Give a nested run-profile child a deterministic agent route #641

Description

@taras

Problem

A nested <Execution host="run"> child resolves none of the agent words, so a Markdown test suite cannot drive an agent-using document deterministically. Verified on main (7a4d27ea).

Smallest reproducer, via xmd test:

<Testname="a run child resolves Session">
<Execution host="run" source={'<Sessionname="s">hi</Session>\n'} as="child">
<AssertEqualsactual={child.result.ok}expected={false} />
<AssertStringIncludesactual={child.result.error.message}expected="MARKER" />
</Execution>
</Test>
Failed to import component Session: Cannot resolve component: Session (searched: components, .)
Failed to import component Prompt: Cannot resolve component: Prompt (searched: components, .)

Scope

The gap is in the shared child assembly, not in xmd test itself. runProfileChild (packages/cli/src/testing-host.ts) calls installDocumentComponents({ testing: false }, false) — which installs the agent stack only for mode.testing or mode.agent — and passes executeInstalled(..., []) with no agentIdentityComponents(). The same assembly serves every host of the run profile; in practice it is reached from test documents, because <Execution> is valid only inside a canonical <Test> and <Test> bodies run only under an active testing session. Root documents are unaffected: xmd run has the full live stack, and an xmd test root has the agent words plus <TestAgent>.

Wiring alone is not a fix (measured)

Patching the child to add installAgentComponents() and [{ components: agentIdentityComponents() }] moves the failure exactly one step:

Agent.session() has no provider — install one with installAgentComponents({ rootProvider: { factory, options } })

and every channel a child document could use to supply a provider is runtime-proven dead:

  • <AgentProvider name="acpx">Unknown agent provider "acpx" — the registry is scope-local and the child's fresh scope holds no registrations.
  • <TestAgent> → unresolved (registered only under mode.testing), and it refuses outside an active testing session anyway.
  • Providers installed by the enclosing test never reach the child: it runs in a fresh scope (createScope(), packages/testing/src/execution-harness.ts:673), isolation the module header states as design.
  • Repository components shadowing Session/Prompt would resolve through the search path, but substituting the trusted orchestration's words is exactly what the Add xmd prompt: turn a request into an approved executable Plan #260 handoff forbids.

What a fix is

A first-class channel that carries scripted agent behavior (and an elicitation provider) across the execution boundary into the child — an architecture feature with a security surface (what may a test hand a child?), not a wiring change. Until then, the deterministic route for agent-using roots is a TypeScript launcher: executeInstalled on the document as root, with agentIdentityComponents() and scripted Agent/Elicitation providers installed around the call.

Why now

The issue #260xmd prompt prototype's frozen evidence prefers a Markdown suite under packages/cli/tests/document-suites/prompt/; this gap is why that suite cannot exist yet. Full evidence: issue-260-markdown-prototype-implementor-feedback.md (repo root, untracked). Companion contract issue: #640.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      Give a nested run-profile child a deterministic agent route #641

      Description

      @taras

      Problem

      A nested <Execution host="run"> child resolves none of the agent words, so a Markdown test suite cannot drive an agent-using document deterministically. Verified on main (7a4d27ea).

      Smallest reproducer, via xmd test:

      <Testname="a run child resolves Session">
      <Execution host="run" source={'<Sessionname="s">hi</Session>\n'} as="child">
      <AssertEqualsactual={child.result.ok}expected={false} />
      <AssertStringIncludesactual={child.result.error.message}expected="MARKER" />
      </Execution>
      </Test>
      Failed to import component Session: Cannot resolve component: Session (searched: components, .)
      Failed to import component Prompt: Cannot resolve component: Prompt (searched: components, .)
      

      Scope

      The gap is in the shared child assembly, not in xmd test itself. runProfileChild (packages/cli/src/testing-host.ts) calls installDocumentComponents({ testing: false }, false) — which installs the agent stack only for mode.testing or mode.agent — and passes executeInstalled(..., []) with no agentIdentityComponents(). The same assembly serves every host of the run profile; in practice it is reached from test documents, because <Execution> is valid only inside a canonical <Test> and <Test> bodies run only under an active testing session. Root documents are unaffected: xmd run has the full live stack, and an xmd test root has the agent words plus <TestAgent>.

