Skip to content

fix: Ex. 1.2.18/1.2.24 duplicate doc labels - #574

Merged
teorth merged 1 commit into
teorth:mainfrom
Chessing234:fix/measure-1-2-18-24-exercise-labels
Aug 2, 2026
Merged

fix: Ex. 1.2.18/1.2.24 duplicate doc labels#574
teorth merged 1 commit into
teorth:mainfrom
Chessing234:fix/measure-1-2-18-24-exercise-labels

Conversation

@Chessing234

@Chessing234Chessing234 commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Renumber second Exercise 1.2.18(ii) (inner_measure.eq_iff) to (iii).
  • Drop duplicate (ii) labels on Ex. 1.2.24 metric/complete instances.
  • Split duplicate Exercise 1.2.12 (i/ii) and 1.2.22 (i–iii) labels.

Test plan

  • lake build Analysis.MeasureTheory.Section_1_2_2

Rebased onto upstream/main; disambiguate repeated exercise labels.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@Chessing234
Chessing234force-pushed the fix/measure-1-2-18-24-exercise-labels branch from 989399d to 59f8d28CompareJuly 29, 2026 15:43
@Chessing234

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@teorth gentle bump — this is a small Verso/docstring hygiene fix with green CI. Happy to rebase or adjust if anything looks off; otherwise ready whenever you have a moment.

@teorth
teorth merged commit 8d0706c into teorth:mainAug 2, 2026
2 checks passed
Chessing234 pushed a commit to Chessing234/analysis that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2026
… three
Both exercises are split across three Lean declarations, and teorth#574 labelled
the third of each as part (iii). But in the text each exercise has only
two parts, and it is part (ii) that carries two conclusions:
Exercise 1.2.18(ii): "Show that m_*(E) <= m^*(E), and that equality
holds if and only if E is Lebesgue measurable."
Exercise 1.2.22(ii): "Show that E x F is Lebesgue measurable, with
m(E x F) = m(E) m(F)."
So inner_measure.eq_iff and Lebesgue_measure.prod are the second halves
of part (ii), not parts of their own. Relabel them (ii'), following the
convention already used for Exercise 1.3.8(vi')/(vi'') in 7a9e513.
Exercise 1.2.24 does have four parts in the text, so its (i)-(iv)
labels are correct and are left alone.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Chessing234@teorth