fix(test): metering test used the renamed tool (await_next → await_event) — main was red

[drewstone]

main has 2 failing tests in driver-inference-metering.test.ts — this fixes them.

Root cause

#318 renamed the coordination wait verb await_next → await_event. #319's metering test (merged around the same time) still scripted await_next. Since the tool no longer exists, the scripted driver's 'collect the worker' turn got {error:'unknown tool: await_next'}, the worker was never drained, and the two winner-expecting tests returned no-winner → failed.

The driver itself is fine — it fails loud (byName.get(name) → {error:'unknown tool: …'}, folded back to the LLM). A real LLM would recover by calling await_event; only the fixed test script couldn't. So this is purely a stale test literal.

Fix

All 6 await_next refs → await_event. Swept the whole repo — no stale await_next remains in src/tests/bench/docs/skills.

Verification

• the file: 9/9 pass (was 7/9)
• full suite 1030 pass, 0 failing (main was red at 2)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[tangletools]

✅ Auto-approved PR — 933d5f39

Blanket team auto-approval is enabled for this reviewer service.
The full PR reviewer audit still runs separately and will publish findings if it detects issues.

_{tangletools · auto-approval · reason: blanket_auto_approve · 2026-06-17T10:26:42Z}

[tangletools]

🟢 Value Audit — sound

Verdict	sound
Concerns	0 (none)
Heuristic	0.0s
Duplication	0.0s
Interrogation	154.5s (2 bridge agents)
Total	154.5s

💰 Value — sound

Replaces six stale await_next literals in a single test file with the current await_event tool name so the scripted driver can drain workers again and the metering tests pass.

• What it does: In tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts it changes every occurrence of the obsolete coordination tool name await_next to await_event in the scripted meteredChat turns and in the observability assertion (6 replacements total).
• Goals it achieves: Restores the two failing winner-expecting tests by making the scripted driver call a tool that actually exists, so the worker settlement is drained and the tests return winner instead of no-winner; also brings the test file into line with the post-#318 coordination toolbox vocabulary.
• Assessment: Good. The change is minimal, surgical, and exactly matches the codebase's current grain: await_event is the single canonical wait verb defined in src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 and used throughout tests, docs, and skills. The PR author also swept the repo and confirmed no stale await_next remains.
• Better / existing approach: none — this is the right approach. Adding a backwards-compatibility alias for await_next would fight the codebase's one-verb design and create unnecessary maintenance surface.
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":1,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

🎯 Usefulness — sound

Restores a stale test script to the live coordination-verb surface; no new API, no dead code, no competing pattern.

• Integration: The change replaces stale await_next literals with await_event in tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts so the scripted driver-LLM calls a tool that actually exists. The real tool is registered at src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 as name: 'await_event'. A repo-wide grep for await_next returned no matches, so no stale references remain. await_event is already reachable across
• Fit with existing patterns: It fits the established pattern exactly. The coordination driver exposes the verbs spawn_worker, await_event, observe_worker, steer_worker, stop over a live scope, and the production prompt in src/runtime/supervise/authoring.ts:56 already instructs the driver to use await_event (kinds:['settled']). The test was just out of sync after the rename in #318; the fix brings it back into th
• Real-world viability: The runtime behavior is unchanged; the driver already handles unknown tools correctly by folding {error: 'unknown tool: ...'} back to the LLM (src/runtime/supervise/coordination-driver.ts:200-203), which a real LLM would recover from. The fixed test now correctly drains spawned workers via the valid tool and asserts on the real metering, nested re-homing, crash recovery, budget bounds, and obs
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":2,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

No concerns — sound change, no better or existing approach found. ✅

---

What this audit checks

It judges the change on its merits — not whether it was tasked out in an issue. Unticketed, fast-moving work is fine; the question is whether the change is good and whether a better or existing approach should be used instead.

Pass	What it asks
Heuristic	Vague title? Whitespace-only or cruft-bearing diff? (content signals only)
Duplication	Do added function/class names already exist elsewhere in the repo?
Value Audit	What does it do? What goal does it achieve? Is it good? Better architecture or already-exists?
Usefulness Audit	Does it integrate and fit? Will it hold up in real use and actually get used?

Findings are concerns, not blocks — the human reviewer decides what to do with them.

_{value-audit · 20260617T103131Z}

[tangletools]

✅ No Blockers — 933d5f39

Readiness 95/100 · Confidence 65/100 · 0 findings (none)

	deepseek	glm	aggregate
Readiness	95	95	95
Confidence	65	65	65
Correctness	95	95	95
Security	95	95	95
Testing	95	95	95
Architecture	95	95	95

Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision. | Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision.

No findings.

