Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Move ndarray library to its own repository - #301
Conversation
karllessard
commented
Apr 27, 2021
CC\ @saudet |
saudet
commented
Apr 28, 2021
Sounds alright and looks fine, but did you want me to look at something in particular? Just one thing, we probably want to set the version to 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 0.3.1. |
karllessard
commented
Apr 28, 2021
Nothing in particular, was just seeking for a general feedback like this one, thanks. The version is 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT btw, it’s just the example in the README that shows the usage of the last released version. |
saudet
commented
Apr 28, 2021
Since we're probably going to end up with more modules, maybe we could rename the "ndarray" one to "ndarray-core" or something? |
karllessard
commented
Apr 28, 2021
I think I still prefer the simplicity of Ideally we would have done the same with tensorflow but |
karllessard
commented
May 1, 2021
Ok I’ll take this as a go, thanks! |
The Java NdArray library now have its own repository, to emphasis its independence from TensorFlow itself and allow it to have its own development/release cycle.
As part of the review of this PR, please take also a look at the new repository : https://github.com/tensorflow/java-ndarray and let me know if you see anything that should be changed there as well.
A note on this, I've moved the library as a sub-module since we might end up having other modules there as well, e.g.
ndarray-kotlin. Also, I've pickedtensorflow-java-ndarrayas the name of the parent module so it matches the name of the repo (liketensorflow-javamatches this one) but I guess this is also debatable.