and @ovitrif please re-review when the current E2E run finishes.

@piotr-iohk

piotr-iohk commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Retested latest revision, iPhone 17 sim ↔ Pixel emu (same session as android #1178).

Amount edit on pay (iOS only)
Paying an incoming request opens the amount pad on iOS. Android goes straight to Confirm and the amount is locked. I changed 1000 → 1009 and swipe failed with Payment failed: amountMismatch (SendConfirmationView.performPayment). Confirm already blocks the amount tap when incomingPaymentRequest is set; looks like the first route still lands on .amount when the opened LN invoice amount is 0.

Recording:

Screen.Recording.2026-09-01.at.16.08.22.mov

Request lists don’t match
Same session, both on TODAY:

  • iOS: 3× 1000 + 26 000 (no 25 000)
  • Android: 2× 1000 + 26 000 + 25 000

Not amount-keyed overwrite in the app list — IDs are paymentRequestId + counterparty + path. The 25k did land: Android sent it on-chain, iOS activity shows +25 000 (81eaa51b…). It’s missing as an iOS request-history row. Extra 1k on iOS / missing 1k on Android looks like the same thing. Hypothesis: after fulfill, one side drops the row when localRole is missing/unknown (history mapping skips those). Avatars A vs I are just the contact names.

Screenshot (Payment Requests list):
Screenshot 2026-09-01 at 16 12 09

Logs:
bitkit_logs_2026-09-01_14-14-42.zip

Proofs still queued on the successful pays (LN + on-chain both ways). Amount pad / list drift look like follow-ups, not a proofs blocker.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ben-kaufman@piotr-iohk@ovitrif@jvsena42