---

_{tangletools · 2026-06-17T10:33:00Z · trace}

[drewstone]

main has 2 failing tests in driver-inference-metering.test.ts — this fixes them.

Root cause

#318 renamed the coordination wait verb await_next → await_event. #319's metering test (merged around the same time) still scripted await_next. Since the tool no longer exists, the scripted driver's 'collect the worker' turn got {error:'unknown tool: await_next'}, the worker was never drained, and the two winner-expecting tests returned no-winner → failed.

The driver itself is fine — it fails loud (byName.get(name) → {error:'unknown tool: …'}, folded back to the LLM). A real LLM would recover by calling await_event; only the fixed test script couldn't. So this is purely a stale test literal.

Fix

All 6 await_next refs → await_event. Swept the whole repo — no stale await_next remains in src/tests/bench/docs/skills.

Verification

• the file: 9/9 pass (was 7/9)
• full suite 1030 pass, 0 failing (main was red at 2)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[tangletools]

✅ Auto-approved PR — 933d5f39

Blanket team auto-approval is enabled for this reviewer service.
The full PR reviewer audit still runs separately and will publish findings if it detects issues.

_{tangletools · auto-approval · reason: blanket_auto_approve · 2026-06-17T10:26:42Z}

[tangletools]

🟢 Value Audit — sound

Verdict	sound
Concerns	0 (none)
Heuristic	0.0s
Duplication	0.0s
Interrogation	154.5s (2 bridge agents)
Total	154.5s

💰 Value — sound

Replaces six stale await_next literals in a single test file with the current await_event tool name so the scripted driver can drain workers again and the metering tests pass.

• What it does: In tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts it changes every occurrence of the obsolete coordination tool name await_next to await_event in the scripted meteredChat turns and in the observability assertion (6 replacements total).
• Goals it achieves: Restores the two failing winner-expecting tests by making the scripted driver call a tool that actually exists, so the worker settlement is drained and the tests return winner instead of no-winner; also brings the test file into line with the post-#318 coordination toolbox vocabulary.
• Assessment: Good. The change is minimal, surgical, and exactly matches the codebase's current grain: await_event is the single canonical wait verb defined in src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 and used throughout tests, docs, and skills. The PR author also swept the repo and confirmed no stale await_next remains.
• Better / existing approach: none — this is the right approach. Adding a backwards-compatibility alias for await_next would fight the codebase's one-verb design and create unnecessary maintenance surface.
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":1,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

🎯 Usefulness — sound

Restores a stale test script to the live coordination-verb surface; no new API, no dead code, no competing pattern.

• Integration: The change replaces stale await_next literals with await_event in tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts so the scripted driver-LLM calls a tool that actually exists. The real tool is registered at src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 as name: 'await_event'. A repo-wide grep for await_next returned no matches, so no stale references remain. await_event is already reachable across
• Fit with existing patterns: It fits the established pattern exactly. The coordination driver exposes the verbs spawn_worker, await_event, observe_worker, steer_worker, stop over a live scope, and the production prompt in src/runtime/supervise/authoring.ts:56 already instructs the driver to use await_event (kinds:['settled']). The test was just out of sync after the rename in #318; the fix brings it back into th
• Real-world viability: The runtime behavior is unchanged; the driver already handles unknown tools correctly by folding {error: 'unknown tool: ...'} back to the LLM (src/runtime/supervise/coordination-driver.ts:200-203), which a real LLM would recover from. The fixed test now correctly drains spawned workers via the valid tool and asserts on the real metering, nested re-homing, crash recovery, budget bounds, and obs
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":2,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

No concerns — sound change, no better or existing approach found. ✅

---

What this audit checks

It judges the change on its merits — not whether it was tasked out in an issue. Unticketed, fast-moving work is fine; the question is whether the change is good and whether a better or existing approach should be used instead.

Pass	What it asks
Heuristic	Vague title? Whitespace-only or cruft-bearing diff? (content signals only)
Duplication	Do added function/class names already exist elsewhere in the repo?
Value Audit	What does it do? What goal does it achieve? Is it good? Better architecture or already-exists?
Usefulness Audit	Does it integrate and fit? Will it hold up in real use and actually get used?

Findings are concerns, not blocks — the human reviewer decides what to do with them.

_{value-audit · 20260617T103131Z}

[tangletools]

✅ No Blockers — 933d5f39

Readiness 95/100 · Confidence 65/100 · 0 findings (none)

	deepseek	glm	aggregate
Readiness	95	95	95
Confidence	65	65	65
Correctness	95	95	95
Security	95	95	95
Testing	95	95	95
Architecture	95	95	95

Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision. | Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision.

No findings.

---

_{tangletools · 2026-06-17T10:33:00Z · trace}

[drewstone]

main has 2 failing tests in driver-inference-metering.test.ts — this fixes them.