      Wiring alone is not a fix (measured)

      Patching the child to add installAgentComponents() and [{ components: agentIdentityComponents() }] moves the failure exactly one step:

      Agent.session() has no provider — install one with installAgentComponents({ rootProvider: { factory, options } })
      

      and every channel a child document could use to supply a provider is runtime-proven dead:

      • <AgentProvider name="acpx">Unknown agent provider "acpx" — the registry is scope-local and the child's fresh scope holds no registrations.
      • <TestAgent> → unresolved (registered only under mode.testing), and it refuses outside an active testing session anyway.
      • Providers installed by the enclosing test never reach the child: it runs in a fresh scope (createScope(), packages/testing/src/execution-harness.ts:673), isolation the module header states as design.
      • Repository components shadowing Session/Prompt would resolve through the search path, but substituting the trusted orchestration's words is exactly what the Add xmd prompt: turn a request into an approved executable Plan #260 handoff forbids.

      What a fix is

      A first-class channel that carries scripted agent behavior (and an elicitation provider) across the execution boundary into the child — an architecture feature with a security surface (what may a test hand a child?), not a wiring change. Until then, the deterministic route for agent-using roots is a TypeScript launcher: executeInstalled on the document as root, with agentIdentityComponents() and scripted Agent/Elicitation providers installed around the call.

      Why now

      The issue #260xmd prompt prototype's frozen evidence prefers a Markdown suite under packages/cli/tests/document-suites/prompt/; this gap is why that suite cannot exist yet. Full evidence: issue-260-markdown-prototype-implementor-feedback.md (repo root, untracked). Companion contract issue: #640.

      Activity

      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          Give a nested run-profile child a deterministic agent route #641

          Description

          @taras

          Problem

          A nested <Execution host="run"> child resolves none of the agent words, so a Markdown test suite cannot drive an agent-using document deterministically. Verified on main (7a4d27ea).

          Smallest reproducer, via xmd test:

          <Testname="a run child resolves Session">
          <Execution host="run" source={'<Sessionname="s">hi</Session>\n'} as="child">
          <AssertEqualsactual={child.result.ok}expected={false} />
          <AssertStringIncludesactual={child.result.error.message}expected="MARKER" />
          </Execution>
          </Test>
          Failed to import component Session: Cannot resolve component: Session (searched: components, .)
          Failed to import component Prompt: Cannot resolve component: Prompt (searched: components, .)
          

          Scope

          The gap is in the shared child assembly, not in xmd test itself. runProfileChild (packages/cli/src/testing-host.ts) calls installDocumentComponents({ testing: false }, false) — which installs the agent stack only for mode.testing or mode.agent — and passes executeInstalled(..., []) with no agentIdentityComponents(). The same assembly serves every host of the run profile; in practice it is reached from test documents, because <Execution> is valid only inside a canonical <Test> and <Test> bodies run only under an active testing session. Root documents are unaffected: xmd run has the full live stack, and an xmd test root has the agent words plus <TestAgent>.

          Wiring alone is not a fix (measured)

          Patching the child to add installAgentComponents() and [{ components: agentIdentityComponents() }] moves the failure exactly one step:

          Agent.session() has no provider — install one with installAgentComponents({ rootProvider: { factory, options } })
          

          and every channel a child document could use to supply a provider is runtime-proven dead:

          • <AgentProvider name="acpx">Unknown agent provider "acpx" — the registry is scope-local and the child's fresh scope holds no registrations.
          • <TestAgent> → unresolved (registered only under mode.testing), and it refuses outside an active testing session anyway.
          • Providers installed by the enclosing test never reach the child: it runs in a fresh scope (createScope(), packages/testing/src/execution-harness.ts:673), isolation the module header states as design.
          • Repository components shadowing Session/Prompt would resolve through the search path, but substituting the trusted orchestration's words is exactly what the Add xmd prompt: turn a request into an approved executable Plan #260 handoff forbids.

