Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we need to leave this configurable because otherwise people want to monkeypatch our modules
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't they just use the environment variable to configure it if someone ever needs it? A quick search on GitHub shows no-one is actually calling
TestcontainersConfigurationwith custom paramsOtherwise we can keep
c.ryuk_docker_socketas a direct property for people to configureAnd rename the new computed property to something else, e.g.
c.docker_socketorc.get_docker_socket()(and use this computed property when needing to provide the docker socket)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see #531
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't really see where is the problem, it is possible to monkeypatch a computed property:
Otherwise I proposed another solution with a static property + a computed one, would this fit?