Root cause

#318 renamed the coordination wait verb await_next → await_event. #319's metering test (merged around the same time) still scripted await_next. Since the tool no longer exists, the scripted driver's 'collect the worker' turn got {error:'unknown tool: await_next'}, the worker was never drained, and the two winner-expecting tests returned no-winner → failed.

The driver itself is fine — it fails loud (byName.get(name) → {error:'unknown tool: …'}, folded back to the LLM). A real LLM would recover by calling await_event; only the fixed test script couldn't. So this is purely a stale test literal.

Fix

All 6 await_next refs → await_event. Swept the whole repo — no stale await_next remains in src/tests/bench/docs/skills.

Verification

• the file: 9/9 pass (was 7/9)
• full suite 1030 pass, 0 failing (main was red at 2)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[tangletools]

✅ Auto-approved PR — 933d5f39

Blanket team auto-approval is enabled for this reviewer service.
The full PR reviewer audit still runs separately and will publish findings if it detects issues.

_{tangletools · auto-approval · reason: blanket_auto_approve · 2026-06-17T10:26:42Z}

[tangletools]

🟢 Value Audit — sound

Verdict	sound
Concerns	0 (none)
Heuristic	0.0s
Duplication	0.0s
Interrogation	154.5s (2 bridge agents)
Total	154.5s

💰 Value — sound

Replaces six stale await_next literals in a single test file with the current await_event tool name so the scripted driver can drain workers again and the metering tests pass.

• What it does: In tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts it changes every occurrence of the obsolete coordination tool name await_next to await_event in the scripted meteredChat turns and in the observability assertion (6 replacements total).
• Goals it achieves: Restores the two failing winner-expecting tests by making the scripted driver call a tool that actually exists, so the worker settlement is drained and the tests return winner instead of no-winner; also brings the test file into line with the post-#318 coordination toolbox vocabulary.
• Assessment: Good. The change is minimal, surgical, and exactly matches the codebase's current grain: await_event is the single canonical wait verb defined in src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 and used throughout tests, docs, and skills. The PR author also swept the repo and confirmed no stale await_next remains.
• Better / existing approach: none — this is the right approach. Adding a backwards-compatibility alias for await_next would fight the codebase's one-verb design and create unnecessary maintenance surface.
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":1,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

🎯 Usefulness — sound

Restores a stale test script to the live coordination-verb surface; no new API, no dead code, no competing pattern.

• Integration: The change replaces stale await_next literals with await_event in tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts so the scripted driver-LLM calls a tool that actually exists. The real tool is registered at src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 as name: 'await_event'. A repo-wide grep for await_next returned no matches, so no stale references remain. await_event is already reachable across
• Fit with existing patterns: It fits the established pattern exactly. The coordination driver exposes the verbs spawn_worker, await_event, observe_worker, steer_worker, stop over a live scope, and the production prompt in src/runtime/supervise/authoring.ts:56 already instructs the driver to use await_event (kinds:['settled']). The test was just out of sync after the rename in #318; the fix brings it back into th
• Real-world viability: The runtime behavior is unchanged; the driver already handles unknown tools correctly by folding {error: 'unknown tool: ...'} back to the LLM (src/runtime/supervise/coordination-driver.ts:200-203), which a real LLM would recover from. The fixed test now correctly drains spawned workers via the valid tool and asserts on the real metering, nested re-homing, crash recovery, budget bounds, and obs
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":2,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

No concerns — sound change, no better or existing approach found. ✅

---

What this audit checks

It judges the change on its merits — not whether it was tasked out in an issue. Unticketed, fast-moving work is fine; the question is whether the change is good and whether a better or existing approach should be used instead.

Pass	What it asks
Heuristic	Vague title? Whitespace-only or cruft-bearing diff? (content signals only)
Duplication	Do added function/class names already exist elsewhere in the repo?
Value Audit	What does it do? What goal does it achieve? Is it good? Better architecture or already-exists?
Usefulness Audit	Does it integrate and fit? Will it hold up in real use and actually get used?

Findings are concerns, not blocks — the human reviewer decides what to do with them.

_{value-audit · 20260617T103131Z}

[tangletools]

✅ No Blockers — 933d5f39

Readiness 95/100 · Confidence 65/100 · 0 findings (none)

	deepseek	glm	aggregate
Readiness	95	95	95
Confidence	65	65	65
Correctness	95	95	95
Security	95	95	95
Testing	95	95	95
Architecture	95	95	95

Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision. | Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision.

No findings.

---

_{tangletools · 2026-06-17T10:33:00Z · trace}

[drewstone]

main has 2 failing tests in driver-inference-metering.test.ts — this fixes them.