          What a fix is

          A first-class channel that carries scripted agent behavior (and an elicitation provider) across the execution boundary into the child — an architecture feature with a security surface (what may a test hand a child?), not a wiring change. Until then, the deterministic route for agent-using roots is a TypeScript launcher: executeInstalled on the document as root, with agentIdentityComponents() and scripted Agent/Elicitation providers installed around the call.

          Why now

          The issue #260xmd prompt prototype's frozen evidence prefers a Markdown suite under packages/cli/tests/document-suites/prompt/; this gap is why that suite cannot exist yet. Full evidence: issue-260-markdown-prototype-implementor-feedback.md (repo root, untracked). Companion contract issue: #640.

          Activity

          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Give a nested run-profile child a deterministic agent route #641

              Description

              @taras

              Problem

              A nested <Execution host="run"> child resolves none of the agent words, so a Markdown test suite cannot drive an agent-using document deterministically. Verified on main (7a4d27ea).

              Smallest reproducer, via xmd test:

              <Testname="a run child resolves Session">
              <Execution host="run" source={'<Sessionname="s">hi</Session>\n'} as="child">
              <AssertEqualsactual={child.result.ok}expected={false} />
              <AssertStringIncludesactual={child.result.error.message}expected="MARKER" />
              </Execution>
              </Test>
              Failed to import component Session: Cannot resolve component: Session (searched: components, .)
              Failed to import component Prompt: Cannot resolve component: Prompt (searched: components, .)
              

              Scope

              The gap is in the shared child assembly, not in xmd test itself. runProfileChild (packages/cli/src/testing-host.ts) calls installDocumentComponents({ testing: false }, false) — which installs the agent stack only for mode.testing or mode.agent — and passes executeInstalled(..., []) with no agentIdentityComponents(). The same assembly serves every host of the run profile; in practice it is reached from test documents, because <Execution> is valid only inside a canonical <Test> and <Test> bodies run only under an active testing session. Root documents are unaffected: xmd run has the full live stack, and an xmd test root has the agent words plus <TestAgent>.

              Wiring alone is not a fix (measured)

              Patching the child to add installAgentComponents() and [{ components: agentIdentityComponents() }] moves the failure exactly one step:

              Agent.session() has no provider — install one with installAgentComponents({ rootProvider: { factory, options } })
              

              and every channel a child document could use to supply a provider is runtime-proven dead:

              • <AgentProvider name="acpx">Unknown agent provider "acpx" — the registry is scope-local and the child's fresh scope holds no registrations.
              • <TestAgent> → unresolved (registered only under mode.testing), and it refuses outside an active testing session anyway.
              • Providers installed by the enclosing test never reach the child: it runs in a fresh scope (createScope(), packages/testing/src/execution-harness.ts:673), isolation the module header states as design.
              • Repository components shadowing Session/Prompt would resolve through the search path, but substituting the trusted orchestration's words is exactly what the Add xmd prompt: turn a request into an approved executable Plan #260 handoff forbids.

              What a fix is

              A first-class channel that carries scripted agent behavior (and an elicitation provider) across the execution boundary into the child — an architecture feature with a security surface (what may a test hand a child?), not a wiring change. Until then, the deterministic route for agent-using roots is a TypeScript launcher: executeInstalled on the document as root, with agentIdentityComponents() and scripted Agent/Elicitation providers installed around the call.

              Why now

              The issue #260xmd prompt prototype's frozen evidence prefers a Markdown suite under packages/cli/tests/document-suites/prompt/; this gap is why that suite cannot exist yet. Full evidence: issue-260-markdown-prototype-implementor-feedback.md (repo root, untracked). Companion contract issue: #640.

              Activity

              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  Give a nested run-profile child a deterministic agent route #641

                  Description

                  @taras

                  Problem

                  A nested <Execution host="run"> child resolves none of the agent words, so a Markdown test suite cannot drive an agent-using document deterministically. Verified on main (7a4d27ea).