Root cause

#318 renamed the coordination wait verb await_next → await_event. #319's metering test (merged around the same time) still scripted await_next. Since the tool no longer exists, the scripted driver's 'collect the worker' turn got {error:'unknown tool: await_next'}, the worker was never drained, and the two winner-expecting tests returned no-winner → failed.

The driver itself is fine — it fails loud (byName.get(name) → {error:'unknown tool: …'}, folded back to the LLM). A real LLM would recover by calling await_event; only the fixed test script couldn't. So this is purely a stale test literal.

Fix

All 6 await_next refs → await_event. Swept the whole repo — no stale await_next remains in src/tests/bench/docs/skills.

Verification

• the file: 9/9 pass (was 7/9)
• full suite 1030 pass, 0 failing (main was red at 2)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[tangletools]

✅ Auto-approved PR — 933d5f39

Blanket team auto-approval is enabled for this reviewer service.
The full PR reviewer audit still runs separately and will publish findings if it detects issues.

_{tangletools · auto-approval · reason: blanket_auto_approve · 2026-06-17T10:26:42Z}

[tangletools]

🟢 Value Audit — sound

Verdict	sound
Concerns	0 (none)
Heuristic	0.0s
Duplication	0.0s
Interrogation	154.5s (2 bridge agents)
Total	154.5s

💰 Value — sound

Replaces six stale await_next literals in a single test file with the current await_event tool name so the scripted driver can drain workers again and the metering tests pass.

• What it does: In tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts it changes every occurrence of the obsolete coordination tool name await_next to await_event in the scripted meteredChat turns and in the observability assertion (6 replacements total).
• Goals it achieves: Restores the two failing winner-expecting tests by making the scripted driver call a tool that actually exists, so the worker settlement is drained and the tests return winner instead of no-winner; also brings the test file into line with the post-#318 coordination toolbox vocabulary.
• Assessment: Good. The change is minimal, surgical, and exactly matches the codebase's current grain: await_event is the single canonical wait verb defined in src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 and used throughout tests, docs, and skills. The PR author also swept the repo and confirmed no stale await_next remains.
• Better / existing approach: none — this is the right approach. Adding a backwards-compatibility alias for await_next would fight the codebase's one-verb design and create unnecessary maintenance surface.
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":1,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

🎯 Usefulness — sound

Restores a stale test script to the live coordination-verb surface; no new API, no dead code, no competing pattern.

• Integration: The change replaces stale await_next literals with await_event in tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts so the scripted driver-LLM calls a tool that actually exists. The real tool is registered at src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 as name: 'await_event'. A repo-wide grep for await_next returned no matches, so no stale references remain. await_event is already reachable across
• Fit with existing patterns: It fits the established pattern exactly. The coordination driver exposes the verbs spawn_worker, await_event, observe_worker, steer_worker, stop over a live scope, and the production prompt in src/runtime/supervise/authoring.ts:56 already instructs the driver to use await_event (kinds:['settled']). The test was just out of sync after the rename in #318; the fix brings it back into th
• Real-world viability: The runtime behavior is unchanged; the driver already handles unknown tools correctly by folding {error: 'unknown tool: ...'} back to the LLM (src/runtime/supervise/coordination-driver.ts:200-203), which a real LLM would recover from. The fixed test now correctly drains spawned workers via the valid tool and asserts on the real metering, nested re-homing, crash recovery, budget bounds, and obs
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":2,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

No concerns — sound change, no better or existing approach found. ✅

---

What this audit checks

It judges the change on its merits — not whether it was tasked out in an issue. Unticketed, fast-moving work is fine; the question is whether the change is good and whether a better or existing approach should be used instead.

Pass	What it asks
Heuristic	Vague title? Whitespace-only or cruft-bearing diff? (content signals only)
Duplication	Do added function/class names already exist elsewhere in the repo?
Value Audit	What does it do? What goal does it achieve? Is it good? Better architecture or already-exists?
Usefulness Audit	Does it integrate and fit? Will it hold up in real use and actually get used?

Findings are concerns, not blocks — the human reviewer decides what to do with them.

_{value-audit · 20260617T103131Z}

[tangletools]

✅ No Blockers — 933d5f39

Readiness 95/100 · Confidence 65/100 · 0 findings (none)

	deepseek	glm	aggregate
Readiness	95	95	95
Confidence	65	65	65
Correctness	95	95	95
Security	95	95	95
Testing	95	95	95
Architecture	95	95	95

Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision. | Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision.

No findings.

---

_{tangletools · 2026-06-17T10:33:00Z · trace}

[drewstone]

main has 2 failing tests in driver-inference-metering.test.ts — this fixes them.

Root cause

#318 renamed the coordination wait verb await_next → await_event. #319's metering test (merged around the same time) still scripted await_next. Since the tool no longer exists, the scripted driver's 'collect the worker' turn got {error:'unknown tool: await_next'}, the worker was never drained, and the two winner-expecting tests returned no-winner → failed.

The driver itself is fine — it fails loud (byName.get(name) → {error:'unknown tool: …'}, folded back to the LLM). A real LLM would recover by calling await_event; only the fixed test script couldn't. So this is purely a stale test literal.

Fix

All 6 await_next refs → await_event. Swept the whole repo — no stale await_next remains in src/tests/bench/docs/skills.

Verification

• the file: 9/9 pass (was 7/9)
• full suite 1030 pass, 0 failing (main was red at 2)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[tangletools]

✅ Auto-approved PR — 933d5f39

Blanket team auto-approval is enabled for this reviewer service.
The full PR reviewer audit still runs separately and will publish findings if it detects issues.

_{tangletools · auto-approval · reason: blanket_auto_approve · 2026-06-17T10:26:42Z}

[tangletools]

🟢 Value Audit — sound

Verdict	sound
Concerns	0 (none)
Heuristic	0.0s
Duplication	0.0s
Interrogation	154.5s (2 bridge agents)
Total	154.5s

💰 Value — sound

Replaces six stale await_next literals in a single test file with the current await_event tool name so the scripted driver can drain workers again and the metering tests pass.

• What it does: In tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts it changes every occurrence of the obsolete coordination tool name await_next to await_event in the scripted meteredChat turns and in the observability assertion (6 replacements total).
• Goals it achieves: Restores the two failing winner-expecting tests by making the scripted driver call a tool that actually exists, so the worker settlement is drained and the tests return winner instead of no-winner; also brings the test file into line with the post-#318 coordination toolbox vocabulary.
• Assessment: Good. The change is minimal, surgical, and exactly matches the codebase's current grain: await_event is the single canonical wait verb defined in src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 and used throughout tests, docs, and skills. The PR author also swept the repo and confirmed no stale await_next remains.
• Better / existing approach: none — this is the right approach. Adding a backwards-compatibility alias for await_next would fight the codebase's one-verb design and create unnecessary maintenance surface.
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":1,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

🎯 Usefulness — sound

Restores a stale test script to the live coordination-verb surface; no new API, no dead code, no competing pattern.

• Integration: The change replaces stale await_next literals with await_event in tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts so the scripted driver-LLM calls a tool that actually exists. The real tool is registered at src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 as name: 'await_event'. A repo-wide grep for await_next returned no matches, so no stale references remain. await_event is already reachable across
• Fit with existing patterns: It fits the established pattern exactly. The coordination driver exposes the verbs spawn_worker, await_event, observe_worker, steer_worker, stop over a live scope, and the production prompt in src/runtime/supervise/authoring.ts:56 already instructs the driver to use await_event (kinds:['settled']). The test was just out of sync after the rename in #318; the fix brings it back into th
• Real-world viability: The runtime behavior is unchanged; the driver already handles unknown tools correctly by folding {error: 'unknown tool: ...'} back to the LLM (src/runtime/supervise/coordination-driver.ts:200-203), which a real LLM would recover from. The fixed test now correctly drains spawned workers via the valid tool and asserts on the real metering, nested re-homing, crash recovery, budget bounds, and obs
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":2,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

No concerns — sound change, no better or existing approach found. ✅

---

What this audit checks

It judges the change on its merits — not whether it was tasked out in an issue. Unticketed, fast-moving work is fine; the question is whether the change is good and whether a better or existing approach should be used instead.

Pass	What it asks
Heuristic	Vague title? Whitespace-only or cruft-bearing diff? (content signals only)
Duplication	Do added function/class names already exist elsewhere in the repo?
Value Audit	What does it do? What goal does it achieve? Is it good? Better architecture or already-exists?
Usefulness Audit	Does it integrate and fit? Will it hold up in real use and actually get used?

Findings are concerns, not blocks — the human reviewer decides what to do with them.

_{value-audit · 20260617T103131Z}

[tangletools]

✅ No Blockers — 933d5f39

Readiness 95/100 · Confidence 65/100 · 0 findings (none)

	deepseek	glm	aggregate
Readiness	95	95	95
Confidence	65	65	65
Correctness	95	95	95
Security	95	95	95
Testing	95	95	95
Architecture	95	95	95

Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision. | Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision.

No findings.

---

_{tangletools · 2026-06-17T10:33:00Z · trace}

[drewstone]

main has 2 failing tests in driver-inference-metering.test.ts — this fixes them.

Root cause

#318 renamed the coordination wait verb await_next → await_event. #319's metering test (merged around the same time) still scripted await_next. Since the tool no longer exists, the scripted driver's 'collect the worker' turn got {error:'unknown tool: await_next'}, the worker was never drained, and the two winner-expecting tests returned no-winner → failed.