                  Smallest reproducer, via xmd test:

                  <Testname="a run child resolves Session">
                  <Execution host="run" source={'<Sessionname="s">hi</Session>\n'} as="child">
                  <AssertEqualsactual={child.result.ok}expected={false} />
                  <AssertStringIncludesactual={child.result.error.message}expected="MARKER" />
                  </Execution>
                  </Test>
                  Failed to import component Session: Cannot resolve component: Session (searched: components, .)
                  Failed to import component Prompt: Cannot resolve component: Prompt (searched: components, .)
                  

                  Scope

                  The gap is in the shared child assembly, not in xmd test itself. runProfileChild (packages/cli/src/testing-host.ts) calls installDocumentComponents({ testing: false }, false) — which installs the agent stack only for mode.testing or mode.agent — and passes executeInstalled(..., []) with no agentIdentityComponents(). The same assembly serves every host of the run profile; in practice it is reached from test documents, because <Execution> is valid only inside a canonical <Test> and <Test> bodies run only under an active testing session. Root documents are unaffected: xmd run has the full live stack, and an xmd test root has the agent words plus <TestAgent>.

                  Wiring alone is not a fix (measured)

                  Patching the child to add installAgentComponents() and [{ components: agentIdentityComponents() }] moves the failure exactly one step:

                  Agent.session() has no provider — install one with installAgentComponents({ rootProvider: { factory, options } })
                  

                  and every channel a child document could use to supply a provider is runtime-proven dead:

                  • <AgentProvider name="acpx">Unknown agent provider "acpx" — the registry is scope-local and the child's fresh scope holds no registrations.
                  • <TestAgent> → unresolved (registered only under mode.testing), and it refuses outside an active testing session anyway.
                  • Providers installed by the enclosing test never reach the child: it runs in a fresh scope (createScope(), packages/testing/src/execution-harness.ts:673), isolation the module header states as design.
                  • Repository components shadowing Session/Prompt would resolve through the search path, but substituting the trusted orchestration's words is exactly what the Add xmd prompt: turn a request into an approved executable Plan #260 handoff forbids.

                  What a fix is

                  A first-class channel that carries scripted agent behavior (and an elicitation provider) across the execution boundary into the child — an architecture feature with a security surface (what may a test hand a child?), not a wiring change. Until then, the deterministic route for agent-using roots is a TypeScript launcher: executeInstalled on the document as root, with agentIdentityComponents() and scripted Agent/Elicitation providers installed around the call.

                  Why now

                  The issue #260xmd prompt prototype's frozen evidence prefers a Markdown suite under packages/cli/tests/document-suites/prompt/; this gap is why that suite cannot exist yet. Full evidence: issue-260-markdown-prototype-implementor-feedback.md (repo root, untracked). Companion contract issue: #640.

                  Activity

                  Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    No labels
                    No labels

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      Give a nested run-profile child a deterministic agent route #641

                      Description

                      @taras

                      Problem

                      A nested <Execution host="run"> child resolves none of the agent words, so a Markdown test suite cannot drive an agent-using document deterministically. Verified on main (7a4d27ea).

                      Smallest reproducer, via xmd test:

                      <Testname="a run child resolves Session">
                      <Execution host="run" source={'<Sessionname="s">hi</Session>\n'} as="child">
                      <AssertEqualsactual={child.result.ok}expected={false} />
                      <AssertStringIncludesactual={child.result.error.message}expected="MARKER" />
                      </Execution>
                      </Test>
                      Failed to import component Session: Cannot resolve component: Session (searched: components, .)
                      Failed to import component Prompt: Cannot resolve component: Prompt (searched: components, .)
                      

                      Scope

                      The gap is in the shared child assembly, not in xmd test itself. runProfileChild (packages/cli/src/testing-host.ts) calls installDocumentComponents({ testing: false }, false) — which installs the agent stack only for mode.testing or mode.agent — and passes executeInstalled(..., []) with no agentIdentityComponents(). The same assembly serves every host of the run profile; in practice it is reached from test documents, because <Execution> is valid only inside a canonical <Test> and <Test> bodies run only under an active testing session. Root documents are unaffected: xmd run has the full live stack, and an xmd test root has the agent words plus <TestAgent>.