The driver itself is fine — it fails loud (byName.get(name) → {error:'unknown tool: …'}, folded back to the LLM). A real LLM would recover by calling await_event; only the fixed test script couldn't. So this is purely a stale test literal.

Fix

All 6 await_next refs → await_event. Swept the whole repo — no stale await_next remains in src/tests/bench/docs/skills.

Verification

• the file: 9/9 pass (was 7/9)
• full suite 1030 pass, 0 failing (main was red at 2)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[tangletools]

✅ Auto-approved PR — 933d5f39

Blanket team auto-approval is enabled for this reviewer service.
The full PR reviewer audit still runs separately and will publish findings if it detects issues.

_{tangletools · auto-approval · reason: blanket_auto_approve · 2026-06-17T10:26:42Z}

[tangletools]

🟢 Value Audit — sound

Verdict	sound
Concerns	0 (none)
Heuristic	0.0s
Duplication	0.0s
Interrogation	154.5s (2 bridge agents)
Total	154.5s

💰 Value — sound

Replaces six stale await_next literals in a single test file with the current await_event tool name so the scripted driver can drain workers again and the metering tests pass.

• What it does: In tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts it changes every occurrence of the obsolete coordination tool name await_next to await_event in the scripted meteredChat turns and in the observability assertion (6 replacements total).
• Goals it achieves: Restores the two failing winner-expecting tests by making the scripted driver call a tool that actually exists, so the worker settlement is drained and the tests return winner instead of no-winner; also brings the test file into line with the post-#318 coordination toolbox vocabulary.
• Assessment: Good. The change is minimal, surgical, and exactly matches the codebase's current grain: await_event is the single canonical wait verb defined in src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 and used throughout tests, docs, and skills. The PR author also swept the repo and confirmed no stale await_next remains.
• Better / existing approach: none — this is the right approach. Adding a backwards-compatibility alias for await_next would fight the codebase's one-verb design and create unnecessary maintenance surface.
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":1,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

🎯 Usefulness — sound

Restores a stale test script to the live coordination-verb surface; no new API, no dead code, no competing pattern.

• Integration: The change replaces stale await_next literals with await_event in tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts so the scripted driver-LLM calls a tool that actually exists. The real tool is registered at src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 as name: 'await_event'. A repo-wide grep for await_next returned no matches, so no stale references remain. await_event is already reachable across
• Fit with existing patterns: It fits the established pattern exactly. The coordination driver exposes the verbs spawn_worker, await_event, observe_worker, steer_worker, stop over a live scope, and the production prompt in src/runtime/supervise/authoring.ts:56 already instructs the driver to use await_event (kinds:['settled']). The test was just out of sync after the rename in #318; the fix brings it back into th
• Real-world viability: The runtime behavior is unchanged; the driver already handles unknown tools correctly by folding {error: 'unknown tool: ...'} back to the LLM (src/runtime/supervise/coordination-driver.ts:200-203), which a real LLM would recover from. The fixed test now correctly drains spawned workers via the valid tool and asserts on the real metering, nested re-homing, crash recovery, budget bounds, and obs
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":2,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

No concerns — sound change, no better or existing approach found. ✅

---

What this audit checks

It judges the change on its merits — not whether it was tasked out in an issue. Unticketed, fast-moving work is fine; the question is whether the change is good and whether a better or existing approach should be used instead.

Pass	What it asks
Heuristic	Vague title? Whitespace-only or cruft-bearing diff? (content signals only)
Duplication	Do added function/class names already exist elsewhere in the repo?
Value Audit	What does it do? What goal does it achieve? Is it good? Better architecture or already-exists?
Usefulness Audit	Does it integrate and fit? Will it hold up in real use and actually get used?

Findings are concerns, not blocks — the human reviewer decides what to do with them.

_{value-audit · 20260617T103131Z}

[tangletools]

✅ No Blockers — 933d5f39

Readiness 95/100 · Confidence 65/100 · 0 findings (none)

	deepseek	glm	aggregate
Readiness	95	95	95
Confidence	65	65	65
Correctness	95	95	95
Security	95	95	95
Testing	95	95	95
Architecture	95	95	95

Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision. | Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision.

No findings.

---

_{tangletools · 2026-06-17T10:33:00Z · trace}

[drewstone]

main has 2 failing tests in driver-inference-metering.test.ts — this fixes them.

Root cause

#318 renamed the coordination wait verb await_next → await_event. #319's metering test (merged around the same time) still scripted await_next. Since the tool no longer exists, the scripted driver's 'collect the worker' turn got {error:'unknown tool: await_next'}, the worker was never drained, and the two winner-expecting tests returned no-winner → failed.

The driver itself is fine — it fails loud (byName.get(name) → {error:'unknown tool: …'}, folded back to the LLM). A real LLM would recover by calling await_event; only the fixed test script couldn't. So this is purely a stale test literal.

Fix

All 6 await_next refs → await_event. Swept the whole repo — no stale await_next remains in src/tests/bench/docs/skills.

Verification

• the file: 9/9 pass (was 7/9)
• full suite 1030 pass, 0 failing (main was red at 2)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[tangletools]

✅ Auto-approved PR — 933d5f39

Blanket team auto-approval is enabled for this reviewer service.
The full PR reviewer audit still runs separately and will publish findings if it detects issues.

_{tangletools · auto-approval · reason: blanket_auto_approve · 2026-06-17T10:26:42Z}

[tangletools]

🟢 Value Audit — sound

Verdict	sound
Concerns	0 (none)
Heuristic	0.0s
Duplication	0.0s
Interrogation	154.5s (2 bridge agents)
Total	154.5s

💰 Value — sound

Replaces six stale await_next literals in a single test file with the current await_event tool name so the scripted driver can drain workers again and the metering tests pass.

• What it does: In tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts it changes every occurrence of the obsolete coordination tool name await_next to await_event in the scripted meteredChat turns and in the observability assertion (6 replacements total).
• Goals it achieves: Restores the two failing winner-expecting tests by making the scripted driver call a tool that actually exists, so the worker settlement is drained and the tests return winner instead of no-winner; also brings the test file into line with the post-#318 coordination toolbox vocabulary.
• Assessment: Good. The change is minimal, surgical, and exactly matches the codebase's current grain: await_event is the single canonical wait verb defined in src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 and used throughout tests, docs, and skills. The PR author also swept the repo and confirmed no stale await_next remains.
• Better / existing approach: none — this is the right approach. Adding a backwards-compatibility alias for await_next would fight the codebase's one-verb design and create unnecessary maintenance surface.
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":1,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

🎯 Usefulness — sound

Restores a stale test script to the live coordination-verb surface; no new API, no dead code, no competing pattern.

• Integration: The change replaces stale await_next literals with await_event in tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts so the scripted driver-LLM calls a tool that actually exists. The real tool is registered at src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 as name: 'await_event'. A repo-wide grep for await_next returned no matches, so no stale references remain. await_event is already reachable across
• Fit with existing patterns: It fits the established pattern exactly. The coordination driver exposes the verbs spawn_worker, await_event, observe_worker, steer_worker, stop over a live scope, and the production prompt in src/runtime/supervise/authoring.ts:56 already instructs the driver to use await_event (kinds:['settled']). The test was just out of sync after the rename in #318; the fix brings it back into th
• Real-world viability: The runtime behavior is unchanged; the driver already handles unknown tools correctly by folding {error: 'unknown tool: ...'} back to the LLM (src/runtime/supervise/coordination-driver.ts:200-203), which a real LLM would recover from. The fixed test now correctly drains spawned workers via the valid tool and asserts on the real metering, nested re-homing, crash recovery, budget bounds, and obs
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":2,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

No concerns — sound change, no better or existing approach found. ✅

---

What this audit checks

It judges the change on its merits — not whether it was tasked out in an issue. Unticketed, fast-moving work is fine; the question is whether the change is good and whether a better or existing approach should be used instead.

Pass	What it asks
Heuristic	Vague title? Whitespace-only or cruft-bearing diff? (content signals only)
Duplication	Do added function/class names already exist elsewhere in the repo?
Value Audit	What does it do? What goal does it achieve? Is it good? Better architecture or already-exists?
Usefulness Audit	Does it integrate and fit? Will it hold up in real use and actually get used?

Findings are concerns, not blocks — the human reviewer decides what to do with them.

_{value-audit · 20260617T103131Z}

[tangletools]

✅ No Blockers — 933d5f39

Readiness 95/100 · Confidence 65/100 · 0 findings (none)

	deepseek	glm	aggregate
Readiness	95	95	95
Confidence	65	65	65
Correctness	95	95	95
Security	95	95	95
Testing	95	95	95
Architecture	95	95	95

Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision. | Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision.

No findings.

---

_{tangletools · 2026-06-17T10:33:00Z · trace}

[drewstone]

main has 2 failing tests in driver-inference-metering.test.ts — this fixes them.

Root cause

#318 renamed the coordination wait verb await_next → await_event. #319's metering test (merged around the same time) still scripted await_next. Since the tool no longer exists, the scripted driver's 'collect the worker' turn got {error:'unknown tool: await_next'}, the worker was never drained, and the two winner-expecting tests returned no-winner → failed.