                      Wiring alone is not a fix (measured)

                      Patching the child to add installAgentComponents() and [{ components: agentIdentityComponents() }] moves the failure exactly one step:

                      Agent.session() has no provider — install one with installAgentComponents({ rootProvider: { factory, options } })
                      

                      and every channel a child document could use to supply a provider is runtime-proven dead:

                      • <AgentProvider name="acpx">Unknown agent provider "acpx" — the registry is scope-local and the child's fresh scope holds no registrations.
                      • <TestAgent> → unresolved (registered only under mode.testing), and it refuses outside an active testing session anyway.
                      • Providers installed by the enclosing test never reach the child: it runs in a fresh scope (createScope(), packages/testing/src/execution-harness.ts:673), isolation the module header states as design.
                      • Repository components shadowing Session/Prompt would resolve through the search path, but substituting the trusted orchestration's words is exactly what the Add xmd prompt: turn a request into an approved executable Plan #260 handoff forbids.

                      What a fix is

                      A first-class channel that carries scripted agent behavior (and an elicitation provider) across the execution boundary into the child — an architecture feature with a security surface (what may a test hand a child?), not a wiring change. Until then, the deterministic route for agent-using roots is a TypeScript launcher: executeInstalled on the document as root, with agentIdentityComponents() and scripted Agent/Elicitation providers installed around the call.

                      Why now

                      The issue #260xmd prompt prototype's frozen evidence prefers a Markdown suite under packages/cli/tests/document-suites/prompt/; this gap is why that suite cannot exist yet. Full evidence: issue-260-markdown-prototype-implementor-feedback.md (repo root, untracked). Companion contract issue: #640.

                      Activity

                      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        No labels
                        No labels

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          Give a nested run-profile child a deterministic agent route #641

                          Description

                          @taras

                          Problem

                          A nested <Execution host="run"> child resolves none of the agent words, so a Markdown test suite cannot drive an agent-using document deterministically. Verified on main (7a4d27ea).

                          Smallest reproducer, via xmd test:

                          <Testname="a run child resolves Session">
                          <Execution host="run" source={'<Sessionname="s">hi</Session>\n'} as="child">
                          <AssertEqualsactual={child.result.ok}expected={false} />
                          <AssertStringIncludesactual={child.result.error.message}expected="MARKER" />
                          </Execution>
                          </Test>
                          Failed to import component Session: Cannot resolve component: Session (searched: components, .)
                          Failed to import component Prompt: Cannot resolve component: Prompt (searched: components, .)
                          

                          Scope

                          The gap is in the shared child assembly, not in xmd test itself. runProfileChild (packages/cli/src/testing-host.ts) calls installDocumentComponents({ testing: false }, false) — which installs the agent stack only for mode.testing or mode.agent — and passes executeInstalled(..., []) with no agentIdentityComponents(). The same assembly serves every host of the run profile; in practice it is reached from test documents, because <Execution> is valid only inside a canonical <Test> and <Test> bodies run only under an active testing session. Root documents are unaffected: xmd run has the full live stack, and an xmd test root has the agent words plus <TestAgent>.

                          Wiring alone is not a fix (measured)

                          Patching the child to add installAgentComponents() and [{ components: agentIdentityComponents() }] moves the failure exactly one step:

                          Agent.session() has no provider — install one with installAgentComponents({ rootProvider: { factory, options } })
                          

                          and every channel a child document could use to supply a provider is runtime-proven dead:

                          • <AgentProvider name="acpx">Unknown agent provider "acpx" — the registry is scope-local and the child's fresh scope holds no registrations.
                          • <TestAgent> → unresolved (registered only under mode.testing), and it refuses outside an active testing session anyway.
                          • Providers installed by the enclosing test never reach the child: it runs in a fresh scope (createScope(), packages/testing/src/execution-harness.ts:673), isolation the module header states as design.
                          • Repository components shadowing Session/Prompt would resolve through the search path, but substituting the trusted orchestration's words is exactly what the Add xmd prompt: turn a request into an approved executable Plan #260 handoff forbids.