The driver itself is fine — it fails loud (byName.get(name) → {error:'unknown tool: …'}, folded back to the LLM). A real LLM would recover by calling await_event; only the fixed test script couldn't. So this is purely a stale test literal.

Fix

All 6 await_next refs → await_event. Swept the whole repo — no stale await_next remains in src/tests/bench/docs/skills.

Verification

• the file: 9/9 pass (was 7/9)
• full suite 1030 pass, 0 failing (main was red at 2)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[tangletools]

✅ Auto-approved PR — 933d5f39

Blanket team auto-approval is enabled for this reviewer service.
The full PR reviewer audit still runs separately and will publish findings if it detects issues.

_{tangletools · auto-approval · reason: blanket_auto_approve · 2026-06-17T10:26:42Z}

[tangletools]

🟢 Value Audit — sound

Verdict	sound
Concerns	0 (none)
Heuristic	0.0s
Duplication	0.0s
Interrogation	154.5s (2 bridge agents)
Total	154.5s

💰 Value — sound

Replaces six stale await_next literals in a single test file with the current await_event tool name so the scripted driver can drain workers again and the metering tests pass.

• What it does: In tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts it changes every occurrence of the obsolete coordination tool name await_next to await_event in the scripted meteredChat turns and in the observability assertion (6 replacements total).
• Goals it achieves: Restores the two failing winner-expecting tests by making the scripted driver call a tool that actually exists, so the worker settlement is drained and the tests return winner instead of no-winner; also brings the test file into line with the post-#318 coordination toolbox vocabulary.
• Assessment: Good. The change is minimal, surgical, and exactly matches the codebase's current grain: await_event is the single canonical wait verb defined in src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 and used throughout tests, docs, and skills. The PR author also swept the repo and confirmed no stale await_next remains.
• Better / existing approach: none — this is the right approach. Adding a backwards-compatibility alias for await_next would fight the codebase's one-verb design and create unnecessary maintenance surface.
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":1,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

🎯 Usefulness — sound

Restores a stale test script to the live coordination-verb surface; no new API, no dead code, no competing pattern.

• Integration: The change replaces stale await_next literals with await_event in tests/loops/driver-inference-metering.test.ts so the scripted driver-LLM calls a tool that actually exists. The real tool is registered at src/mcp/tools/coordination.ts:402 as name: 'await_event'. A repo-wide grep for await_next returned no matches, so no stale references remain. await_event is already reachable across
• Fit with existing patterns: It fits the established pattern exactly. The coordination driver exposes the verbs spawn_worker, await_event, observe_worker, steer_worker, stop over a live scope, and the production prompt in src/runtime/supervise/authoring.ts:56 already instructs the driver to use await_event (kinds:['settled']). The test was just out of sync after the rename in #318; the fix brings it back into th
• Real-world viability: The runtime behavior is unchanged; the driver already handles unknown tools correctly by folding {error: 'unknown tool: ...'} back to the LLM (src/runtime/supervise/coordination-driver.ts:200-203), which a real LLM would recover from. The fixed test now correctly drains spawned workers via the valid tool and asserts on the real metering, nested re-homing, crash recovery, budget bounds, and obs
• Model: kimi-code/kimi-for-coding
• Bridge attempts: 3
• Bridge warning: opencode/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reason":"queue_timeout","admission":{"active":24,"queued":2,"maxActive":24,"maxQueue":32}}}; opencode/zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1: Bridge returned 503: {"error":{"message":"cli-bridge admission timed out after 30000ms","type":"admission_rejected","reas

No concerns — sound change, no better or existing approach found. ✅

---

What this audit checks

It judges the change on its merits — not whether it was tasked out in an issue. Unticketed, fast-moving work is fine; the question is whether the change is good and whether a better or existing approach should be used instead.

Pass	What it asks
Heuristic	Vague title? Whitespace-only or cruft-bearing diff? (content signals only)
Duplication	Do added function/class names already exist elsewhere in the repo?
Value Audit	What does it do? What goal does it achieve? Is it good? Better architecture or already-exists?
Usefulness Audit	Does it integrate and fit? Will it hold up in real use and actually get used?

Findings are concerns, not blocks — the human reviewer decides what to do with them.

_{value-audit · 20260617T103131Z}

[tangletools]

✅ No Blockers — 933d5f39

Readiness 95/100 · Confidence 65/100 · 0 findings (none)

	deepseek	glm	aggregate
Readiness	95	95	95
Confidence	65	65	65
Correctness	95	95	95
Security	95	95	95
Testing	95	95	95
Architecture	95	95	95

Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision. | Full multi-shot audit completed 1/1 planned shots over 1 changed files. Global verifier still owns final merge decision.

No findings.

---

_{tangletools · 2026-06-17T10:33:00Z · trace}