                          What a fix is

                          A first-class channel that carries scripted agent behavior (and an elicitation provider) across the execution boundary into the child — an architecture feature with a security surface (what may a test hand a child?), not a wiring change. Until then, the deterministic route for agent-using roots is a TypeScript launcher: executeInstalled on the document as root, with agentIdentityComponents() and scripted Agent/Elicitation providers installed around the call.

                          Why now

                          The issue #260xmd prompt prototype's frozen evidence prefers a Markdown suite under packages/cli/tests/document-suites/prompt/; this gap is why that suite cannot exist yet. Full evidence: issue-260-markdown-prototype-implementor-feedback.md (repo root, untracked). Companion contract issue: #640.

                          Activity

                          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            No labels
                            No labels

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              Give a nested run-profile child a deterministic agent route #641

                              Description

                              @taras

                              Problem

                              A nested <Execution host="run"> child resolves none of the agent words, so a Markdown test suite cannot drive an agent-using document deterministically. Verified on main (7a4d27ea).

                              Smallest reproducer, via xmd test:

                              <Testname="a run child resolves Session">
                              <Execution host="run" source={'<Sessionname="s">hi</Session>\n'} as="child">
                              <AssertEqualsactual={child.result.ok}expected={false} />
                              <AssertStringIncludesactual={child.result.error.message}expected="MARKER" />
                              </Execution>
                              </Test>
                              Failed to import component Session: Cannot resolve component: Session (searched: components, .)
                              Failed to import component Prompt: Cannot resolve component: Prompt (searched: components, .)
                              

                              Scope

                              The gap is in the shared child assembly, not in xmd test itself. runProfileChild (packages/cli/src/testing-host.ts) calls installDocumentComponents({ testing: false }, false) — which installs the agent stack only for mode.testing or mode.agent — and passes executeInstalled(..., []) with no agentIdentityComponents(). The same assembly serves every host of the run profile; in practice it is reached from test documents, because <Execution> is valid only inside a canonical <Test> and <Test> bodies run only under an active testing session. Root documents are unaffected: xmd run has the full live stack, and an xmd test root has the agent words plus <TestAgent>.

                              Wiring alone is not a fix (measured)

                              Patching the child to add installAgentComponents() and [{ components: agentIdentityComponents() }] moves the failure exactly one step:

                              Agent.session() has no provider — install one with installAgentComponents({ rootProvider: { factory, options } })
                              

                              and every channel a child document could use to supply a provider is runtime-proven dead:

                              • <AgentProvider name="acpx">Unknown agent provider "acpx" — the registry is scope-local and the child's fresh scope holds no registrations.
                              • <TestAgent> → unresolved (registered only under mode.testing), and it refuses outside an active testing session anyway.
                              • Providers installed by the enclosing test never reach the child: it runs in a fresh scope (createScope(), packages/testing/src/execution-harness.ts:673), isolation the module header states as design.
                              • Repository components shadowing Session/Prompt would resolve through the search path, but substituting the trusted orchestration's words is exactly what the Add xmd prompt: turn a request into an approved executable Plan #260 handoff forbids.

                              What a fix is

                              A first-class channel that carries scripted agent behavior (and an elicitation provider) across the execution boundary into the child — an architecture feature with a security surface (what may a test hand a child?), not a wiring change. Until then, the deterministic route for agent-using roots is a TypeScript launcher: executeInstalled on the document as root, with agentIdentityComponents() and scripted Agent/Elicitation providers installed around the call.

                              Why now

                              The issue #260xmd prompt prototype's frozen evidence prefers a Markdown suite under packages/cli/tests/document-suites/prompt/; this gap is why that suite cannot exist yet. Full evidence: issue-260-markdown-prototype-implementor-feedback.md (repo root, untracked). Companion contract issue: #640.

                              Activity

                              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                No labels
                                No labels

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions